200 illegal acts that Trump has committed in 2025

[Doc7505]

List your imaginary claims.

<~~~~~~>

​

 

[Stann]

<~~~~~~>
View attachment 1189630​

Like I thought , all hot air , no proof.

 

[theHawk]

Tell that to the lawyer and legal expert on the video. I am sure you believe you know more ebout the law than he does. I am sure he will appreciate your
knowledge

Don’t give a shit what some random lawyer with TDS has to say.

I spent decades working for the military and I can tell you this about IGs: Inspector Generals are pretty worthless. All they do is submit their findings to the commander. So if the commander doesn’t trust them, what good are they?

Any actual laws being broke would need to be investigated by federal authorities and charged by them to have any real consequences. An IG is nothing more than an auditor who submits a report.

 

[22lcidw]

Tell that to the lawyer and legal expert on the video. I am sure you believe you know more ebout the law than he does. I am sure he will appreciate your
knowledge

One thing we have found out is that in important positions from the ruling class and the ilk surrounding them there is a lot of lying. A lot of it.

 

[MisterBeale]

Tell that to the lawyer and legal expert on the video.

If all this is true, why hasn't the president been impeached, thrown out of office, and locked up?

 

[Stann]

If all this is true, why hasn't the president been impeached, thrown out of office, and locked up?

Republicans.

 

[RedrickTheCoat]

Well #1 on your list is false. The President appoints and can fire Inspector Generals.

The fact that #1 on your list is 100% false merits not wasting any time on the rest of the list.

Read it again. Yes, the Presdient can remove inspector generals, but the SAME law also requires 30 days written notice to Congress with the reasons before removal.
In Spetember 2025, a Judge held that Trump unlawfully fired at least eight IGs by failing to provide the required 30-day notice and reasons, in violation of the Inspector General Act.

I would recommend watching the video rather than looking at the AI generated overview on the post.

If you prefer reading, I found a post with a transcript of the video in the comments:

Transcript Link

The transcript from the first item on the list is:
"We start with January 17th, 2025 because the corruption of his second term started just before he took office. On the eve of his presidency, instead of divesting himself of his conflict of interest ridden businesses, Trump launched World Liberty Financial and a bunch of valueless meme coins. This allowed him to take bribes, engage in secret deals, and further enrich himself, all outside of many of the ordinary financial regulations. In Trump's first term, lobbyists, foreign governments, and Republican organizations curried favor with Trump by spending money at his Washington DC hotel. But this time around, it's likely many individuals skipped the middleman and put money directly in Trump's pocket by buying the assets of World Liberty Financial and its various crypto offerings. Reports are that using World Liberty Financial, Trump has enriched himself by as much as $5 billion while in office. And it gets worse. We'll come back to that later."


Keep in mind, this video is an overview of all the things Trump has done. If he went in depth on each one the video would be hours long, but in some places he does have links to videos that explain that 'point' in more detail.

 

[MisterBeale]

Republicans.

If it is only b/c of "republicans," then clearly this guy is letting his partisan emotions get in the way of facts and reality.

 

[JGalt]

Below is a video where all 200 of the illegal acts that Trump has committed in 2025 are listed.



and here is Trump saying he believes in law and order



but here him saying he "doesn't know if he has to uphold the Constitution"



and here to back up the video's illegal acts list

AI Overview

As of December 1, 2025, there are several actions taken by the Trump administration that have been identified by legal experts, watchdogs, or federal judges as potentially or likely illegal, unconstitutional, or violations of federal law
.
It is important to note that the determination of "illegal" often depends on legal interpretation and the outcomes of ongoing court challenges.

