Spiderman
Senior Member
- Oct 2, 2013
- 2,039
- 55
- 48
Thank you for the reasonable response. I agree with your assessment that guns could and should be used for self defense, I'm concerned about the collateral damage, especially when they are used for aggression. It is a shame to have innocent people killed because a nut got a hold of a weapon.
The second point was, who decides what types of weapons are covered under the 2nd amendment? I have not read anywhere that there are parameters of choice or quantity of weapon.
Not sure how you concluded that I have chosen to be defenseless? These discussions should not be an all or nothing proposition, either 50 automatic, high caliber weapons or nothing.
Hopefully we are all on the same page about innocent people being killed, the question is what becomes a good solution to address it.
innocent people aren't being killed by law abiding gun owners.
80% of gun murders happen in urban areas and are gang related.
It is not a gun problem as if you excluded gun crimes related to gangs our gun death rate would be far far lower.
If you want to stop gun violence then start with the major urban areas where most of the violence takes place not with law abiding gun owners.
Deadliest U.S. mass shootings - Timelines - Los Angeles Times
All of these places seem to be in small towns...
Despite the popular conception mass shootings are very rare. In fact mass shootings account for less than 1% of all gun deaths
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/09/17/mass-shootings-rivet-national-attention-but-are-a-small-share-of-gun-violence/
Focusing on the exception is not going to solve the problem of gun violence.
Last edited: