2016: Conservatism WON the presidential popular vote

[owebo]

Of the various forms for electing a president that was considered, the process the Founders had chosen is actually considered to be the most balanced in overall proper representation of the states and people as a whole.

Pretty hard to be balanced when a vote in Wyoming is worth almost three times that of somebody in California. For some reason, a lot of people on this site think it's a sin to be a New Yorker, Texan or Californian and that those in the smaller states who have more power are somehow more deserving of more representation at federal level. Why? I have no idea.

You prefer to keep flying over them? Do so at your own peril.....

 

[jillian]

Of the various forms for electing a president that was considered, the process the Founders had chosen is actually considered to be the most balanced in overall proper representation of the states and people as a whole.

Pretty hard to be balanced when a vote in Wyoming is worth almost three times that of somebody in California. For some reason, a lot of people on this site think it's a sin to be a New Yorker, Texan or Californian and that those in the smaller states who have more power are somehow more deserving of more representation at federal level. Why? I have no idea.

You prefer to keep flying over them? Do so at your own peril.....

try responding to his post, troll boy

 

[owebo]

Of the various forms for electing a president that was considered, the process the Founders had chosen is actually considered to be the most balanced in overall proper representation of the states and people as a whole.

Pretty hard to be balanced when a vote in Wyoming is worth almost three times that of somebody in California. For some reason, a lot of people on this site think it's a sin to be a New Yorker, Texan or Californian and that those in the smaller states who have more power are somehow more deserving of more representation at federal level. Why? I have no idea.

You prefer to keep flying over them? Do so at your own peril.....

try responding to his post, troll boy

It was,over your collective head....as evidenced this past election....

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Of the various forms for electing a president that was considered, the process the Founders had chosen is actually considered to be the most balanced in overall proper representation of the states and people as a whole.

Pretty hard to be balanced when a vote in Wyoming is worth almost three times that of somebody in California. For some reason, a lot of people on this site think it's a sin to be a New Yorker, Texan or Californian and that those in the smaller states who have more power are somehow more deserving of more representation at federal level. Why? I have no idea.

Obviously you don't know the purpose behind the electoral college, its very balanced. What do they teach in American history these days?

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Of the various forms for electing a president that was considered, the process the Founders had chosen is actually considered to be the most balanced in overall proper representation of the states and people as a whole.

Pretty hard to be balanced when a vote in Wyoming is worth almost three times that of somebody in California. For some reason, a lot of people on this site think it's a sin to be a New Yorker, Texan or Californian and that those in the smaller states who have more power are somehow more deserving of more representation at federal level. Why? I have no idea.

You prefer to keep flying over them? Do so at your own peril.....

try responding to his post, troll boy

Because it's a subject that's "normally" covered by the time they reach high school, if we don't waste it pushing liberal political issues on elementary school kids.

 

[Dr Grump]

Obviously you don't know the purpose behind the electoral college, its very balanced. What do they teach in American history these days?

Couple of things:
1) I am not American
2) I am very well versed in the EC
3) It is far from balanced, which unsurprisingly seems okay by those in rural areas who are usually conservative voters.

 

[jillian]

Of the various forms for electing a president that was considered, the process the Founders had chosen is actually considered to be the most balanced in overall proper representation of the states and people as a whole.

Pretty hard to be balanced when a vote in Wyoming is worth almost three times that of somebody in California. For some reason, a lot of people on this site think it's a sin to be a New Yorker, Texan or Californian and that those in the smaller states who have more power are somehow more deserving of more representation at federal level. Why? I have no idea.

You prefer to keep flying over them? Do so at your own peril.....

try responding to his post, troll boy

Because it's a subject that's "normally" covered by the time they reach high school, if we don't waste it pushing liberal political issues on elementary school kids.

you mean telling them liberal things like science exists?

what on earth are you talking about?

 

[owebo]

Of the various forms for electing a president that was considered, the process the Founders had chosen is actually considered to be the most balanced in overall proper representation of the states and people as a whole.

Pretty hard to be balanced when a vote in Wyoming is worth almost three times that of somebody in California. For some reason, a lot of people on this site think it's a sin to be a New Yorker, Texan or Californian and that those in the smaller states who have more power are somehow more deserving of more representation at federal level. Why? I have no idea.

You prefer to keep flying over them? Do so at your own peril.....

try responding to his post, troll boy

Because it's a subject that's "normally" covered by the time they reach high school, if we don't waste it pushing liberal political issues on elementary school kids.

you mean telling them liberal things like science exists?

what on earth are you talking about?

You mean settled science....liberals only believe settled science exists....

 

[owebo]

Obviously you don't know the purpose behind the electoral college, its very balanced. What do they teach in American history these days?

Couple of things:
1) I am not American
2) I am very well versed in the EC
3) It is far from balanced, which unsurprisingly seems okay by those in rural areas who are usually conservative voters.

Thank god....

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Of the various forms for electing a president that was considered, the process the Founders had chosen is actually considered to be the most balanced in overall proper representation of the states and people as a whole.

