235 Years

[CrusaderFrank]

 

[Billiejeens]

Biden starts offing his opponents like the wise latina is predicting, I would hope at least of few of your cult in the Senate would have some integrity and remove him from office.

He would be in prison.

 

[Billiejeens]

A bunch of them are still trying to gaslight us that Biden is still fit as a fiddle. JFC, buy some integrity already.

No chance

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The official act is the pardon dummy. Reason for the act can't be prosecuted according to the rulling.

Bribery is only an Official Act if your name is Joe Biden

 

[Billiejeens]

It is what it said.

Any excercise of core POTUS powers (like pardons, control of DOJ, etc), according to conservative majority cannot be questioned by the prosecutors. A president can take a bribe for such official act and can never face criminal prosecution for it, because the prosecutors must presume that reguardless of payment President did it as part of official bussiness, not personal gain.

No
As always with you.
You are a joke
Nothing more.

 

[ThisIsMe]

George Washington's first term began in 1789. Since then, 235 years, no President has asked for absolute immunity, much less received it.

I wonder why it's needed, so badly, now.

Let me guess: It involves victimhood.

President Washington's First Term (1789-1792)

www.mountvernon.org

https://constitution.findlaw.com/article2/article-ii--presidential-immunity-to-criminal-and-civil-suits.html#:~:text=Is%20the%20President%20Immune%20from,actions%20arising%20from%20unofficial%20conduct.

 

[AntonToo]

Bribery is only an Official Act if your name is Joe Biden

Presidential pardon is an official act.

Get back to me when you can understand such simple concepts.

 

[struth]

Presidential pardon is an official act.

Get back to me when you can understand such simple concepts.

Yes but taking bribes isn’t. How is that lost on you?

 

[AntonToo]

Yes but taking bribes isn’t. How is that lost on you?

An official act, even if done for personal gain, can't be criminally prosecuted according to this ruling.

Presidents can't be prosecuted for actions relating to the core powers of their office.

Do you get it or will we have to have a few more round abouts?

 

[struth]

An official act, even if done for personal gain, can't be criminally prosecuted according to this ruling.

Presidents can't be prosecuted for actions relating to the core powers of their office.

Do you get it or will we have to have a few more round abouts?

Yeah but bribery is not an official act

 

[Missouri_Mike]

George Washington's first term began in 1789. Since then, 235 years, no President has asked for absolute immunity, much less received it.

I wonder why it's needed, so badly, now.

Let me guess: It involves victimhood.

President Washington's First Term (1789-1792)

www.mountvernon.org

235 years ago the democrats weren’t trying to use lawfare to send Washington to prison. 235 years ago democrats weren’t as bad as they are today.

 

[AntonToo]

Yeah but bribery is not an official act

What bribery without a questionable official act, dumbass?

Quid Pro Quo is not a prosecutable scheme without being able to connect the Quid to the Quo of the official act.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

It started to unravel when the GOP packed the court with right wing politicians.

Oh no. The government has to act within the Constitutional restraints. That’s horrible. We could have had a left wing court granting all authority to unelected admin’s instead. That would have been so awesome. We could have been ruled by some idiot in an office somewhere. It’s sad we passed on that.

 

[Lastamender]

George Washington's first term began in 1789. Since then, 235 years, no President has asked for absolute immunity, much less received it.

I wonder why it's needed, so badly, now.

Let me guess: It involves victimhood.

President Washington's First Term (1789-1792)

www.mountvernon.org

The hack is triggered. Everyone stand back and watch him make a fool of himself.

 

[struth]

What bribery without a questionable official act, dumbass?

Quid Pro Quo is not a prosecutable scheme without being able to connect the Quid to the Quo of the official act.

Bribery is not an official act

 

[SweetSue92]

There’s no basis for criminal charges. The president was acting as commander in chief of the military with the authorization of Congress to go after OBL.

It’s insane to think this could be criminal.

Congress has not approved a war in how many decades, exactly?

 

[AntonToo]

Bribery is not an official act

You obviously are not bright enought to understand what bribery is and imagine that payment itself is somehow prosecutable without questioning the official act its for.

 

[struth]

And you aren't too bright, it is what it is.

Bright enough to know I don’t want anyone that thinks bribery is an official act anywhere never an elected office

 

[AntonToo]

Bright enough to know I don’t want anyone that thinks bribery is an official act anywhere never an elected office

You are an idiot and have no bussiness arguing legal matters.

Know thyself.

 

[struth]

You are an idiot and have no bussiness arguing legal matters.

Know thyself.

Says the clown that things bribery is an official act