Wrong, douche bag. Mathematics says Mann's hockey stick graph is a fraud. Anyone with a brain can understand what's wrong with it after reading McIntrye's analysis. However, gullible douche bags like you will continue to insist that it's valid. What else can you do? To admit the truth means to admit that AGW is a con.
'Fess up, cultist. You have no clue of what McIntyre's analysis said. You're just repeating what your cult tells you to say.
A normal human being, when he sees that the whole planet says he's wrong, he considers the strong probability that he is wrong. Alas, most deniers have a raging narcissism problem. They simply refuse to believe that they or their holy cult could have made a mistake.
But then, maybe you're right. Maybe your tiny fringe political cult is the only group on the planet to understand TheRealTruth. I'm sure it makes you feel all special to believe that. That's how the cult sucks you in, playing on your emotions like that.
ROFL! No, he found a rather large error that shows that even random noise fed into his computer programs will produce a hockey stick.
That's a complete fiction on your part. Here's some science detailing the many ways your DearLeaderMcIntyre screwed up and lied. You'll now refuse to look at it, scream it's a socialist plot, and then cry at me even harder.
Debunking the Hockey Stick
moyhu: Effect of selection in the Wegman Report
First, McIntyre didn't feed in random noise. He fed in data with a hockey stick signal.
Second, he did 10,000 runs, then discarded the 9,900 that didn't show a major hockey stick, and then claimed they all showed a major hockey stick.
That's why no reputable scientists will speak with McIntyre, because he's kind of an open fraud.
Also, many of his proxies were shown to be invalid, like the bristlecone pine data, which varies with rainfall, not temperature.
And here's some more science debunking that conspiracy fable. You know, more stuff for you to ignore, more reasons for you to rant about socialist plots.
Hey Ya! (mal)
The bottom line is that you're a douche bag bald faced liar. There's no point in arguing with a liar.
Awwww, did the truth trigger you again, Snowflake? I am not sorry for bursting your PC bubble. You pajama-boys need to be dragged kicking and screaming into the real world.
I quoted the judge, moron.
And that doesn't refute my point at all, that Steyn is lying about Mann not wanting discovery. Mann very badly wants it. He just doesn't want to do the same thing twice for no reason.
First you said he wanted to drag the case on. Now you admit he didn't want to drag the case on. Mann is the one who wants the case to drag on because that means more time and money that Steyn has to expend on it, and imposing a heavy cost on Steyn was Mann's intention all along.
Your chain of thought there can not be deciphered by our mere earth-logic. According to you, Steyn filed motion after motion to delay because he wanted a fast trial, and Mann is not doing that because he wants to delay. Riiiiight.
Please provide a link so I can judge for myself what the judge ruled.
http://www.dccourts.gov/internet/documents/14-CV-101_14-CV-126.pdf
---
As a preliminary matter, we hold that we have jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine to hear appellants’ interlocutory appeals of the trial court’s denial of their special motions to dismiss filed under the Anti-SLAPP Act. We further hold that the Anti-SLAPP Act’s “likely to succeed” standard for overcoming a properly filed special motion to dismiss requires that the plaintiff present evidence — not simply allegations — and that the evidence must be legally sufficient to permit a jury properly instructed on the applicable constitutional standards to reasonably find in the plaintiff’s favor. Having conducted an independent review of the evidence to ensure that it surmounts the constitutionally required threshold, we conclude that Dr. Mann has presented evidence sufficient to defeat the special motions to dismiss as to some of his claims. Accordingly, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.
---
BTW, we are talking about the DC court of appeals, which means a leftwing kangaroo court.
Good idea, getting your excuses for losing out there early.
Let's see what else the judge said.
---
On the current record, where the notion that the emails support that Dr.Mann has engaged in misconduct has been so definitively discredited, a reasonable jury could, if it so chooses, doubt the veracity of appellants’ claimed honest belief in that very notion. A jury could find, by clear and convincing evidence, that appellants “in fact entertained serious doubts” or had a “high degree of awareness” that the accusations that Dr. Mann engaged in scientific misconduct, fraud, and deception, were false, and, as a result, acted “with reckless disregard” for the statements’ truth when they were published.
---
Ouch.
Funny thing about courts, they take a dim view of conspiracy bullshit. And as that's all you have, your boys are in trouble.
Judith Curry@curryja
That, of course, is called reasoned judgment ( the opposite of mental case btw ). You k00ks are no different than that OCD guy that cant leave his house because he still thinks his hands are dirty. Same thing s0n.
The majority are not mental cases because of what they see in their environment = people freezing their balls off just like 20 years ago and seeing that the hundreds of predictions by you goofballs make always fall flat on their face.
