1st CRT, Now Democrats Want To Teach 'Pornography Literacy' To Children?!

[DukeU]

It is not the government's/school job to teach children about life, that is the parent's job.

The school's job is to teach Math, English, etc.

It's no surprise they are failing at both.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Leftists sure do like to sexualize children.

We should all send our kids to private schools. Oh wait. this is a private school.

That isn't the issue. The issue is teaching masturbation to children. What's your opinion?

They'll figure it out on their own.

The question begs why do adults want to get involved?

 

[sealybobo]

NY Times blasted for defending 'pornography literacy' for first graders: 'These people are sick'

Concerned parents and media critics swatted the New York Times on Thursday after the newspaper heralded Justine Ang Fonte, a New York teacher who recently became infamous for her sexual education curriculum for children and young adults, as a "sex-positive educator," and called her lessons...

www.foxnews.com

WTF?!

These people ARE sick!

Omg this is like the 4th story republicans have posted bashing liberals but no realizing that every one of these stories is about a private school. Th Dalton school? It’s private stupid. Do you want to regulate private schools?

I thought you republicans love private schools. This is four negative stories in 2 days about private schools.

Who gives a shit if this is a private school or not. Liberal extremists wanting to show porn to your 6yo should not even be an idea to consider for even a mili-second. For the NY Times to defend such an idea is ludicrous, and they should be HAMMERED for doing so.

It's a private company. What do you want to do to this private company? Regulate it? Interesting.

Yes it should matter if it's a public or private school. This to me sounds like an argument against private schools. Only you fuckers don't mention it's a private school. You want everyone to assume it's a public school.

Let the market decide. Isn't that what you guys always say? If the parents don't like it they can take their kids out of that school and send them to public school. But keep in mind my public school teacher taught us how to put a condom on too. Because a lot of our stupid parents weren't comfortable talking birds and bees with their kids and too many of our young teens are becoming parents. Wear a fucking condom is a good message. Suck a dick instead of putting it in your pussy is wise advice.

 

[badger2]

Remember, the sewage slime now in the White House and his sleep-up are moving (genuflectors [italics]) across the border. You have to ask why we’ve used italics?

 

[sealybobo]

It is not the government's/school job to teach children about life, that is the parent's job.

The school's job is to teach Math, English, etc.

It's no surprise they are failing at both.

Nonsense. We have so many shitty parents out there. Sending our kids to school is a solution to that problem. The school will teach them things our dumb ass parents can't or won't. You don't like sex ed? When did you turn into an old fart?

 

[sealybobo]

NY Times blasted for defending 'pornography literacy' for first graders: 'These people are sick'

Concerned parents and media critics swatted the New York Times on Thursday after the newspaper heralded Justine Ang Fonte, a New York teacher who recently became infamous for her sexual education curriculum for children and young adults, as a "sex-positive educator," and called her lessons...

www.foxnews.com

WTF?!

These people ARE sick!

Why are you blaming Democrats and not Private Schools? Your thread should be that PRIVATE SCHOOLS want to teach pornography.

 

[DukeU]

Nonsense. We have so many shitty parents out there. Sending our kids to school is a solution to that problem. The school will teach them things our dumb ass parents can't or won't. You don't like sex ed? When did you turn into an old fart?

Not their job (or yours) to decide things for parents........ But, you don't get much shittier than teaching elementary aged kids about things such as sex and pornography.

 

[sealybobo]

Nonsense. We have so many shitty parents out there. Sending our kids to school is a solution to that problem. The school will teach them things our dumb ass parents can't or won't. You don't like sex ed? When did you turn into an old fart?

Not their job (or yours) to decide things for parents........ But, you don't get much shittier than teaching elementary aged kids about things such as sex and pornography.

You can only do one thing. Take your kid out of that private school and hope the next one doesn't pull this shit on your little virgins.

 

[badger2]

NY Times blasted for defending 'pornography literacy' for first graders: 'These people are sick'

Concerned parents and media critics swatted the New York Times on Thursday after the newspaper heralded Justine Ang Fonte, a New York teacher who recently became infamous for her sexual education curriculum for children and young adults, as a "sex-positive educator," and called her lessons...

www.foxnews.com

WTF?!

These people ARE sick!

Omg this is like the 4th story republicans have posted bashing liberals but no realizing that every one of these stories is about a private school. Th Dalton school? It’s private stupid. Do you want to regulate private schools?

I thought you republicans love private schools. This is four negative stories in 2 days about private schools.

