21 to buy an AR? The ignorance of Democrats and the anti-gun left.

[Dagosa]

Not wrong. @M14 Shooter is correct. A pump shotgun can kill just as many people just as fast.

So now there are two ignorant gun a holics.

 

[Open Bolt]

That’s BS. It excludes unqualified people; the SC has said so in every firearm decision.

Individuals are excluded only through due process. The rest of the populace has the right to keep and bear arms.

So now there are two ignorant gun a holics.

No ignorance on our end. You are the one who keeps making incorrect statements.

 

[Dagosa]

Individuals are excluded only through due process. The rest of the populace has the right to keep and bear arms.



No ignorance on our end. You are the one who keeps making incorrect statements.

Nope. They are excluded for NOT HAVING PERMITS, AGE REQUIREMENTS, LICENSES and for a plethora of locations. Try boarding a plane with one or attending a Trump rally .

 

[Dagosa]

Individuals are excluded only through due process. The rest of the populace has the right to keep and bear arms.



No ignorance on our end. You are the one who keeps making incorrect statements.

It’s utterly stupid to imply shot guns are as effective as military assault based weapons. Dufus, if they were, they would be primary issue for the military. They are a lot cheaper you dumbos.

 

[Dagosa]

Individuals are excluded only through due process. The rest of the populace has the right to keep and bear arms.



No ignorance on our end. You are the one who keeps making incorrect statements.

Due process ? Utterly wrong. Firearms are restricted in every state in the union for every average law abiding adult. No one is excluded from firearm regulations. No one, nix nada….

 

[Open Bolt]

Nope. They are excluded for NOT HAVING PERMITS, AGE REQUIREMENTS, LICENSES and for a plethora of locations. Try boarding a plane with one or attending a Trump rally .

Shall-issue permits and licensing do not exclude law-abiding adults. May issue permits and licensing are unconstitutional.

Gun free zones are limited in scope (or else they are unconstitutional). They do not prevent people from carrying guns in general.

Minors have not yet attained all the rights of adulthood.

It’s utterly stupid to imply shot guns are as effective as military assault based weapons.

No one said anything about military weapons. The term "assault weapons" was in quotes because it was referring to ordinary hunting rifles like the AR-15.

That said, for the purposes of massacring people at close range, pump shotguns would probably be pretty close in effectiveness to a military assault weapon.

Dufus,

Childish name-calling shows the weakness of your position.

if they were, they would be primary issue for the military.

The military uses guns for purposes other than slaughtering people at close range.

They are a lot cheaper

Not really.

you dumbos.

Childish name-calling shows the weakness of your position.

Due process ? Utterly wrong.

Not wrong. Due process is the only way to remove someone's rights in America.

Firearms are restricted in every state in the union for every average law abiding adult.

Any such restrictions do not prevent law-abiding adults from having guns. If they did, they would be struck down as unconstitutional.

No one is excluded from firearm regulations. No one, nix nada….

Firearms regulations in America do not prevent law abiding adults from having guns. If they did, they would be struck down as unconstitutional.

 

[Dagosa]

Shall-issue permits and licensing do not exclude law-abiding adults. May issue permits and licensing are unconstitutional.

Gun free zones are limited in scope (or else they are unconstitutional). They do not prevent people from carrying guns in general.

Minors have not yet attained all the rights of adulthood.



No one said anything about military weapons. The term "assault weapons" was in quotes because it was referring to ordinary hunting rifles like the AR-15.

That said, for the purposes of massacring people at close range, pump shotguns would probably be pretty close in effectiveness to a military assault weapon.



Childish name-calling shows the weakness of your position.



The military uses guns for purposes other than slaughtering people at close range.



Not really.



Childish name-calling shows the weakness of your position.



Not wrong. Due process is the only way to remove someone's rights in America.



Any such restrictions do not prevent law-abiding adults from having guns. If they did, they would be struck down as unconstitutional.



Firearms regulations in America do not prevent law abiding adults from having guns. If they did, they would be struck down as unconstitutional.

This the post is hilariously ignorant, uninformed and down right pretentious.

This is post of a lunatic; all these provisions as “unconstitutional “
That’s fking hilarious. According to the CONSTITUTION, the SC is the final arbiter of the constitution along with the governing bodies. Until changed dufus, every decsion by them IS CONSTITUTIONAL.
Their decisions until changed become part of the constitution. Any fool knows amendments are part of the constitution. Geesus, you live in a dream world.
How long have you lived in this fking dream world ?

We’ll say this slowly.
“When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional issue, that judgment is virtually final; its decisions can be altered only by the rarely used procedure of constitutional amendment or by a new ruling of the Court.”

 

[Dagosa]

Firearms regulations in America do not prevent law abiding adults from having guns. If they did, they would be struck down as unconstitutional.

BS. You know absolutely nothing. What are you, a completely uninformed ? At least use the correct terms. “Having” a firearm means nothing in law. You either “possess” a fiream or have “ownership.” Try to talk like you know what it is you’re trying falsely claim.

 

[Dagosa]

Individuals are excluded only through due process.

Gee. How many times are you going to say “ due process” and not know what you’re talking about.

