I clicked on your link, it took me to Cosmopolitan.
And it's not surprising that a womans magazine would back a woman.
Tho I find it surprising that a womans magazine would back THAT womam
Chances are you know nothing factual about her, dupe. The whole article is quotes.
Chances are you know nothing factual about her,
And apparently you don't either or you would realize that the old hag is corrupt, dishonest, untrustworthy, unqualified, and doesn't have a good track record.
But I guess you're more content on remaining gullible and ignorant.
Enjoy your award stupid.
Actual EVIDENCE of any corruption or dishonesty, sexist angry old white man hater dupe? Masters in History here. You?
You got a "Masters in History". So what, big deal. You still continually prove that you really don't know shit about what the Hildabeast is really like. You only pretend to.
You're just another typical gullible and ignorant lib.
You have no evidence, just brainwashed Pubcrappe. Change the channel, hater dupes. Talk about gullible. I know, their charity is totally corrupt (No evidence), she's in bed with Wall St (ditto) etc etc etc (ditto)...
Total Pub Propaganda BS: ACORN, Kenyan Muslim Marxist,Tides, Mosque, Death Panel, lose your doctor, huge costs, DEBT CRISIS, Obama Recession, stimulus failed, Barney Frank, Nazi Soros, Nazi socialists, Volt suqs, Iran making bomb etc etc.



(ditto)
I'm sorry- dupes are lovely people- but I can't take their lazy, ignorant, careless, stupid politics a minute longer. Sorry