Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 21,649
- 5,814
- 198
So now there are two ignorant gun a holics.Not wrong. @M14 Shooter is correct. A pump shotgun can kill just as many people just as fast.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So now there are two ignorant gun a holics.Not wrong. @M14 Shooter is correct. A pump shotgun can kill just as many people just as fast.
Individuals are excluded only through due process. The rest of the populace has the right to keep and bear arms.That’s BS. It excludes unqualified people; the SC has said so in every firearm decision.
No ignorance on our end. You are the one who keeps making incorrect statements.So now there are two ignorant gun a holics.
Nope. They are excluded for NOT HAVING PERMITS, AGE REQUIREMENTS, LICENSES and for a plethora of locations. Try boarding a plane with one or attending a Trump rally .Individuals are excluded only through due process. The rest of the populace has the right to keep and bear arms.
No ignorance on our end. You are the one who keeps making incorrect statements.
It’s utterly stupid to imply shot guns are as effective as military assault based weapons. Dufus, if they were, they would be primary issue for the military. They are a lot cheaper you dumbos.Individuals are excluded only through due process. The rest of the populace has the right to keep and bear arms.
No ignorance on our end. You are the one who keeps making incorrect statements.
Due process ? Utterly wrong. Firearms are restricted in every state in the union for every average law abiding adult. No one is excluded from firearm regulations. No one, nix nada….Individuals are excluded only through due process. The rest of the populace has the right to keep and bear arms.
No ignorance on our end. You are the one who keeps making incorrect statements.
Shall-issue permits and licensing do not exclude law-abiding adults. May issue permits and licensing are unconstitutional.Nope. They are excluded for NOT HAVING PERMITS, AGE REQUIREMENTS, LICENSES and for a plethora of locations. Try boarding a plane with one or attending a Trump rally .
No one said anything about military weapons. The term "assault weapons" was in quotes because it was referring to ordinary hunting rifles like the AR-15.It’s utterly stupid to imply shot guns are as effective as military assault based weapons.
Childish name-calling shows the weakness of your position.Dufus,
The military uses guns for purposes other than slaughtering people at close range.if they were, they would be primary issue for the military.
Not really.They are a lot cheaper
Childish name-calling shows the weakness of your position.you dumbos.
Not wrong. Due process is the only way to remove someone's rights in America.Due process ? Utterly wrong.
Any such restrictions do not prevent law-abiding adults from having guns. If they did, they would be struck down as unconstitutional.Firearms are restricted in every state in the union for every average law abiding adult.
Firearms regulations in America do not prevent law abiding adults from having guns. If they did, they would be struck down as unconstitutional.No one is excluded from firearm regulations. No one, nix nada….
This the post is hilariously ignorant, uninformed and down right pretentious.Shall-issue permits and licensing do not exclude law-abiding adults. May issue permits and licensing are unconstitutional.
Gun free zones are limited in scope (or else they are unconstitutional). They do not prevent people from carrying guns in general.
Minors have not yet attained all the rights of adulthood.
No one said anything about military weapons. The term "assault weapons" was in quotes because it was referring to ordinary hunting rifles like the AR-15.
That said, for the purposes of massacring people at close range, pump shotguns would probably be pretty close in effectiveness to a military assault weapon.
Childish name-calling shows the weakness of your position.
The military uses guns for purposes other than slaughtering people at close range.
Not really.
Childish name-calling shows the weakness of your position.
Not wrong. Due process is the only way to remove someone's rights in America.
Any such restrictions do not prevent law-abiding adults from having guns. If they did, they would be struck down as unconstitutional.
Firearms regulations in America do not prevent law abiding adults from having guns. If they did, they would be struck down as unconstitutional.
BS. You know absolutely nothing. What are you, a completely uninformed ? At least use the correct terms. “Having” a firearm means nothing in law. You either “possess” a fiream or have “ownership.” Try to talk like you know what it is you’re trying falsely claim.Firearms regulations in America do not prevent law abiding adults from having guns. If they did, they would be struck down as unconstitutional.
