28 Republicans who think gay people are “groomers” just voted against a bill that would do more to help protect children against sexual abuse

[Billy000]

“It’s full of pork!” those officials are likely saying.

Did you read it? No you didn’t. That’s just your knee jerk reaction to anything the GOP votes against.

Surprised? No. None of us should be.

28 Republicans Who Call Gay People 'Groomers' Just Voted Against a Bill Addressing Child Sex Abuse

For the past year, we’ve been subjected to an endless, escalating right-wing fearmongering campaign presenting LGBTQ adults as innate child sexual predators, or “groomers,” and any children in their vicinity as victims. People are literally throwing molotov cocktails into establishments that...

www.yahoo.com

 

[Darkwind]

“It’s full of pork!” those officials are likely saying.

Did you read it? No you didn’t. That’s just your knee jerk reaction to anything the GOP votes against.

Surprised? No. None of us should be.

28 Republicans Who Call Gay People 'Groomers' Just Voted Against a Bill Addressing Child Sex Abuse

For the past year, we’ve been subjected to an endless, escalating right-wing fearmongering campaign presenting LGBTQ adults as innate child sexual predators, or “groomers,” and any children in their vicinity as victims. People are literally throwing molotov cocktails into establishments that...

www.yahoo.com

Post the bill. Not a summary, not someone's opinion, but post the actual bill.

Because no one here gives a fuck what you think.

 

[Auld Phart]

“It’s full of pork!” those officials are likely saying.

Did you read it? No you didn’t. That’s just your knee jerk reaction to anything the GOP votes against.

Surprised? No. None of us should be.

28 Republicans Who Call Gay People 'Groomers' Just Voted Against a Bill Addressing Child Sex Abuse

For the past year, we’ve been subjected to an endless, escalating right-wing fearmongering campaign presenting LGBTQ adults as innate child sexual predators, or “groomers,” and any children in their vicinity as victims. People are literally throwing molotov cocktails into establishments that...

www.yahoo.com

That’s just your knee jerk reaction to anything the GOP votes against.

how do you know there isn't pork in it?

 

[Billy000]

Post the bill. Not a summary, not someone's opinion, but post that actual bill.

Because no one here gives a fuck what you think.

Apparently you don’t give a shit about kids either. Yikes!

 

[Billy000]

how do you know there isn't pork in it?

I don’t but because that is the knee jerk reaction that Republicans have to voting against common sense, it’s worth mentioning. In other words, they are going to say that regardless of whether or not pork is actually in it. Of course, Boebert hasn’t offered an explanation for her vote. Probably because she wants to help people forget her husband exposed his penis in a bowling alley. Republicans are so classy!

 

[Auld Phart]

I don’t but because that is the knee jerk reaction that Republicans have to voting against common sense, it’s worth mentioning. In other words, they are going to say that regardless of whether or not pork is actually in it. Of course, Boebert hasn’t offered an explanation for her vote. Probably because she wants to help people forget her husband exposed his penis in a bowling alley. Republicans are so classy!

I don’t

OK

here's an idea.

Read the bill, and see if there is any pork in it.

Then start running your mouth.

 

[Ralph Norton]

“It’s full of pork!” those officials are likely saying.

Did you read it? No you didn’t. That’s just your knee jerk reaction to anything the GOP votes against.

Surprised? No. None of us should be.

28 Republicans Who Call Gay People 'Groomers' Just Voted Against a Bill Addressing Child Sex Abuse

For the past year, we’ve been subjected to an endless, escalating right-wing fearmongering campaign presenting LGBTQ adults as innate child sexual predators, or “groomers,” and any children in their vicinity as victims. People are literally throwing molotov cocktails into establishments that...

www.yahoo.com

I guess you missed the part where it states the bill passed with 170 Republicans voting FOR it.

 

[Darkwind]

Apparently you don’t give a shit about kids either. Yikes!

I do. Not at the expense of 300 million other people.

Trading one life for another is a Democrat thing

If you cared about the kids, then you would demand a separate bill that deals ONLY with the kids.

 

[Billy000]

OK

here'ws an idea.

Read the bill, and see if there is any pork in it.

Then start running your mouth.

If someone actually identified what the actual pork in question is, I would. Otherwise how am I going to know how republicans define pork?

 

[Billy000]

I guess you missed the part where it states the bill passed with 170 Republicans voting FOR it.

This is in reference to the hypocrites who call gay people groomers and only pretend to care about kids.

 

[Darkwind]

If someone actually identified what the actual pork in question is, I would. Otherwise how am I going to know how republicans define pork

Why not demand that we have single-subject legislation? Why run your corrupt mouth off when you don't ensure that the people who need programs can get them without playing three card monte?

 

[Auld Phart]

If someone actually identified what the actual pork in question is, I would. Otherwise how am I going to know how republicans define pork?

Otherwise how am I going to know how republicans define pork?

easy

get a brain transplant.


Upgrade to at least a chimps mentality

 

[TNHarley]

You have no idea whats in the bill, but you regurgitate them talking points anyways LOLZ

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

If someone actually identified what the actual pork in question is, I would. Otherwise how am I going to know how republicans define pork?

.



Being disingenuous must be your superpower.




.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

If a Democrat proposes a bill to protect children it will undoubtedly serve the real purpose of making pint sized gay prostitutes. No one has actually thrown molotov cocktails at drag queens. But they should. Those would be absolute American heroes.

 

[Darkwind]

This is in reference to the hypocrites who call gay people groomers and only pretend to care about kids.

This is a lie. We call people teaching inappropriate sexual material to children without parental approval groomers.

You know, those who are prepping children to choose sex change surgery rather than how to add.

 

[Darkwind]

.



Being disingenuous must be your superpower.




.

Naw, his superpower is being a fuckwit.

 

[Ralph Norton]

This is in reference to the hypocrites who call gay people groomers and only pretend to care about kids.

Is it? Or is it just in reference to "anything the GOP votes against"?
Because clearly, the GOP didn't.

 

[Billy000]

Why not demand that we have single-subject legislation? Why run your corrupt mouth off when you don't ensure that the people who need programs can get them without playing three card monte?

You have no idea whats in the bill, but you regurgitate them talking points anyways LOLZ

But conversely, none of you have identified what the pork is even if it did exist.

 

[Billy000]

Is it? Or is it just in reference to "anything the GOP votes against"?
Because clearly, the GOP didn't.

Why does that have to mean all republicans? It’s a common sense bill that 28 republicans voted against lol