Who gives a shit if this is a private school or not. Liberal extremists wanting to show porn to your 6yo should not even be an idea to consider for even a mili-second. For the NY Times to defend such an idea is ludicrous, and they should be HAMMERED for doing so.

It's a private company. What do you want to do to this private company? Regulate it? Interesting.

Yes it should matter if it's a public or private school. This to me sounds like an argument against private schools. Only you fuckers don't mention it's a private school. You want everyone to assume it's a public school.

Let the market decide. Isn't that what you guys always say? If the parents don't like it they can take their kids out of that school and send them to public school. But keep in mind my public school teacher taught us how to put a condom on too. Because a lot of our stupid parents weren't comfortable talking birds and bees with their kids and too many of our young teens are becoming parents. Wear a fucking condom is a good message. Suck a dick instead of putting it in your pussy is wise advice.

Public box or private box, the organisms produced are going out into the environment, and like genuflectors, one cannot vet them for pathologies, those you rub elbows with, an anonymous distance from death, like a drunk passing a coked-out futures dealer on a Manhattan sidewalk.

 

[sealybobo]

NY Times blasted for defending 'pornography literacy' for first graders: 'These people are sick'

Concerned parents and media critics swatted the New York Times on Thursday after the newspaper heralded Justine Ang Fonte, a New York teacher who recently became infamous for her sexual education curriculum for children and young adults, as a "sex-positive educator," and called her lessons...

www.foxnews.com

WTF?!

These people ARE sick!

Omg this is like the 4th story republicans have posted bashing liberals but no realizing that every one of these stories is about a private school. Th Dalton school? It’s private stupid. Do you want to regulate private schools?

I thought you republicans love private schools. This is four negative stories in 2 days about private schools.

Who gives a shit if this is a private school or not. Liberal extremists wanting to show porn to your 6yo should not even be an idea to consider for even a mili-second. For the NY Times to defend such an idea is ludicrous, and they should be HAMMERED for doing so.

It's a private company. What do you want to do to this private company? Regulate it? Interesting.

Yes it should matter if it's a public or private school. This to me sounds like an argument against private schools. Only you fuckers don't mention it's a private school. You want everyone to assume it's a public school.

Let the market decide. Isn't that what you guys always say? If the parents don't like it they can take their kids out of that school and send them to public school. But keep in mind my public school teacher taught us how to put a condom on too. Because a lot of our stupid parents weren't comfortable talking birds and bees with their kids and too many of our young teens are becoming parents. Wear a fucking condom is a good message. Suck a dick instead of putting it in your pussy is wise advice.

Public box or private box, the organisms produced are going out into the environment, and like genuflectors, one cannot vet them for pathologies, those you rub elbows with, an anonymous distance from death, like a drunk passing a coked-out futures dealer on a Manhattan sidewalk.

Sounds like bad black poetry. Snapping fingers instead of clapping.

 

[DukeU]

You can only do one thing. Take your kid out of that private school and hope the next one doesn't pull this shit on your little virgins.

^^^^^^^^^

And many wonder why our schools are failing.

 

[easyt65]

.

It's a private company. What do you want to do to this private company? Regulate it? Interesting.

How about the media rebuke the school for even considering allowing this instead of defending it?! The fact that the NY Times did defend them shows how perverted, disgusting, how low their morals, ethics, etc... are.

Again, if you even hesitate a second before hammering the shit out of anyone who suggests showing porn to a 6yo there is something wrong with you.

I have no doubt the parents will begin pulling their kids out of this school and the backlash will force them to do away with this plan / course.

'REGULATING THIS'? IT IS ALREADY REGULATED!

SHOWING PORN TO MINORS IS ILLEGAL!

'It is a violation of federal law to distribute or expose obscene materials to minors. The individual is a minor when under the age of sixteen for federal laws. The material may include any physical or digital copy to include the use of the internet. The perpetrator may suffer various penalties under federal law when violating obscenity laws.'

'The illegal act of exposing a minor to obscene images occurs through the visual representation of any depiction such as drawings, photos, images in video, and even cartoons and paintings. These images must show the minor some form of sexual activity in action. Other types of obscenities are also illegal such as video and photo pornography. The more exposure to these graphic depictions, the greater the consequences for the perpetrator. For someone under sixteen that has never seen such imagery, it could affect his or her outlook on sexual relations and what is appropriate to the morals and ethics of current society.'

