1st CRT, Now Democrats Want To Teach 'Pornography Literacy' To Children?!

[Leo123]

Can you prove that or is it just wishful thinking on your part?

She never proves anything, she comes on here spouting her Marxist bullshit, gets called on it and shrinks back into her shell.

 

[sealybobo]

Can you prove that or is it just wishful thinking on your part?

You asked for it​

Sexual abuse of students at private schools is far more common than most people realize. The epidemic of private school sexual abuse is possible only due to the culture of secrecy and reputation climbing of the schools.

The public overlooks the problem for many reasons, but one of the most significant reasons is a culture of secrecy at these schools. Elite private schools worry their reputations will be damaged if it comes out that a teacher or staff member has been preying on students, so they do their best to keep the details secret. The law doesn’t require private academies meet the same degree of transparency as public schools, so concealing private school sexual abuse and sexual assault can seem a workable strategy.

How Secrecy Allows Private Schools To Cover Up Abuse

This culture of secrecy creates an environment that leads to sexual abuse. Private schools need to be held accountable, call (913) 400-2033.

drzlawfirm.com

We can't prove it because they, unlike public schools, can conceal the sexual abuse they do to minors.

The law doesn't require private schools to be as transparent as public schools.

Elite schools covered up sex abuse to protect their reputations, top cop believes as task force probes 7,000 cases

 

[sealybobo]

Assuming kids are mean is shameful in the first place. That's like assuming whites are all racist and need to be 'taught' not to be. Your insane comment about Christian kids being evil shows your bigotry.

You're just being stupid now. If you don't know that kids are naturally mean by nature, I don't know what to tell you. You're making me want to go find evidence for you but I'm leaving in 10 minutes and I can tell you are being obtuse.

 

[sealybobo]

She never proves anything, she comes on here spouting her Marxist bullshit, gets called on it and shrinks back into her shell.

Prove it! I just did. Now what?

 

[Resnic]

What kind of sick fuck thinks this is positive?

Jesus if this was 50 years ago she these people would have had their bodies found in a dumpster and no one would have seen a thing.

 

[Leo123]

You asked for it​

Sexual abuse of students at private schools is far more common than most people realize. The epidemic of private school sexual abuse is possible only due to the culture of secrecy and reputation climbing of the schools.

The public overlooks the problem for many reasons, but one of the most significant reasons is a culture of secrecy at these schools. Elite private schools worry their reputations will be damaged if it comes out that a teacher or staff member has been preying on students, so they do their best to keep the details secret. The law doesn’t require private academies meet the same degree of transparency as public schools, so concealing private school sexual abuse and sexual assault can seem a workable strategy.

How Secrecy Allows Private Schools To Cover Up Abuse

This culture of secrecy creates an environment that leads to sexual abuse. Private schools need to be held accountable, call (913) 400-2033.

drzlawfirm.com

We can't prove it because they, unlike public schools, can conceal the sexual abuse they do to minors.

The law doesn't require private schools to be as transparent as public schools.

Elite schools covered up sex abuse to protect their reputations, top cop believes as task force probes 7,000 cases

Ha! Ha! that link is to a lawyer site that is angling for work!!! It bases it's 'facts' on a NYT article purporting to show there is lots of sexual abuse in private schools. What a joke!!

 

[daveman]

I am not and have never been a "marxist". I've been a card-carrying capitalist all of my life, and I've spent my entire professional life working for banks, insurance companies and lawyers.

Democrats aren't running around calling everyone "pedophiles" - so much so that real pedophiles are getting away. Republicans are reporting anyone they don't like as a pedophile. So while the police are chasing Republican rumours about their political foes, real pedophiles are being ignored.

They sure are being ignored. Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of child sex trafficking -- but none of her customers have been.

I'd like to see her client list and all on it investigated and convicted.

You can't say that. You want the Democrats left alone.

 

[Leo123]

You're just being stupid now. If you don't know that kids are naturally mean by nature, I don't know what to tell you. You're making me want to go find evidence for you but I'm leaving in 10 minutes and I can tell you are being obtuse.

So, you can't tell me anything if I disagree with your opinion and now you have to go........good riddance.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Not what I'm seeing. In fact, every time you right wingers post a fucked up story about a school, I click on the link to see the details and every time it's a private school you are talking about. Teaching CRT, molesting kids, etc.....

It's probably because private schools have to lower their standards for who can work at their school. Teachers don't get paid as much so of course you get the bottom of the barrel. Just like inner city public schools.