Actions Identified as Potentially or Likely Illegal in 2025

• Unlawful Firings of Inspectors General: The firing of the Export-Import Bank Inspector General in October 2025 without providing written reasons to Congress 30 days prior likely violated federal law. A court also found similar violations in other inspector general dismissals in early 2025.
• Withholding Congressionally Appropriated Funds: The administration is accused of illegally withholding billions in funds for various programs. A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order in April 2025 to block the termination of certain public health funds.
• Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship: A January 2025 executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship for children of non-citizens was blocked by a federal judge who ruled it likely unconstitutional.
• Executive Orders Targeting Law Firms: March 2025 executive orders targeting specific law firms by revoking security clearances and terminating government contracts are facing legal challenges. A judge issued a temporary restraining order and noted the order "casts a chilling harm of blizzard proportion across the entire legal profession".
• Actions Targeting Universities and Student Protesters: Executive actions in Spring 2025 targeting universities and student protesters are facing lawsuits for violating the First Amendment, due process, and federal immigration law.
• Efforts to Undermine Elections: Efforts to rewrite election rules, target election officials, and impose strict voter requirements have been called an "illegal campaign" by advocacy groups. A federal court issued a preliminary injunction in April 2025 against the enforcement of a proof of citizenship requirement.
• Invocation of the Alien Enemies Act: The March 2025 invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to apprehend and remove Venezuelan citizens has been criticized for potential overreach and due process implications.

Status of Past Legal Cases in 2025

• New York Falsifying Business Records Case: Donald Trump was convicted in May 2024 and received an unconditional discharge in January 2025. He appealed the conviction in October 2025.
• Federal Cases (Election Obstruction and Documents): The federal cases in Florida and D.C. were dismissed in late 2024 and early 2025 due to a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and Department of Justice policy.
• Georgia Election Racketeering Case: All charges in the Georgia case were dropped in November 2025.

Trump is a conman, a liar, and someone that is in it for himself

You shitheads built the monster, now you're being destroyed by your own creation.

 

[Stryder50]

Tell that to the lawyer and legal expert on the video. I am sure you believe you know more ebout the law than he does. I am sure he will appreciate your
knowledge

How about a transcript/text.
I haven't 41 minutes to waste watching your pravda.

 

[Mac1958]

Of course you don't care. You belong to a cult.

I've noticed they're back to using the TDS deflection more and more. At some level, they know what they're seeing.

There has been no more ironic a term for them to use through this whole mess than "TDS".

TDS, indeed. No shit. Look in the mirror, Trumpsters.

 

[Stryder50]

Read it again. Yes, the Presdient can remove inspector generals, but the SAME law also requires 30 days written notice to Congress with the reasons before removal.
In Spetember 2025, a Judge held that Trump unlawfully fired at least eight IGs by failing to provide the required 30-day notice and reasons, in violation of the Inspector General Act.

I would recommend watching the video rather than looking at the AI generated overview on the post.

If you prefer reading, I found a post with a transcript of the video in the comments:

Transcript Link

The transcript from the first item on the list is:
"We start with January 17th, 2025 because the corruption of his second term started just before he took office. On the eve of his presidency, instead of divesting himself of his conflict of interest ridden businesses, Trump launched World Liberty Financial and a bunch of valueless meme coins. This allowed him to take bribes, engage in secret deals, and further enrich himself, all outside of many of the ordinary financial regulations. In Trump's first term, lobbyists, foreign governments, and Republican organizations curried favor with Trump by spending money at his Washington DC hotel. But this time around, it's likely many individuals skipped the middleman and put money directly in Trump's pocket by buying the assets of World Liberty Financial and its various crypto offerings. Reports are that using World Liberty Financial, Trump has enriched himself by as much as $5 billion while in office. And it gets worse. We'll come back to that later."


Keep in mind, this video is an overview of all the things Trump has done. If he went in depth on each one the video would be hours long, but in some places he does have links to videos that explain that 'point' in more detail.

Thanks for the transcript, but ...

The next paragraph after your excerpt above shows where this is going;

"So, starting things out on January 20th, Trump reported to eliminate birthright citizenship via executive order. This was a profound constitutional violation, particularly of the 14th amendment and due process."

The 14th Amendment is the only part of the Constitution dealing with "birthright citizenship".
It is 160+ years old and dated ...
Was written to deal with former slaves of the Confederacy States ...
Is vaguely worded and subject to loose interpretation ...
Comes from an era when there were no institutionalized documents of identification/citizenship ...
It's application to those born of illegal immigrants is result of a Court decree, which could be overturned by another court decree ...
Claiming such as a "profound constitutional violation" is a subjective stretch of opinion !

It becomes clear from here on that we are into murky waters of subjective opinions

 

[Luckyone]

If all this is true, why hasn't the president been impeached, thrown out of office, and locked up?

