Yuge impeachment backlash w/independent voters

[Siete]

Did the Starr White Water investigation allow Clinton to call witnesses or question any of the witnesses? Nope. Not to worry, your Imperial Majesty will have the same rights as Clinton had.

Name specifically when the Clintons requested to have witnesses testify and be interviewed by Democrats and cross examined by Republicans.

Your comparison seems to not make sense.

The answer is no, they didn't allow it.

When the Republican House was investigating Obama in secret without Democrats present, were democrats allowed to call witnesses in his defense?

Is that part of due process, where the one being investigated can question the investigators?

No only do you guys want to eat the cake but you also don't want anyone else to have cake at all.

The REPUBLICANS blocked THE DEMOCRATS from calling witnesses in the Whitewater investigation?

Are you sure about that?

During Ken Starr's multiple investigations.

FACT CHECK: Is The Trump Impeachment Process Different From Nixon And Clinton?

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., has laid out additional details about the minority party's role for his panel.

As Impeachment Inquiry Moves Into Open Phase, Here's What To Expect Next
The president or his attorneys will be allowed to cross-examine witness and subpoena their own, although they'll need a majority vote or the concurrence of the chair to do so. They will also be allowed to attend all hearings of the Judiciary Committee, including any that are closed to the public.

Democrats say that these same rights were given to the minority party with Clinton in the late 1990s and Nixon in the mid-1970s.

What the article stated is that Republicans were allowed to call in witnesses, provided that Schiff approved of it. Obviously he didn't because we didn't see any witnesses brought forth by Republicans.

I didn't see anything that said Democrats wanted to bring in witnesses, but were forbidden.

Trump wouldn't let witnesses testify -

try and let that soak in

 

[ColonelAngus]

Odd That Shifty didn’t let the whistleblower testify.

Dimms going to impeach based on hearsay.

So Dimm.

 

[BlindBoo]

Poll finds sharp swing in opposition to impeachment among independents

The Socialist Liberty-haters are happy, but normal Americans, especially in swing states, support Trump more now than before the latest Hoax.

Great news for America.

WI Obama-Trump voters give Trump 70% favorability.

You are stupidly equating opposition to impeachment with a belief that he is innocent and a sign of support for him. There are other reason to oppose impeachment.

It is a waste of time when you lack the votes in the Senate to convict and remove. Go ahead and make the argument that it will show the nation how the GOP will turn a blind eye to whatever Trump does but the reality is the average voter attention span is not long enough to remember by November 2020.

Censure is the correct course but the Democrats went the wrong way as usual...

You may be overlooking the "show trial" opportunity that the Republicans can offer. Just imagine that Trump's defense team wants to show that the "deep state" in collusion with the democrats and MSM have been unfair to the Trump presidency from day-1. The witness list could include Schiff, Ciaramella (WB), Chalupa, Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Strzok, Page, the Ohrs, Rosenstein, and the rest of the deep state conspirators as part of the "insurance policy" against Trump.

It could be the photo-negative of the schitt show helping Trump and hurting the democrats.

Kewl, then the Democrats could call all the material witnesses like Mike, Mick and Rudy to testify as to who sent them on their political errand in the Ukraine and how they subverted official policy to achieve The Don's goal.

They don't get to call witnesses in the Senate. Republicans make the rules there.

Turnabout and stuff......

Isn't that determined by the presiding judge. Chief Justice Roberts.

 

[Siete]

Odd That Shifty didn’t let the whistleblower testify.

Dimms going to impeach based on hearsay.

So Dimm.

not odd -

kept the republicans from spinning an impeachment proceeding into a criminal debate - aka deflection.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Name specifically when the Clintons requested to have witnesses testify and be interviewed by Democrats and cross examined by Republicans.

Your comparison seems to not make sense.

The answer is no, they didn't allow it.

When the Republican House was investigating Obama in secret without Democrats present, were democrats allowed to call witnesses in his defense?

Is that part of due process, where the one being investigated can question the investigators?

No only do you guys want to eat the cake but you also don't want anyone else to have cake at all.

The REPUBLICANS blocked THE DEMOCRATS from calling witnesses in the Whitewater investigation?

Are you sure about that?

During Ken Starr's multiple investigations.

FACT CHECK: Is The Trump Impeachment Process Different From Nixon And Clinton?

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., has laid out additional details about the minority party's role for his panel.

As Impeachment Inquiry Moves Into Open Phase, Here's What To Expect Next
The president or his attorneys will be allowed to cross-examine witness and subpoena their own, although they'll need a majority vote or the concurrence of the chair to do so. They will also be allowed to attend all hearings of the Judiciary Committee, including any that are closed to the public.

Democrats say that these same rights were given to the minority party with Clinton in the late 1990s and Nixon in the mid-1970s.

What the article stated is that Republicans were allowed to call in witnesses, provided that Schiff approved of it. Obviously he didn't because we didn't see any witnesses brought forth by Republicans.

I didn't see anything that said Democrats wanted to bring in witnesses, but were forbidden.

Trump wouldn't let witnesses testify -

try and let that soak in

He didn't let his people get setup for a perjury trap. And they knew all along to protect the information of the executive, they wouldn't be able to answer some questions, which then the Democrats would use to say they were hiding something.

The entire inquiry was with your witnesses--none of ours. Sorry you couldn't get every last one you wanted, but I think the scale was tilted pretty heavy for your side even without them.

 

[ColonelAngus]

The answer is no, they didn't allow it.

When the Republican House was investigating Obama in secret without Democrats present, were democrats allowed to call witnesses in his defense?

Is that part of due process, where the one being investigated can question the investigators?

No only do you guys want to eat the cake but you also don't want anyone else to have cake at all.

