dude, I read up on the guy, you don't have to republish his credentials. I see you're one of those that if you didn't play the sport, you can't comment on the sport. hahahahahahahahhaha so unrealistic blunderball.
The dufus you cited HAS NO CREDENTIALS in climate science. He is one of the paid off liars for the fossil fuel industry.
He doesn't have to Isaac. he did the work. disprove his work. Come on now, let's see what you have!!!!!
BTW, that will mean you will need that experiment that shows 120 PPM of CO2 drives temperatures. Just saying
How about you try to explain "
the work" he supposedly did, OK little retard? You cited it so presumably you think you understand it. If you can do that, I will show how phony this dude's BS actually is.
Why, you don't believe it and challenge it, you prove it wrong!!
Let's see your experts data for 120 PPM of CO2 against temperature!!!
So, as I figured, you can't explain "
the work" you claimed he had done (in 2011) or what it means to the worldwide scientific consensus on the reality and dangers of AGW/CC. All of his stuff is bogus pseudo-science anyway, but if you can't even explain what he was saying in that article you cited, I'm not bothering to debunk it, you lying troll.