Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And apparently your ignorance includes the word culpabilityApparently your "degrees" did not include the meaning of the term "affirmative act".
No, I asked you to show me where it was inaccurate.LOL. You are the one calling it 'accurate history'. The responsibility lies with YOU to prove your statement.
1619 is NOT history. So says the author (before she tried to erase that history to suit herself, of course), so you are clearly and completely wrong and, here you are, still defending it and trying to re-frame the discussion. Not going to happen.
What you're really defending, of course, is yourself. You got used and will now dance to avoid that reality. Good luck with that.
No, I asked you to show me where it was inaccurate.
But since you never actually read anything that's not possible so you depend on old deleted tweets.
And, again, I ask which parts are inaccurate?No, I responded to your statement inferring that it is 'accurate history'
It isn't history, much less 'accurate history'.
And what would "culpability" have to do with the definition of an "affirmative act"?And apparently your ignorance includes the word culpability
Oh wait...
I forgot. As a MAGAT you think culpability only applies to PoC and LBGTQ+ people
And, again, I point out the fact that it is you that made a statement and must therefore defend it.And, again, I ask which parts are inaccurate?
And you don't know because you never actually read the work.
You speak from ignorance.
Because the entire study was the spread of syphilis among black communities. It would be pretty stupid to include whites. No one was studying whites.Not informing a victim and purposely allowing the disease to spread IS an affirmative act.
Why do you suppose there weren't any White people in the study?
Don't White people get syphilis too?
Did they give them fake medications?And what would "culpability" have to do with the definition of an "affirmative act"?
Take your time.
Then don't.And, again, I point out the fact that it is you that made a statement and must therefore defend it.
I am not responding to your red herring. Nor should I.
lol. I've proven beyond any doubt that this isn't history.Then don't.
You've already demonstrated you speak only from ignorance.
Dadoalex is your DADO!lol. I've proven beyond any doubt that this isn't history.
And still you ramble on, asking others to jump through hoops of your choosing, as if they are dancing poodles, while not even being able to defend your own statements.
I'm not sure if that makes you ignorant or just plain stupid.
That 1619 marks the founding of our country.You mean as opposed to the heroics of slaughtering unarmed women and children at Wounded Knee?
Which parts of 1619 are not "history?"
I have already given you inaccuracies. Did you skip over that part?Again, I ask which parts are inaccurate?
Alllwhile knowing you speak from the Arrogance of Ignorance.
reason.com
It has nothing to do with the founding of the country. The nation was formed as a country out of colonies in 1776. The Revolutionary War was not fought because the King outlawed slavery.1619 is one of the founding events of our country, just as important as Jamestown, more important than Plymouth Rock.
You still have no clue what "affirmative act" means.Did they withhold information that alternative treatments were available?
THAT is an affirmative act.
So you've never read the work but still stand here making claims about the content?lol. I've proven beyond any doubt that this isn't history.
And still you ramble on, asking others to jump through hoops of your choosing, as if they are dancing poodles, while not even being able to defend your own statements.
I'm not sure if that makes you ignorant or just plain stupid.
It introduced slavery, the institutional structures of slavery, the public policies regarding slavery. The "Revolutionary War" did nothing but maintain the status quo, the Constitution did nothing but enshrine the status quo.That 1619 marks the founding of our country.
We've already established you know nothing about the actual work and speak from ignorance about what others have told you.I have already given you inaccuracies. Did you skip over that part?
One of the more bizarre claims is that plantation owners invented double entry bookkeeping to maximize slaveholding profits. Microsoft Excell owes its use of spreadsheets to slavery.
The 1619 Project Unrepentantly Pushes Junk History
"I too yearn for universal justice," wrote Zora Neale Hurston in her autobiography, Dust Tracks on a Road, "but how to…
Junk history indeed.
No, it means doing OR REFUSING to do something knowing the probable outcome.You still have no clue what "affirmative act" means.
