- Thread starter
- #141
Yeah I know where I am posting. And?
and it's nice to have verification once in a while.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah I know where I am posting. And?
☭proletarian☭;2062558 said:Agreed.
Like the entire works of Ludwig von Mises
Ludwig von Mises would oppose a minimum wage.
you two need an agent.
Ludwig von Mises would oppose a minimum wage.
you two need an agent.
I'm just curious as to the nonsensical notion of praising Ludwig von Mises and a minimum wage in the same thread. It's contradictory.
you two need an agent.
I'm just curious as to the nonsensical notion of praising Ludwig von Mises and a minimum wage in the same thread. It's contradictory.
and here I thought you had a sense of humor.
Agent?☭proletarian☭;2062558 said:Agreed.
Like the entire works of Ludwig von Mises
Ludwig von Mises would oppose a minimum wage.
you two need an agent.
Was he a God? No, he was but a wise man. He was not perfect, and, like Marx he made many sound point without being correct on all matters.Ludwig von Mises would oppose a minimum wage.
you two need an agent.
I'm just curious as to the nonsensical notion of praising Ludwig von Mises and a minimum wage in the same thread. It's contradictory.
☭proletarian☭;2065052 said:Was he a God? No, he was but a wise man. He was not perfect, and, like Marx he made many sound point without being correct on all matters.you two need an agent.
I'm just curious as to the nonsensical notion of praising Ludwig von Mises and a minimum wage in the same thread. It's contradictory.
Unlike you, I am wise and honest enough to embrace wisdom from all people who possess it while rejecting that which does not work. I worship no men and no men are above review or criticism.
☭proletarian☭;2065058 said:I do support the free market. I'm just smart enough to realize that a free market can only exist with proper regulation in place. History has shown us that without proper regulation, the Bourgeois quickly secure their power, there is no competition, and the masses suffer.
Weve come through the second-worst financial crisis in the history of the world bruised and shocked, but on the road to recovery. Agree?
Who gets the credit for averting complete disaster, the invisible hand or Obama? If not Obama, who?
Unemployment is high, there is a sense of bewilderment clouding the minds of the public, but all signs say we are out of the wood and on the road to recovery. Are you better off now than where only a year ago, you thought you'd be?
Credit has to go to somebody. Why haven't Obama and the Democrats formulated a message around this?
☭proletarian☭;2066118 said:Which means I support a free market.
You do not support a free market. You'd rather allow the richest few control the market and stifle all competition, everyone else be damned.
You support economic oligarchy.
You support child sweatshops, colonialism, and slave labour.
I support human rights and the true free market.
The rights of people come before the profits of the corporation.
☭proletarian☭;2066118 said:Which means I support a free market.
You do not support a free market. You'd rather allow the richest few control the market and stifle all competition, everyone else be damned.
You support economic oligarchy.
You support child sweatshops, colonialism, and slave labour.
I support human rights and the true free market.
The rights of people come before the profits of the corporation.
No what you support is economic interventionism, which is, of course, not a free market no matter how you try to spin it as such.
☭proletarian☭;2066230 said:Fail.
I support regulation, not intervention.
I've explained this to you in the past. Why do you insist on being so dishonest?
☭proletarian☭;2066118 said:Which means I support a free market.
You do not support a free market. You'd rather allow the richest few control the market and stifle all competition, everyone else be damned.
You support economic oligarchy.
You support child sweatshops, colonialism, and slave labour.
I support human rights and the true free market.
The rights of people come before the profits of the corporation.
No what you support is economic interventionism, which is, of course, not a free market no matter how you try to spin it as such.
We don't have a free market now, we have fascism....all the money going to the uber wealthy and the heck with the middle-class and working class.
If we had a free market we wouldn't have bailed out the banks. Our government wouldn't have stepped in when the teamsters were striking, etc.
So in a free market the govt should provide no support to business right?
Like protecting foreign interests in corporations?
Like the FDA providing security for depositors so they will deposit?
Or like FHA, the patent office, etc?
Or providine specific incentives for a business to locate somewhere?
☭proletarian☭;2066230 said:Fail.
I support regulation, not intervention.
I've explained this to you in the past. Why do you insist on being so dishonest?
Government regulation is economic intervention.
I'm not half so dishonest as someone like you claiming to be an adherent of the Austrian school of economics.