RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,568
- 290
So, you are going to move somewhere where there is no government?
11,000 SCIENTISTS for climate change? JUST KIDDING
- Thread starter The Purge
- Start date
RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,568
- 290
Man is behind what is happening right now. Quit being such an Ass.
Eric Arthur Blair
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2015
- 25,955
- 15,967
- 1,415
The kind who doesn't claim to be a scientist when he quite obviously isn't.
Btw...wearing a lab coat in junior high school science class while you dissect a frog doesn't make you a scientist
....ass ****.
RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,568
- 290
Sorry assfuck, but Climategate was debunked years ago.IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud
Global warming alarmists are scrambling to save face after hackers stole hundreds of incriminating e-mails from a British university and published them on the Internet.
The messages were pirated from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia (UEA) and reveal correspondence between British and American researchers engaged in fraudulent reporting of data to favor their own climate change agenda. UEA officials confirmed one of their servers was hacked, and several of the scientists involved admitted the authenticity of the messages, according to the New York Times. The article opined, "The evidence pointing to a growing human contribution to global warming is so widely accepted that the hacked material is unlikely to erode the overall argument."
Climatologist Patrick J. Michaels challenged that position. "This is not a smoking gun, this is a mushroom cloud." The e-mails implicate scores of researchers, most of whom are associated with the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), an organization many skeptics believe was created exclusively to provide evidence of anthropogenic global warming (AGW).
Among the IPCC elite embarrassingly, if not criminally, compromised is Phillip D. Jones, a Ph.D. climatologist at the University of East Anglia whose work figured prominently in the IPCC Third Assessment Report of 2001. Jones also contributed significantly to the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report in 2007 (AR4), but he failed to follow through when skeptical investigators asked to review raw data associated with that report. They announced intent to use UK Freedom of Information laws to obtain the data, so Jones sent the following e-mail to one of his collaborators: "Mike, Can you delete any e-mails you may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise.... Can you also e-mail Gene and get him to do the same?... Will be getting Caspar to do likewise." The Mike in this message is Michael Mann, professor of meteorology at Pennsylvania State University, whose influential "hockey stick" graph warning of pending global warming eco-catastrophe was found by a congressional investigation to be fraudulent. In another correspondence about AR4 labeled HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL, Jones contacted Mann regarding research critical of their global warming platform. "I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report," wrote Jones. "Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"
Carter Financial Group
We will help achieve your financial goals and will give you sound guidance
http://carterfinancial.fixedincomecounsel.com
Mann received another incriminating e-mail from Dr. Kevin Trenberth, a New Zealander now with the University of Colorado and Head of the Climate Analysis Section at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. "The fact is we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't." An incredulous Trenberth simply blamed "our [inadequate] observing system." Yet he and his colleagues are now dodging the "Climategate" bullet, indignant that global warming skeptics are supposedly taking their comments out of context. One wonders if they might be referring to a message from Jones who wrote about a statistical "trick" he used to "hide" data. Or perhaps they mean Mann's reference to climate change skeptics as "idiots."
Now that AGW is revealed as a farce, will big-spending politicians in the U.S. Senate halt efforts to impose a cap-and-trade system to ostensibly combat greenhouse gases and global warming? Of course not. Cap and trade is about raising taxes and increasing government control over our entire economy. Our socialist politicians in Washington will never stop pushing this issue, even if global-warming alarmism is disproven to the point that Hell really does freeze over.
Will widespread and irrefutable knowledge of scientific fraud silence the socialist promoters of a new United Nations Climate Change protocol? Nonsense. In the name of saving the planet, the UN Copenhagen Treaty they intend to impose on the world would help to shackle it. Specifically, their "green" agenda would impose international controls, diminish the industrial might and living standards of developed nations, and transfer wealth from rich countries to poorer ones in an emerging world government. Internationalists and socialists will not back away from their long-sought-after global designs simply because the "science" supporting runaway global warming is shown to be flawed. No doubt they will continue to demand retributions for climate debt from the United States and the largely agreeable EU, despite Trenberth's observed "lack of warming."
The good thing is that even more than in the past, these false scientists and their alarmism will be countered with their own words. Even now reliable researchers are compiling the information in a publication that should shake our nation — and maybe even a few Democratic politicians.
IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud
Maybe you should look at a graph of average global temperatures & see that the line is not a straight smooth line but rather zig zagged.
RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,568
- 290
So at least you admit that you have no basis for your comments.
I have degrees in mathematics.
RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,568
- 290
Your doctor tells you to quit smoking or you could get lung cancer.
You quit smoking & then call your doctor a liar because you did not get lung cancer,
This is how ******* stupid you are.
In the late 1980's, a scientists says that if we allow our emission s to increase as they were then, the Arctic could be ice free on 2014. Action is taken & the growth of emissions greatly slowed. The Arctic is not ice free & you ignorant ***** dance naked around the fire.
Eric Arthur Blair
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2015
- 25,955
- 15,967
- 1,415
LOL...I've done nothing of the kind.
I don't believe it but even if so that doesn't make you a "scientist".