Pretty hard to be balanced when a vote in Wyoming is worth almost three times that of somebody in California. For some reason, a lot of people on this site think it's a sin to be a New Yorker, Texan or Californian and that those in the smaller states who have more power are somehow more deserving of more representation at federal level. Why? I have no idea.

You prefer to keep flying over them? Do so at your own peril.....

try responding to his post, troll boy

Because it's a subject that's "normally" covered by the time they reach high school, if we don't waste it pushing liberal political issues on elementary school kids.

you mean telling them liberal things like science exists?

what on earth are you talking about?

Liberals who try to bring issues on the national and state level and, in an attempt to find and introduce greater acceptance, indoctrinate the minds of young kids to their perception of the debate (such as transgender sexual orientation issues as one example). This is an example of how the left injects their political view topic into an elementary school, that children do not need to be involved in the middle of and exposed to. If you want to indoctrinate your political view of government and our nation to impressionable young minds, you are actually no different than religious conservatives that want to indoctrinate the need for discussing religion topics to bring a better sense of "morality" to our school children and our nation.. in short - Ideological political views and religion have no place in public schools.

 

[jillian]

Pretty hard to be balanced when a vote in Wyoming is worth almost three times that of somebody in California. For some reason, a lot of people on this site think it's a sin to be a New Yorker, Texan or Californian and that those in the smaller states who have more power are somehow more deserving of more representation at federal level. Why? I have no idea.

You prefer to keep flying over them? Do so at your own peril.....

try responding to his post, troll boy

Because it's a subject that's "normally" covered by the time they reach high school, if we don't waste it pushing liberal political issues on elementary school kids.

you mean telling them liberal things like science exists?

what on earth are you talking about?

You mean settled science....liberals only believe settled science exists....

what are you blathering about wackadoodle?

 

[jillian]

Pretty hard to be balanced when a vote in Wyoming is worth almost three times that of somebody in California. For some reason, a lot of people on this site think it's a sin to be a New Yorker, Texan or Californian and that those in the smaller states who have more power are somehow more deserving of more representation at federal level. Why? I have no idea.

You prefer to keep flying over them? Do so at your own peril.....

try responding to his post, troll boy

Because it's a subject that's "normally" covered by the time they reach high school, if we don't waste it pushing liberal political issues on elementary school kids.

you mean telling them liberal things like science exists?

what on earth are you talking about?

Liberals who try to bring issues on the national and state level and, in an attempt to find and introduce greater acceptance, indoctrinate the minds of young kids to their perception of the debate (such as transgender sexual orientation issues as one example). This is an example of how the left injects their political view topic into an elementary school, that children do not need to be involved in the middle of and exposed to. If you want to indoctrinate your political view of government and our nation to impressionable young minds, you are actually no different than religious conservatives that want to indoctrinate the need for discussing religion topics to bring a better sense of "morality" to our school children and our nation.. in short - Ideological political views and religion have no place in public schools.

you mean liberals are political?

duh....

because rightwwingnuts aren't? at least we don't pretend science doesn't exist and try to leave people stupid and uneducated so they vote for rightwingnuts

 

[Dr Grump]

Liberals who try to bring issues on the national and state level and, in an attempt to find and introduce greater acceptance, indoctrinate the minds of young kids to their perception of the debate (such as transgender sexual orientation issues as one example). This is an example of how the left injects their political view topic into an elementary school, that children do not need to be involved in the middle of and exposed to. If you want to indoctrinate your political view of government and our nation to impressionable young minds, you are actually no different than religious conservatives that want to indoctrinate the need for discussing religion topics to bring a better sense of "morality" to our school children and our nation..

Total utter BS. So you would rather young kids be indoctrinated into your POV? That being black is bad? That being gay is bad? Your analogy is BS. That's like saying to young kids in 1859 slavery was okay. Do you actually believe the shit you type?

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

You prefer to keep flying over them? Do so at your own peril.....

try responding to his post, troll boy

Because it's a subject that's "normally" covered by the time they reach high school, if we don't waste it pushing liberal political issues on elementary school kids.

you mean telling them liberal things like science exists?

what on earth are you talking about?

Liberals who try to bring issues on the national and state level and, in an attempt to find and introduce greater acceptance, indoctrinate the minds of young kids to their perception of the debate (such as transgender sexual orientation issues as one example). This is an example of how the left injects their political view topic into an elementary school, that children do not need to be involved in the middle of and exposed to. If you want to indoctrinate your political view of government and our nation to impressionable young minds, you are actually no different than religious conservatives that want to indoctrinate the need for discussing religion topics to bring a better sense of "morality" to our school children and our nation.. in short - Ideological political views and religion have no place in public schools.

you mean liberals are political?

duh....

because rightwwingnuts aren't? at least we don't pretend science doesn't exist and try to leave people stupid and uneducated so they vote for rightwingnuts

Again, that's why there is a need to have a market for tape measures with fractions for all the high school graduates that don't know how to read one. Had the public school system produced "qualified" graduates who can be productive in obtaining a job in the real world, of those who's grades haven't earned them a college position, there wouldn't be a need for programs like "no child left behind to check their progress. We would also not find job applicants requiring the federal government to dumb down placement exams in order to obtain a position in a career choice they want to pursue. That is our "current" end result of liberals interjecting their influence into our nation's public school system.