 

[Open Bolt]

Gee. How many times are you going to say “ due process” and not know what you’re talking about.

You are the only person here who does not know what he is talking about.

 

[Open Bolt]

BS. You know absolutely nothing. What are you, a completely uninformed ?

Note again that you are the one who keeps making incorrect statements.

No one has been able to point out any untrue statements in my posts.

At least use the correct terms. “Having” a firearm means nothing in law. You either “possess” a fiream or have “ownership.”

Nonsense. "Having" is a perfectly appropriate term.

Do you need help figuring out how to use a dictionary?

Try to talk like you know what it is you’re trying falsely claim.

You are the only person here who has made false claims.

 

[Open Bolt]

This the post is hilariously ignorant, uninformed and down right pretentious.

Wrong again. Everything I said is correct. You are the only person here who doesn't know what he is talking about.

This is post of a lunatic; all these provisions as “unconstitutional “

Your hatred of freedom (the 9/11 attackers hated our freedom too) is what is lunatic. There is nothing crazy about me speaking in support of freedom and civil liberties.

That’s fking hilarious. According to the CONSTITUTION, the SC is the final arbiter of the constitution along with the governing bodies. Until changed dufus,

Your reliance on childish name-calling instead of relying on facts and logic should tell you something about the bankruptcy of your position.

every decsion by them IS CONSTITUTIONAL.

Wrong again. When the supreme court issues decisions that are contrary to the Constitution, those decisions are wrong.

But if you do blindly accept that all their decisions are constitutional, then I guess you have no complaints about any of their recent decisions?

Their decisions until changed become part of the constitution.

No. The Constitution is only what is written.

Any fool knows amendments are part of the constitution.

Supreme Court rulings are not Constitutional amendments.

Geesus, you live in a dream world.
How long have you lived in this fking dream world ?

What you call a dream world is what everyone else calls reality.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The House passes a gun control bill in response to the Buffalo and Uvalde shootings

It has almost no chance of becoming law as the Senate pursues negotiations focused on improving mental health programs, bolstering school security and enhancing background checks.

www.npr.org

The house passed a bill that raises the age to buy semi-automatic rifles to 21.
It has no chance in the Senate, but if it does pass, let's consider this for a moment:

You need to be 21 to buy an AR15.
You only need to be 18 to buy an M16. Or M60. or M2HB Or XM134.

Irony? Ignorance? Idiocy?
You decide.

Wrong.

The ignorance of Republicans and the dishonest, anti-truth right.

Those under 21 will still be able to acquire AR 15s via intra-state face-to-face sales and gifting.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

all semi automatic rifles would require a person to be 21 or older to purchase.

From an FFL.

Not from a private party.

Those 18 to 20 may purchase and possess AR 15s, even if this measure were signed into law.

It’s a lie to claim that those 18 to 20 would be comprehensively prohibited from buying and possessing AR 15s.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Oleg Volk FTW!

No, for the lie.

The Hitler gun control lie

Gun rights activists who cite the dictator as a reason against gun control have their history dangerously wrong

www.salon.com

 

[miketx]

You can refuse for a short while. It is largely a fantasy that you'd be able to hold out very long against the US government. Ruby Ridge and Waco are good examples.

I don't give a fuck, commie.

 

[miketx]

No, for the lie.

The Hitler gun control lie

Gun rights activists who cite the dictator as a reason against gun control have their history dangerously wrong

www.salon.com

Your one of the biggest liars here.

 

[Dagosa]

Wrong again. Everything I said is correct. You are the only person here who doesn't know what he is talking about.



Your hatred of freedom (the 9/11 attackers hated our freedom too) is what is lunatic. There is nothing crazy about me speaking in support of freedom and civil liberties.



Your reliance on childish name-calling instead of relying on facts and logic should tell you something about the bankruptcy of your position.



Wrong again. When the supreme court issues decisions that are contrary to the Constitution, those decisions are wrong.

But if you do blindly accept that all their decisions are constitutional, then I guess you have no complaints about any of their recent decisions?



No. The Constitution is only what is written.



Supreme Court rulings are not Constitutional amendments.



What you call a dream world is what everyone else calls reality.

Utter babble. Your knowledge of constitutional law is on the level of Trump. Try to get a grip and do some research.

 

[Dagosa]

Wrong again. Everything I said is correct. You are the only person here who doesn't know what he is talking about.



Your hatred of freedom (the 9/11 attackers hated our freedom too) is what is lunatic. There is nothing crazy about me speaking in support of freedom and civil liberties.



Your reliance on childish name-calling instead of relying on facts and logic should tell you something about the bankruptcy of your position.



Wrong again. When the supreme court issues decisions that are contrary to the Constitution, those decisions are wrong.

But if you do blindly accept that all their decisions are constitutional, then I guess you have no complaints about any of their recent decisions?



No. The Constitution is only what is written.



Supreme Court rulings are not Constitutional amendments.



What you call a dream world is what everyone else calls reality.

You have nothing better to do then spread tripe ?

 

[miketx]

Utter babble. Your knowledge of constitutional law is on the level of Trump. Try to get a grip and do some research.

Hey, I got an idea, STOP LYING!