1913 Is 1776 For Liberals

[
No, it gives ONE central bank control over the money supply.

It's totally communistic.

I think you need to review your history. Initially the power of the Federal Reserve system was predominantly in the regional banks who had locally elected boards. The Board of Governors had very little power. This resulted in the bad performance of the Fed 1928--1934.
It's you who needs to review your history...The "regional" Fed banks were and are mere window dressing.
 
Well no.

1776 was a LIBERAL revolution against a CONSERVATIVE Government.



It all started when Paul Revere got on his horse and fired warning shots while ringing those bells warning the British that we were going to be free. The British spotted him with their spy glass, and one of them said, "Captain! There is a crazy guy on shore rigning a bell and firing a single shot musket! We should retreat!" But the Captain didn't listen, and the rest is history (sort of).

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dRqaDrhgb8]SARAH PALIN GIVES HER VERSION OF PAUL REVERE'S RIDE - WHDH NEWS - YouTube[/ame]
 
Flanders,
It really makes no difference. If you lived in Polyneseia, you would be convinced that hula girls where plotting to enslave you.

To Vandalshandle: I certainly would if they had the power to tell me how to behave, who to work for, and were trying to disarm me so I couldn’t defend myself against them.

Well no.

1776 was a LIBERAL revolution against a CONSERVATIVE Government.

To Sallow: It was about sovereignty. It’s called The War For Independence. Rights only came after independence. A century or so later Socialists/Progressives laid the foundation for today’s liberalism. Notice that they are trying to abolish sovereignty at the same time they're taking Rights away.
 
I find it amazing how the extreme Right has made martyers out of the Davidians, who were, in fact, pedaphiles, child abusers, killers, and every bit as crazy as the people at Jonestown, armed to the teeth, and suicidal (complete with firebombs they set themselves).

The kids were being abused so dems decided to incinerate them...was that supposed to be some kind of therapy?
 
I find it amazing how the extreme Right has made martyers out of the Davidians, who were, in fact, pedaphiles, child abusers, killers, and every bit as crazy as the people at Jonestown, armed to the teeth, and suicidal (complete with firebombs they set themselves).

The kids were being abused so dems decided to incinerate them...was that supposed to be some kind of therapy?

Frank, if you decide to set your kids on fire because you don't like the government enforcing the law, nobody can stop you. However, don't blame it on the government. You would then simply be apprehended, dead or alive, as a muder suspect, who is armed and dangerous.
 
I find it amazing how the extreme Right has made martyers out of the Davidians, who were, in fact, pedaphiles, child abusers, killers, and every bit as crazy as the people at Jonestown, armed to the teeth, and suicidal (complete with firebombs they set themselves).

The kids were being abused so dems decided to incinerate them...was that supposed to be some kind of therapy?

Frank, if you decide to set your kids on fire because you don't like the government enforcing the law, nobody can stop you. However, don't blame it on the government. You would then simply be apprehended, dead or alive, as a muder suspect, who is armed and dangerous.

Your analogy fails...completely. The Davidians did not set their children on fire, the government did. As such, I fixed your post for you...

Frank, if you decide to abuse your kids because you don't like the government enforcing the law, the law can stop you. However, should the government murder your children to save them from your abuse, the government is out of control and ENTIRELY AT FAULT.

To think that burning the children alive, to save them from abuse, is rational indicates you are incompetent and ignorant.
 

Forum List

Back
Top