Most private schools are farther along than most public schools. You must be reading some radical lib rags.

 

[hadit]

You asked for it​

Sexual abuse of students at private schools is far more common than most people realize. The epidemic of private school sexual abuse is possible only due to the culture of secrecy and reputation climbing of the schools.

The public overlooks the problem for many reasons, but one of the most significant reasons is a culture of secrecy at these schools. Elite private schools worry their reputations will be damaged if it comes out that a teacher or staff member has been preying on students, so they do their best to keep the details secret. The law doesn’t require private academies meet the same degree of transparency as public schools, so concealing private school sexual abuse and sexual assault can seem a workable strategy.

How Secrecy Allows Private Schools To Cover Up Abuse

This culture of secrecy creates an environment that leads to sexual abuse. Private schools need to be held accountable, call (913) 400-2033.

drzlawfirm.com

We can't prove it because they, unlike public schools, can conceal the sexual abuse they do to minors.

The law doesn't require private schools to be as transparent as public schools.

Elite schools covered up sex abuse to protect their reputations, top cop believes as task force probes 7,000 cases

Key phrase, "We can't prove it".

 

[sealybobo]

Ha! Ha! that link is to a lawyer site that is angling for work!!! It bases it's 'facts' on a NYT article purporting to show there is lots of sexual abuse in private schools. What a joke!!

The fact is, private schools can and do cover up pedophilia that happens in their schools and the reason they do it is clear as the lying nose on your ugly face. Do you think parents will send their kids to a school that hires pedophiles? They don't want the bad rep.

Public schools don't care. If you live in the neighborhood, that's the school you go to. If you don't like the school go to a private school or move to a different district.

So we all know why private schools cover up their pedos. Public schools can't. They have to be transparent.

The other point I made was that whenever you guys post crazy shit happening in schools, almost every time when I click the link, it's a story that happened in a GOD DAMNED PRIVATE SCHOOL! I think that's important seeing as how you are using those stories to trash public schools.

 

[sealybobo]

Key phrase, "We can't prove it".

I'm noticing a theme here from right wingers. Prove it. Private schools cover up pedophilia, we all know it's true but you say "prove it?"

We all know Trump is responsible for the insurrection, Republicans now say, "prove it".

Yea, with the Supreme Court stacked and Republicans willing to take every argument all the way to the Supreme Court, it could cost a lot of money to "prove it".

 

[sealybobo]

Assuming kids are mean is shameful in the first place. That's like assuming whites are all racist and need to be 'taught' not to be. Your insane comment about Christian kids being evil shows your bigotry.

I don't assume anything stupid.

Most parents, sooner or later, go through this upsetting and challenging experience: you learn that your child did something unkind, mean or even cruel.

When my sons were small, still in the single-digit ages, a friend told me that he had seen the older one “terrorize” the younger one. You know how it goes: the older boy threatens the younger one something like this—“if you don’t give me that toy, I’ll hit you.”

Sadly, this kind of behavior can sometimes seem common and even universal in children. Threatening physical pain or harm; forcing smaller children to do the bidding of older, larger ones; doing something mean to get your way or gain some advantage—all of these bullying patterns of behavior challenge parents to stop the meanness and turn the child’s actions toward kindness instead.

Children: Naturally Mean, or Naturally Kind?

Most parents, sooner or later, go through this upsetting and challenging experience: you learn that your child did something unkind, mean or even cruel.

bahaiteachings.org

You must not know kids. Even if you have kids, you're one of those parents who says "not my boys"

You don't know them. You should see how they act when you aren't around.

 

[hadit]

I'm noticing a theme here from right wingers. Prove it. Private schools cover up pedophilia, we all know it's true but you say "prove it?"

We all know Trump is responsible for the insurrection, Republicans now say, "prove it".

Yea, with the Supreme Court stacked and Republicans willing to take every argument all the way to the Supreme Court, it could cost a lot of money to "prove it".

And the reason we insist on proof is the ease with which lies are started and propagated. Simply finding a blog post or article written by some internet keyboard jockey isn't proof of anything, because there are no consequences for being wrong. "Journalists" don't normally print retractions or admit when they're wrong, they either double down or just ignore what they said and move on to the next story, leaving the damage done in their wake. They don't get fired, they get awards. This is especially true in the months leading up to an election, because the goal is to have the story effect the election, then worry about truth and facts after. So yeah, prove it, or at least say it's something that could happen and we think it might be happening, but don't try to make fact out of opinion.

 

[sealybobo]

Assuming kids are mean is shameful in the first place. That's like assuming whites are all racist and need to be 'taught' not to be. Your insane comment about Christian kids being evil shows your bigotry.

They also raise a fundamental psychological and spiritual issue: are children naturally mean, or naturally kind? Does humanity have an innately evil disposition?

Kids, as we all know, can be amazingly sweet and thoughtful. We’ve all seen children who behave in ways that exemplify kindness. On the other hand, cruelty and meanness do sometimes seem natural to children.

I love it that you either don't know this or you are playing stupid. Yes, I've seen many young christian children bully people in the classroom. And they grow up to be assholes like you who bully gays online.

Children: Naturally Mean, or Naturally Kind?

Most parents, sooner or later, go through this upsetting and challenging experience: you learn that your child did something unkind, mean or even cruel.

bahaiteachings.org

 

[sealybobo]

And the reason we insist on proof is the ease with which lies are started and propagated. Simply finding a blog post or article written by some internet keyboard jockey isn't proof of anything, because there are no consequences for being wrong. "Journalists" don't normally print retractions or admit when they're wrong, they either double down or just ignore what they said and move on to the next story, leaving the damage done in their wake. They don't get fired, they get awards. This is especially true in the months leading up to an election, because the goal is to have the story effect the election, then worry about truth and facts after. So yeah, prove it, or at least say it's something that could happen and we think it might be happening, but don't try to make fact out of opinion.

You won't accept or care about any proof so go shove your proof up your ass.

Prove Journalist don't normally print retractions
Prove it's easy to propagate a lie
Prove journalist don't mind printing retractions
Prove they double down
Prove they ignore
Prove they just move on to the next story
Prove they don't get fired
Prove they get awards after lying
Prove it's true expecially leading up to the election.
Prove their goal is to have the story affect the election

I won't give a fuck if you prove any of these things by the way. So don't waste your time. Just like I won't waste mine. Prove you're not a fucking idiot liar.

 

[sealybobo]

I said Marxist tool....Using all the tactics laid out in the tome: 'Rules for Radicals' you hear from left wing media with little knowledge of what you are spreading but you 'just know' you're correct. This is evidenced by your latest outlandish statement claiming that Republicans are somehow falsely labeling Democrats as pedophiles. You see, you are applying the Marxist doctrine of blaming others for what you yourself are doing. I don't know how I can make it any clearer to you than that.

Here is a great example of how she is correct Republicans are falsely labeling Democrats as pedophiles.

In a tweet, DeSantis's press secretary, Christina Pushaw, claimed that anyone who opposes the Parental Rights in Education bill was "probably a groomer." Grooming generally refers to when someone manipulates a person -- typically a child or teen -- in order to commit a sexual offense

I'm opposed to it. So does that make me a groomer? Then she falsely labeled me as pedophiles.

 

[sealybobo]

I said Marxist tool....Using all the tactics laid out in the tome: 'Rules for Radicals' you hear from left wing media with little knowledge of what you are spreading but you 'just know' you're correct. This is evidenced by your latest outlandish statement claiming that Republicans are somehow falsely labeling Democrats as pedophiles. You see, you are applying the Marxist doctrine of blaming others for what you yourself are doing. I don't know how I can make it any clearer to you than that.

More than 6 in 10 Americans oppose legislation like the Florida bill that would prohibit classroom lessons about sexual orientation or gender identity in elementary school, according to a March ABC News/Ipsos poll.

So 6 in 10 Americans are pedophiles???

Then Republicans are falsely labeling us Democrats as Pedophiles.

 

[hadit]

You won't accept or care about any proof so go shove your proof up your ass.

Prove Journalist don't normally print retractions
Prove it's easy to propagate a lie
Prove journalist don't mind printing retractions
Prove they double down
Prove they ignore
Prove they just move on to the next story
Prove they don't get fired
Prove they get awards after lying
Prove it's true expecially leading up to the election.
Prove their goal is to have the story affect the election

I won't give a fuck if you prove any of these things by the way. So don't waste your time. Just like I won't waste mine. Prove you're not a fucking idiot liar.

Then you're back to blasting your opinion, finding an opinion piece that supports that opinion, and claiming it all as fact. Classic internet keyboard jockey stuff.

 

[sealybobo]

Then you're back to blasting your opinion, finding an opinion piece that supports that opinion, and claiming it all as fact. Classic internet keyboard jockey stuff.

Prove it.