The only thing that can be done to a president is to impeach him and with the Republicans controlling Congress, that is not going to happen

 

[Luckyone]

Don’t give a shit what some random lawyer with TDS has to say.

I spent decades working for the military and I can tell you this about IGs: Inspector Generals are pretty worthless. All they do is submit their findings to the commander. So if the commander doesn’t trust them, what good are they?

Any actual laws being broke would need to be investigated by federal authorities and charged by them to have any real consequences. An IG is nothing more than an auditor who submits a report.

Your OPINION is worthless. AI states that the president does not have the power to fire inspector Generals without due cause

 

[theHawk]

Read it again. Yes, the Presdient can remove inspector generals, but the SAME law also requires 30 days written notice to Congress with the reasons before removal.
In Spetember 2025, a Judge held that Trump unlawfully fired at least eight IGs by failing to provide the required 30-day notice and reasons, in violation of the Inspector General Act.

I would recommend watching the video rather than looking at the AI generated overview on the post.

If you prefer reading, I found a post with a transcript of the video in the comments:

Transcript Link

The transcript from the first item on the list is:
"We start with January 17th, 2025 because the corruption of his second term started just before he took office. On the eve of his presidency, instead of divesting himself of his conflict of interest ridden businesses, Trump launched World Liberty Financial and a bunch of valueless meme coins. This allowed him to take bribes, engage in secret deals, and further enrich himself, all outside of many of the ordinary financial regulations. In Trump's first term, lobbyists, foreign governments, and Republican organizations curried favor with Trump by spending money at his Washington DC hotel. But this time around, it's likely many individuals skipped the middleman and put money directly in Trump's pocket by buying the assets of World Liberty Financial and its various crypto offerings. Reports are that using World Liberty Financial, Trump has enriched himself by as much as $5 billion while in office. And it gets worse. We'll come back to that later."


Keep in mind, this video is an overview of all the things Trump has done. If he went in depth on each one the video would be hours long, but in some places he does have links to videos that explain that 'point' in more detail.

President Trump’s firing of them is the 30 day notice. You think they are going to be used for anything when they have already been told to pack their bags? Nope.

 

[theHawk]

Your OPINION is worthless. AI states that the president does not have the power to fire inspector Generals without due cause

LOL “AI”.

Cool story. Did that same judge reinstate those IGs?

Nope. So they are fired. President Trump won.

Good luck with you AI answer. LOL

 

[Luckyone]

LOL “AI”.

Cool story. Did that same judge reinstate those IGs?

Nope. So they are fired. President Trump won.

Good luck with you AI answer. LOL

Here is your LEGAL answer to the question. From Congress.com:

Removal Procedure

The removal procedure for presidentially appointed IGs is found in Title 5, Section 403(b), which reads in part

An Inspector General may be removed from office by the President. If an Inspector General is removed from office or is transferred to another position or location within an establishment, the President shall communicate in writing the substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons for any such removal or transfer to both Houses of Congress (including the appropriate congressional committees), not later than 30 days before the removal or transfer. Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit a personnel action otherwise authorized by law, other than transfer or removal.

For IGs appointed by agency heads under Title 5, Section 415, the same notice rule applies, except that the head of the agency, rather than President, appoints and removes the IG.

The 30-day notice requirement was established under the Inspector General Reform Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-409), and the requirement that notice include a "substantive rationale" was added by the Securing Inspector General Independence Act of 2022 (Title LII, Subtitle A, of P.L. 117-263).

Further, in most cases, the President must provide Congress with written notice 15 days before placing an IG on non-duty status and cannot do so at all during the 30-day notice period before removal of an IG without a specific finding that the IG poses a potential threat to employees or the interest of the government.

