Penelope
Diamond Member
- Jul 15, 2014
- 60,265
- 15,805
- 2,210
The evidence for this is often patchy, with Republicans — generally the people articulating this line of argument — often pointing to things like drug seizures as evidence. That those are seizures, drugs generally stopped at the border, doesn’t seem to derail the argument. After all, the same rhetorical trick is applied to immigrants themselves; that most of those stopped at the U.S.-Mexico border were prevented from entering doesn’t exclude them from being added to what’s meant to be a scary-sounding total number of people seeking to come to the United States.they cant talk about the economy , inflation , crime , record fentanyl overdoses , border security , and just about every other thing that effects Americans safety and standard of living ... they have no choice but to make it about a man that has been out of office for 2 yrs .
But there’s another point that’s worth drawing out here. Seizures are a dubious metric not only because those drugs will not be sold in the United States but also because of where and how those seizures occur: usually at border checkpoints and often in the possession of U.S. citizens.
If only people would stop taking street drugs. We have a drug problem, it got worst during the tramp admin.
I think history repeats, if the republicans don't win , they are going to start a civil war.
Last edited: