Please explain how what you're posting is science? I believe that the science is the business of observation vs models, not manipulating temperature readings off thermometers, so tell me how that is science?
Is that some kind of special 'retard' joke?
In the real world most of the sun's energy that strikes the Earth winds up in the oceans and that is how it has always been. As the Earth heats up due to the increased CO2 levels in the air, sometimes currents carry warmer waters down into the depths in one place and colder waters from the depths to the surface in another place, or vice versa, and this strongly affects surface air temperatures over the oceans, and thus world average surface temperatures. At this time some of these currents are driven by natural cycles, like the ENSO, PDO, and AMOC, but some research indicates that some changes in ocean currents happening now may be due to AGW driven changes in wind patterns and speeds.
In any case, this is how it has always been....
Wrong about what?
Wrong about what?
If the "deniers" are wrong about global warming being nothing more than a leftwing scam, then we're well down the road to self destruction and things are getting ready to break off--and there's nothing we can do.
So, you keep asking for data. This report has all the data that was available.
Berkley's data is all ADJUSTED every single data point. I will use other unadjusted temps for my work. There are papers out today which show that 90% Of all warming post 1900 is adjustments. Given how stable the earth has been and the USCRN recent input to the game showing the amount of bias, I am of the opinion that Berkley's stuff is crap.
IF you remove the 0.8 to 1.2 deg C that is pointed out by several groups of scientists as being alteration crap the current cycles are of no statistical significance.
There are papers out there that show that 90% of all warming post 1900 is alteration? So, my ignorant little buddy, why the hell did you not post a link to several of those papers? Come on now, you want any kind of credibility, post your links. Don't be shy, but if they are from the Daily Enquirer, we will only eviserate you. LOL.
We are responsible, we have to fix up our habits for example don't cut trees for example put our dead bodies under ground for example build our city in desert not in rein forest and more.......New scientific evidence, once again, exposes the delusional, ideologically motivated claims of the AGW deniers that the Earth is not still warming (or, even more crazy, "cooling") for the fraudulent nonsense that they are.
2014 on Track to be Hottest Year on Record
Climate Central
By Andrea Thompson
September 18th, 2014
(excerpts)
Just days after NASA data showed that August 2014 was the warmest August on record, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration confirmed the ranking and raised the ante: Thereās a good chance 2014 could become the warmest year on record.
Temperature departures around the world for the period from January-August 2014, which ranks as the 3rd warmest such period on record. Credit: NOAA
āIf we continue a consistent departure from average for the rest of 2014, we will edge out 2010 as the warmest year on record,ā said Jake Crouch, a climatologist with NOAAās National Climatic Data Center, during a press briefing Thursday. Specifically, if each of the remaining months of the year ranks among the top five warmest, 2014 will take the top spot, he said. The news may come as a surprise to those living in the eastern portion of the U.S., which has seen a relatively cool year so far, with a frigid winter followed by a near-average summer (which seemed extremely mild compared to recent steamy summers). But the global picture shows that the East was āpretty much the only land area in the globe that had cooler-than-average temperatures,ā Crouch said. (The western U.S., on the other hand, has been baking.)
For the year-to-date, the globe has measured 1.22Ā°F above the 20th century average of 57.3Ā°F, which makes January-August 2014 the third warmest such period since records began in 1880. The record-hot August marks the 38th consecutive August and the 354th consecutive month with a global average temperature above the 20th century average, according to the NCDC. Of the five warmest years on record (2010, 2005, 1998, 2013, and 2003, in that order), only 2013 and 2014 didnāt start with a mature El Nino, according to NOAA. Of the top 10 warmest years on record, 1998 is the only year that didnāt occur in the 21st century, showing how much global temperatures have risen due to the increase of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
The top 10 warmest years on record globally, according to NOAA data.
It is often reported that the temperature of the earth is higher the past 20 years than it has ever been in history. This is simply not true, nor has it ever been. Hundreds of research studies using ice cores, pollen sedimentation, tree rings, etc. have shown that there were dozens of periods in the past 11,000 years (the Holocene period) that earth's temperature was warmer than it is today. Earth's temperature was very much warmer at least four times during the current interglacial period.
Nope!!!
It is often reported that the temperature of the earth is higher the past 20 years than it has ever been in history. This is simply not true, nor has it ever been. Hundreds of research studies using ice cores, pollen sedimentation, tree rings, etc. have shown that there were dozens of periods in the past 11,000 years (the Holocene period) that earth's temperature was warmer than it is today. Earth's temperature was very much warmer at least four times during the current interglacial period.
Wrong. Denier cult myths based on cherry-picking the data.
In the real world, this is the scientific temperature record for the Holocene. The Earth's temperatures are currently at the upper tip of the red line on the far right side of the graph.
Blue curve: Global temperature reconstruction from proxy data of Marcott et al, Science 2013. Shown here is the RegEM version ā significant differences between the variants with different averaging methods arise only towards the end, where the number of proxy series decreases. This does not matter since the recent temperature evolution is well known from instrumental measurements, shown in red (global temperature from the instrumental HadCRU data). Graph: Klaus Bitterman.
(source: Dr. Stefan Rahmstorf at RealClimate)
To my science, no, to your psuedoscience Damn Yes. CAN YOU HEAR ME? It doesn't matter how many times you post your lies, I and others will continue to take a dump on it. Your links are mostly all lies. THAT AIN'T GOING TO CHANGE HERE, DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT?