'There exist sections of the federal laws and groups that fight obscenity incidents. When the organization discovers an issue with a minor exposed to these graphic images or involvement of possible child pornography, legal action is often swift. There is generally a cooperation with the investigation in the department that initially handles the matter and the Federal Bureau of Investigations. This may lead to federal prosecution of the involved federal obscenity laws against the culprit. Pressing the importance of the connection between the exposure and impact or injury to the minor, the investigation and agents may seek the maximum penalties possible.'



The teacher should be arrested as well as the Principal who allowed this to happen. The NY Times - and anyone else who defends this - should be harshly rebuked.

Articles Written by Expert Witnesses - HGExperts.com

Find hundreds of articles published by expert witnesses specialized in general and medical fields. HGExperts.com helps you find an expert witness.

www.hgexperts.com

 

[easyt65]

Why are you blaming Democrats and not Private Schools? Your thread should be that PRIVATE SCHOOLS want to teach pornography.

I am rebuking the extremely liberal NY Times for defending this ILLEGAL practice of showing porn to minors.

 

[MisterBeale]

Nonsense. We have so many shitty parents out there. Sending our kids to school is a solution to that problem.

I actually agree with you.

We have a lot of upper middle class, and upper class parents that have no time to do their job correctly. And?

. . . a lot of them do not have the same morality of the SJW, liberal elite Universities where this type of thinking and these teachers are made, this controversy is good, and has exposed this, the publicity is all that is needed, now those who do not wish these morals pushed on their kids can find a different private school.

. . . or? Alternatively, this type of education will no longer be profitable, so it will be discontinued, this teacher, and these types of teachers will be booted, but I agree with you, this is not a job for government, it is a job for the free press to expose, and for market forces to determine what will be taught and what will not.

 

[sealybobo]

You can only do one thing. Take your kid out of that private school and hope the next one doesn't pull this shit on your little virgins.

^^^^^^^^^

And many wonder why our schools are failing.

Are private schools failing?

 

[hadit]

NY Times blasted for defending 'pornography literacy' for first graders: 'These people are sick'

Concerned parents and media critics swatted the New York Times on Thursday after the newspaper heralded Justine Ang Fonte, a New York teacher who recently became infamous for her sexual education curriculum for children and young adults, as a "sex-positive educator," and called her lessons...

www.foxnews.com

WTF?!

These people ARE sick!

Omg this is like the 4th story republicans have posted bashing liberals but no realizing that every one of these stories is about a private school. Th Dalton school? It’s private stupid. Do you want to regulate private schools?

I thought you republicans love private schools. This is four negative stories in 2 days about private schools.

Obviously, they are not afraid to criticize what needs to be criticized, regardless of where it's coming from. That's something you democrats could learn from.

 

[MisterBeale]

Why are you blaming Democrats and not Private Schools? Your thread should be that PRIVATE SCHOOLS want to teach pornography.

I am rebuking the extremely liberal NY Times for defending this ILLEGAL practice of showing porn to minors.

The NYT covered up and defended The Holodomor.

Only an idiot reads or takes the national propaganda register seriously. They are the center of all that is wrong with propaganda in the nation and have promoted all of our wars, probably been complicit in all the nation's war crimes. . . of course, of course.

Water is wet, the sky is blue.

The NYT is the worst, we all know.

The NYT has immunity, you ought to know this by now.

 

[sealybobo]

You can only do one thing. Take your kid out of that private school and hope the next one doesn't pull this shit on your little virgins.

^^^^^^^^^

And many wonder why our schools are failing.

And for the record, they didn't fail me. I graduated from college and got a great job and I'm financially doing great. Isn't that why we go to school? To get a better job than we would otherwise get? The system worked for me. Not sure why your kids are struggling. Maybe because they are having babies before they are financially stable. Maybe your kids teachers should have shown them how to put a fucking condom on. I didn't have an "accident" before I had a college degree. So don't blame the schools. Blame the parents. Don't even blame the kids. Blame THE PARENTS! They failed. YOU Failed.

 

[DukeU]

Are private schools failing?

Some are some aren't, but it looks like more are headed in that direction.

 

[hadit]

You can only do one thing. Take your kid out of that private school and hope the next one doesn't pull this shit on your little virgins.

^^^^^^^^^

And many wonder why our schools are failing.

Are private schools failing?

No. There is a battle being fought right now over what to teach our children and from what they should be protected. Parents have finally reached the point where they are willing to push back against agendas with which they do not agree. Educational choice is a good thing, because parents have options, and those who oppose private schools oppose choice.