- Thread starter
- #188
When stupid becomes funny....we picture Daveyboy. Here!
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 91,655
- 83,342
- 3,615
No, he isn't. That is just a theory made up by "scientists" who use it to get funding.
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 91,655
- 83,342
- 3,615
Lies. Your cult was exposed cooking the books, manipulating data, and destroying data so they wouldn't have to turn it over.Sorry assfuck, but Climategate was debunked years ago.IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud
Global warming alarmists are scrambling to save face after hackers stole hundreds of incriminating e-mails from a British university and published them on the Internet.
The messages were pirated from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia (UEA) and reveal correspondence between British and American researchers engaged in fraudulent reporting of data to favor their own climate change agenda. UEA officials confirmed one of their servers was hacked, and several of the scientists involved admitted the authenticity of the messages, according to the New York Times. The article opined, "The evidence pointing to a growing human contribution to global warming is so widely accepted that the hacked material is unlikely to erode the overall argument."
Climatologist Patrick J. Michaels challenged that position. "This is not a smoking gun, this is a mushroom cloud." The e-mails implicate scores of researchers, most of whom are associated with the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), an organization many skeptics believe was created exclusively to provide evidence of anthropogenic global warming (AGW).
Among the IPCC elite embarrassingly, if not criminally, compromised is Phillip D. Jones, a Ph.D. climatologist at the University of East Anglia whose work figured prominently in the IPCC Third Assessment Report of 2001. Jones also contributed significantly to the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report in 2007 (AR4), but he failed to follow through when skeptical investigators asked to review raw data associated with that report. They announced intent to use UK Freedom of Information laws to obtain the data, so Jones sent the following e-mail to one of his collaborators: "Mike, Can you delete any e-mails you may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise.... Can you also e-mail Gene and get him to do the same?... Will be getting Caspar to do likewise." The Mike in this message is Michael Mann, professor of meteorology at Pennsylvania State University, whose influential "hockey stick" graph warning of pending global warming eco-catastrophe was found by a congressional investigation to be fraudulent. In another correspondence about AR4 labeled HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL, Jones contacted Mann regarding research critical of their global warming platform. "I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report," wrote Jones. "Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"
Carter Financial Group
We will help achieve your financial goals and will give you sound guidance
http://carterfinancial.fixedincomecounsel.com
Mann received another incriminating e-mail from Dr. Kevin Trenberth, a New Zealander now with the University of Colorado and Head of the Climate Analysis Section at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. "The fact is we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't." An incredulous Trenberth simply blamed "our [inadequate] observing system." Yet he and his colleagues are now dodging the "Climategate" bullet, indignant that global warming skeptics are supposedly taking their comments out of context. One wonders if they might be referring to a message from Jones who wrote about a statistical "trick" he used to "hide" data. Or perhaps they mean Mann's reference to climate change skeptics as "idiots."
Now that AGW is revealed as a farce, will big-spending politicians in the U.S. Senate halt efforts to impose a cap-and-trade system to ostensibly combat greenhouse gases and global warming? Of course not. Cap and trade is about raising taxes and increasing government control over our entire economy. Our socialist politicians in Washington will never stop pushing this issue, even if global-warming alarmism is disproven to the point that Hell really does freeze over.
Will widespread and irrefutable knowledge of scientific fraud silence the socialist promoters of a new United Nations Climate Change protocol? Nonsense. In the name of saving the planet, the UN Copenhagen Treaty they intend to impose on the world would help to shackle it. Specifically, their "green" agenda would impose international controls, diminish the industrial might and living standards of developed nations, and transfer wealth from rich countries to poorer ones in an emerging world government. Internationalists and socialists will not back away from their long-sought-after global designs simply because the "science" supporting runaway global warming is shown to be flawed. No doubt they will continue to demand retributions for climate debt from the United States and the largely agreeable EU, despite Trenberth's observed "lack of warming."
The good thing is that even more than in the past, these false scientists and their alarmism will be countered with their own words. Even now reliable researchers are compiling the information in a publication that should shake our nation — and maybe even a few Democratic politicians.
IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud
Maybe you should look at a graph of average global temperatures & see that the line is not a straight smooth line but rather zig zagged.
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 91,655
- 83,342
- 3,615
And you think that makes you climate expert?
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 91,655
- 83,342
- 3,615
Your lil Dr scenario makes zero sense.......much like all your posts.
- Jan 19, 2010
- 84,340
- 84,992
- 3,605
I'm not going to allow them to frighten me into submission like you obviously have....
keepitreal
Platinum Member
Ignoring science
LIKE THERE ARE OVER 100 GENDERS
******* up your children's future
LIKE OUR CHILDREN'S, CHILDREN'S CHILDREN
WHO HAVEN'T BEEN BORN YET BUT OWE
THE GOVERNMENT MONEY, ASSWIPE
Similar threads
New Topics
-
I Still Don't Think That Trump Is Perfect BUT I Just Became A Trump Supporter Again 😁- Started by ChristisKing
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
-
Recommend a special section on board for the TDS affected
- Latest: ChristisKing
-
-