Congratulations on your effort liberals.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Liberals who try to bring issues on the national and state level and, in an attempt to find and introduce greater acceptance, indoctrinate the minds of young kids to their perception of the debate (such as transgender sexual orientation issues as one example). This is an example of how the left injects their political view topic into an elementary school, that children do not need to be involved in the middle of and exposed to. If you want to indoctrinate your political view of government and our nation to impressionable young minds, you are actually no different than religious conservatives that want to indoctrinate the need for discussing religion topics to bring a better sense of "morality" to our school children and our nation..

Total utter BS. So you would rather young kids be indoctrinated into your POV? That being black is bad? That being gay is bad? Your analogy is BS. That's like saying to young kids in 1859 slavery was okay. Do you actually believe the shit you type?

No, I'd rather have graduates educated in american history, Algebra, chemistry, physics, fluency in foreign languages, world history, literacy, and even the most basic skills such as reading a ruler and fractions. These are the list of skills our graduates need to be productive in the real world without the need to depend on our federal government to provide for you. Instead we have adults needing our government to dumb down career entry exams, because other liberal agendas placed in our public schools are deemed more important than "educated skills" to obtain skilled employment. We need to be pursuing real education over liberal political indoctrination.

 

[OKTexas]

67% of the States said they did, that was more than enough.

Why would that matter?

LMAO, remind the class who's being inaugurated on Jan 20. What do you not understand about more than enough? 304 EVs. LOL

That is a totally different subject. Everybody knows Trump will be inaugurated. We are discussing whether the majority of the voters in the country want that to happen, and you can't accept the fact that the numbers say they don't.

Feel free to keep rambling about totally irrelevant shit, I don't care, won't change reality.

Irrelevant as far as who is inaugurated. Totally relevant as far as the country accepting him as the legitimate president who intends to represent the entire country

He was duly elected according to the Constitution, you can't get more legitimate than than fuck head. I think you need a new supply of buthurt cream.

 

[OKTexas]

You prefer to keep flying over them? Do so at your own peril.....

try responding to his post, troll boy

Because it's a subject that's "normally" covered by the time they reach high school, if we don't waste it pushing liberal political issues on elementary school kids.

you mean telling them liberal things like science exists?

what on earth are you talking about?

Liberals who try to bring issues on the national and state level and, in an attempt to find and introduce greater acceptance, indoctrinate the minds of young kids to their perception of the debate (such as transgender sexual orientation issues as one example). This is an example of how the left injects their political view topic into an elementary school, that children do not need to be involved in the middle of and exposed to. If you want to indoctrinate your political view of government and our nation to impressionable young minds, you are actually no different than religious conservatives that want to indoctrinate the need for discussing religion topics to bring a better sense of "morality" to our school children and our nation.. in short - Ideological political views and religion have no place in public schools.

you mean liberals are political?

duh....

because rightwwingnuts aren't? at least we don't pretend science doesn't exist and try to leave people stupid and uneducated so they vote for rightwingnuts

You mean science like "Billy has two daddies", LMAO Which is scientifically impossible.

 

[Papageorgio]

You couldn't say that about Clinton either.

Yes, Trump won. No he didn't deserve to win.

No he didn't and neither did Hillary. They are both bad choices.

Yet, she still got more votes. Trump was not, and is not the choice of the voters

Hillary received less than 50% of the votes and not a clear choice of anyone, terrible choices.

Yet still about 3 million more than Trump.

But not the people's choice either.

 

[Papageorgio]

You prefer to keep flying over them? Do so at your own peril.....

try responding to his post, troll boy

Because it's a subject that's "normally" covered by the time they reach high school, if we don't waste it pushing liberal political issues on elementary school kids.

you mean telling them liberal things like science exists?

what on earth are you talking about?

Liberals who try to bring issues on the national and state level and, in an attempt to find and introduce greater acceptance, indoctrinate the minds of young kids to their perception of the debate (such as transgender sexual orientation issues as one example). This is an example of how the left injects their political view topic into an elementary school, that children do not need to be involved in the middle of and exposed to. If you want to indoctrinate your political view of government and our nation to impressionable young minds, you are actually no different than religious conservatives that want to indoctrinate the need for discussing religion topics to bring a better sense of "morality" to our school children and our nation.. in short - Ideological political views and religion have no place in public schools.

you mean liberals are political?

duh....

because rightwwingnuts aren't? at least we don't pretend science doesn't exist and try to leave people stupid and uneducated so they vote for rightwingnuts

It is this view that I love most about liberals.

 

[BULLDOG]

Yes, Trump won. No he didn't deserve to win.

No he didn't and neither did Hillary. They are both bad choices.

Yet, she still got more votes. Trump was not, and is not the choice of the voters

He is of the ones that counted, isn't he?

He did win the electoral college. Unfortunately, that doesn't necessarily reflect the will of most voters.

Voters gave Trump a mandate actually....

That's just silly.