Now, the question is "did Trump follow the legal guidelines"? the answer is mostly "no"

AI Overview



During his time in office, particularly in 2020 and early 2025, President Trump did not consistently follow the established guidelines for removing inspectors general (IGs), leading to significant controversy and accusations of breaking the law and historic norms
.
Federal law, specifically the Inspector General Act as amended by the Securing Inspector General Independence Act of 2022, requires the President to provide a written communication to both houses of Congress with a substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons, at least 30 days before the removal or transfer of a presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed IG.
In his removals, critics in Congress and legal experts argued that Trump failed to provide the necessary 30-day notice and substantive, case-specific explanations, often citing a simple "lack of confidence" or "changing priorities" instead. This was widely viewed as insufficient to fulfill the requirements of the statute, which were put in place to ensure IGs are not removed for political reasons.
Key issues included:

• Insufficient Rationale: The administration's explanations were generally considered vague and not detailed enough to meet the legal standard.
• Lack of Notice: In some cases, IGs were effectively removed immediately by being placed on administrative leave during the 30-day notice period, a move that critics argued violated the spirit and intent of the law.
• Breaking Norms: The mass firings of IGs, which included those appointed by previous administrations and his own, broke historical norms where IGs typically served across administrations due to their non-partisan, independent oversight role.

 

[Hollie]

Below is a video where all 200 of the illegal acts that Trump has committed in 2025 are listed.



and here is Trump saying he believes in law and order



but here him saying he "doesn't know if he has to uphold the Constitution"



and here to back up the video's illegal acts list

AI Overview

As of December 1, 2025, there are several actions taken by the Trump administration that have been identified by legal experts, watchdogs, or federal judges as potentially or likely illegal, unconstitutional, or violations of federal law
.
It is important to note that the determination of "illegal" often depends on legal interpretation and the outcomes of ongoing court challenges.

Actions Identified as Potentially or Likely Illegal in 2025

• Unlawful Firings of Inspectors General: The firing of the Export-Import Bank Inspector General in October 2025 without providing written reasons to Congress 30 days prior likely violated federal law. A court also found similar violations in other inspector general dismissals in early 2025.
• Withholding Congressionally Appropriated Funds: The administration is accused of illegally withholding billions in funds for various programs. A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order in April 2025 to block the termination of certain public health funds.
• Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship: A January 2025 executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship for children of non-citizens was blocked by a federal judge who ruled it likely unconstitutional.
• Executive Orders Targeting Law Firms: March 2025 executive orders targeting specific law firms by revoking security clearances and terminating government contracts are facing legal challenges. A judge issued a temporary restraining order and noted the order "casts a chilling harm of blizzard proportion across the entire legal profession".
• Actions Targeting Universities and Student Protesters: Executive actions in Spring 2025 targeting universities and student protesters are facing lawsuits for violating the First Amendment, due process, and federal immigration law.
• Efforts to Undermine Elections: Efforts to rewrite election rules, target election officials, and impose strict voter requirements have been called an "illegal campaign" by advocacy groups. A federal court issued a preliminary injunction in April 2025 against the enforcement of a proof of citizenship requirement.
• Invocation of the Alien Enemies Act: The March 2025 invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to apprehend and remove Venezuelan citizens has been criticized for potential overreach and due process implications.

Status of Past Legal Cases in 2025

• New York Falsifying Business Records Case: Donald Trump was convicted in May 2024 and received an unconditional discharge in January 2025. He appealed the conviction in October 2025.
• Federal Cases (Election Obstruction and Documents): The federal cases in Florida and D.C. were dismissed in late 2024 and early 2025 due to a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and Department of Justice policy.
• Georgia Election Racketeering Case: All charges in the Georgia case were dropped in November 2025.

Trump is a conman, a liar, and someone that is in it for himself

What a total fraud. Preceding your list of grievances was the statement, “Actions Identified as Potentially or Likely Illegal in 2025”

So yeah, that long, tedious cut and paste was not just potentially or likely just a fraud, but a concerted effort at fraud.

 

[Luckyone]

President Trump’s firing of them is the 30 day notice. You think they are going to be used for anything when they have already been told to pack their bags? Nope.

You are looking everywhere (and finding nothing) to support your biased theory, aren't you?

The word you are ignoring is "ADVANCE-TO-THE-FIRING" notice. That is BEFORE they are fired!!!!!!!!!!

There is absolutely no "Hawk" in you. You are more like an "Emu", who is considered the dumbest bird in the world. Why don't you change your nick and be honest (rather than deceitful) about who you are. A dumb person that is biased to boot!

 

[Stann]

Your OPINION is worthless. AI states that the president does not have the power to fire inspector Generals without due cause

T is of value to him and the others who continue to believe the lies. Yes , worthless.