Jon
The CPA
LOL! You people make me laugh. So much assuming.
btw, jsanders...it almost sounds like you're advocating for even higher taxes because that means people will work less therefore creating jobs for others.
Wrong. I'm saying that every economical argument has a good and a bad side. I don't even mind higher tax rates, as long as the money earned is being spent wisely. This administration is not spending money wisely. They are literally taking from the wealthy to give to the poor. I would pay 40% of my income if I knew it was going to actually pay off the debt. This administration is not paying off the debt. They are subsidizing the lives of the poor, hoping that controlling the country will lead to an economical boom that will automatically reduce the debt. It's a ridiculous method of debt reduction. If you want to reduce the debt, PAY IT OFF. If you're going to earn more tax revenue, SPEND IT ON THE DEBT. Don't spend our income taxes on programs that only benefit those who don't even work to benefit themselves. Those people aren't even affected by the size of the debt nor the state of the economy. They get their government handouts no matter how piss poor things are. Those of us who actually work are affected by the economy, and we're the ones who have to pay off the debt. Yet all of our income taxes levied are going to benefit others.
FYI ....65% of the people on welfare now that are not working... are children.
1. I don't believe you. I need proof.
2. There are a lot of disclaimers in that simple sentence. 65% of people on welfare THAT ARE NOT WORKING are children. So...there are people on welfare who ARE working? Why?
3. Finally, I don't care if they ARE children. Not that I'd let starving children die, but if you get the PARENTS off welfare, the kids come off, too. What a horrible argument you've made.