Gee. How many times are you going to say “ due process” and not know what you’re talking about.Individuals are excluded only through due process.
You are the only person here who does not know what he is talking about.Gee. How many times are you going to say “ due process” and not know what you’re talking about.
Note again that you are the one who keeps making incorrect statements.BS. You know absolutely nothing. What are you, a completely uninformed ?
Nonsense. "Having" is a perfectly appropriate term.At least use the correct terms. “Having” a firearm means nothing in law. You either “possess” a fiream or have “ownership.”
You are the only person here who has made false claims.Try to talk like you know what it is you’re trying falsely claim.
Wrong again. Everything I said is correct. You are the only person here who doesn't know what he is talking about.This the post is hilariously ignorant, uninformed and down right pretentious.
Your hatred of freedom (the 9/11 attackers hated our freedom too) is what is lunatic. There is nothing crazy about me speaking in support of freedom and civil liberties.This is post of a lunatic; all these provisions as “unconstitutional “
Your reliance on childish name-calling instead of relying on facts and logic should tell you something about the bankruptcy of your position.That’s fking hilarious. According to the CONSTITUTION, the SC is the final arbiter of the constitution along with the governing bodies. Until changed dufus,
Wrong again. When the supreme court issues decisions that are contrary to the Constitution, those decisions are wrong.every decsion by them IS CONSTITUTIONAL.
No. The Constitution is only what is written.Their decisions until changed become part of the constitution.
Supreme Court rulings are not Constitutional amendments.Any fool knows amendments are part of the constitution.
What you call a dream world is what everyone else calls reality.Geesus, you live in a dream world.
How long have you lived in this fking dream world ?
Wrong.The House passes a gun control bill in response to the Buffalo and Uvalde shootings
It has almost no chance of becoming law as the Senate pursues negotiations focused on improving mental health programs, bolstering school security and enhancing background checks.www.npr.org
The house passed a bill that raises the age to buy semi-automatic rifles to 21.
It has no chance in the Senate, but if it does pass, let's consider this for a moment:
You need to be 21 to buy an AR15.
You only need to be 18 to buy an M16. Or M60. or M2HB Or XM134.
Irony? Ignorance? Idiocy?
You decide.
From an FFL.all semi automatic rifles would require a person to be 21 or older to purchase.
No, for the lie.Oleg Volk FTW!
Your one of the biggest liars here.No, for the lie.
The Hitler gun control lie
Gun rights activists who cite the dictator as a reason against gun control have their history dangerously wrongwww.salon.com
Utter babble. Your knowledge of constitutional law is on the level of Trump. Try to get a grip and do some research.Wrong again. Everything I said is correct. You are the only person here who doesn't know what he is talking about.
Your hatred of freedom (the 9/11 attackers hated our freedom too) is what is lunatic. There is nothing crazy about me speaking in support of freedom and civil liberties.
Your reliance on childish name-calling instead of relying on facts and logic should tell you something about the bankruptcy of your position.
Wrong again. When the supreme court issues decisions that are contrary to the Constitution, those decisions are wrong.
But if you do blindly accept that all their decisions are constitutional, then I guess you have no complaints about any of their recent decisions?
No. The Constitution is only what is written.
Supreme Court rulings are not Constitutional amendments.
What you call a dream world is what everyone else calls reality.
You have nothing better to do then spread tripe ?Wrong again. Everything I said is correct. You are the only person here who doesn't know what he is talking about.
Your hatred of freedom (the 9/11 attackers hated our freedom too) is what is lunatic. There is nothing crazy about me speaking in support of freedom and civil liberties.
Your reliance on childish name-calling instead of relying on facts and logic should tell you something about the bankruptcy of your position.
Wrong again. When the supreme court issues decisions that are contrary to the Constitution, those decisions are wrong.
But if you do blindly accept that all their decisions are constitutional, then I guess you have no complaints about any of their recent decisions?
No. The Constitution is only what is written.
Supreme Court rulings are not Constitutional amendments.
What you call a dream world is what everyone else calls reality.