The REPUBLICANS blocked THE DEMOCRATS from calling witnesses in the Whitewater investigation?

Are you sure about that?

During Ken Starr's multiple investigations.

FACT CHECK: Is The Trump Impeachment Process Different From Nixon And Clinton?

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., has laid out additional details about the minority party's role for his panel.

As Impeachment Inquiry Moves Into Open Phase, Here's What To Expect Next
The president or his attorneys will be allowed to cross-examine witness and subpoena their own, although they'll need a majority vote or the concurrence of the chair to do so. They will also be allowed to attend all hearings of the Judiciary Committee, including any that are closed to the public.

Democrats say that these same rights were given to the minority party with Clinton in the late 1990s and Nixon in the mid-1970s.

What the article stated is that Republicans were allowed to call in witnesses, provided that Schiff approved of it. Obviously he didn't because we didn't see any witnesses brought forth by Republicans.

I didn't see anything that said Democrats wanted to bring in witnesses, but were forbidden.

Trump wouldn't let witnesses testify -

try and let that soak in

He didn't let his people get setup for a perjury trap. And they knew all along to protect the information of the executive, they wouldn't be able to answer some questions, which then the Democrats would use to say they were hiding something.

The entire inquiry was with your witnesses--none of ours. Sorry you couldn't get every last one you wanted, but I think the scale was tilted pretty heavy for your side even without them.

I swear Shifty was jerking off under the desk. He loved the attention and he ran it like a whiny bitch

 

[Siete]

The answer is no, they didn't allow it.

When the Republican House was investigating Obama in secret without Democrats present, were democrats allowed to call witnesses in his defense?

Is that part of due process, where the one being investigated can question the investigators?

No only do you guys want to eat the cake but you also don't want anyone else to have cake at all.

The REPUBLICANS blocked THE DEMOCRATS from calling witnesses in the Whitewater investigation?

Are you sure about that?

During Ken Starr's multiple investigations.

FACT CHECK: Is The Trump Impeachment Process Different From Nixon And Clinton?

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., has laid out additional details about the minority party's role for his panel.

As Impeachment Inquiry Moves Into Open Phase, Here's What To Expect Next
The president or his attorneys will be allowed to cross-examine witness and subpoena their own, although they'll need a majority vote or the concurrence of the chair to do so. They will also be allowed to attend all hearings of the Judiciary Committee, including any that are closed to the public.

Democrats say that these same rights were given to the minority party with Clinton in the late 1990s and Nixon in the mid-1970s.

What the article stated is that Republicans were allowed to call in witnesses, provided that Schiff approved of it. Obviously he didn't because we didn't see any witnesses brought forth by Republicans.

I didn't see anything that said Democrats wanted to bring in witnesses, but were forbidden.

Trump wouldn't let witnesses testify -

try and let that soak in

He didn't let his people get setup for a perjury trap. And they knew all along to protect the information of the executive, they wouldn't be able to answer some questions, which then the Democrats would use to say they were hiding something.

The entire inquiry was with your witnesses--none of ours. Sorry you couldn't get every last one you wanted, but I think the scale was tilted pretty heavy for your side even without them.

the House controls the rules - its their impeachment investigation ...

 

[BlindBoo]

Did the Starr White Water investigation allow Clinton to call witnesses or question any of the witnesses? Nope. Not to worry, your Imperial Majesty will have the same rights as Clinton had.

Name specifically when the Clintons requested to have witnesses testify and be interviewed by Democrats and cross examined by Republicans.

Your comparison seems to not make sense.

The answer is no, they didn't allow it.

When the Republican House was investigating Obama in secret without Democrats present, were democrats allowed to call witnesses in his defense?

Is that part of due process, where the one being investigated can question the investigators?

No only do you guys want to eat the cake but you also don't want anyone else to have cake at all.

The REPUBLICANS blocked THE DEMOCRATS from calling witnesses in the Whitewater investigation?

Are you sure about that?

During Ken Starr's multiple investigations.

FACT CHECK: Is The Trump Impeachment Process Different From Nixon And Clinton?

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., has laid out additional details about the minority party's role for his panel.

As Impeachment Inquiry Moves Into Open Phase, Here's What To Expect Next
The president or his attorneys will be allowed to cross-examine witness and subpoena their own, although they'll need a majority vote or the concurrence of the chair to do so. They will also be allowed to attend all hearings of the Judiciary Committee, including any that are closed to the public.

Democrats say that these same rights were given to the minority party with Clinton in the late 1990s and Nixon in the mid-1970s.

What the article stated is that Republicans were allowed to call in witnesses, provided that Schiff approved of it. Obviously he didn't because we didn't see any witnesses brought forth by Republicans.

I didn't see anything that said Democrats wanted to bring in witnesses, but were forbidden.

I bet you won't find any examples of Nixon's legal team asking to call witnesses and cross examine witnesses in Archbald Cox's or Leon Jaworski's investigations either. But when it got to the Judiciary committee they could.

 

[BluesLegend]

Even Schiff is going wobbly. They might just go for censure and be done with it. Except that Schiff is promising more investigations. At this point Schiff is just wasting money.

I warned the idiot Dems, Americans root for the underdog and if there's one thing we hate its cheating referees and unfair calls. We are in the middle of football season hello.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The REPUBLICANS blocked THE DEMOCRATS from calling witnesses in the Whitewater investigation?

Are you sure about that?

During Ken Starr's multiple investigations.

FACT CHECK: Is The Trump Impeachment Process Different From Nixon And Clinton?

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., has laid out additional details about the minority party's role for his panel.

As Impeachment Inquiry Moves Into Open Phase, Here's What To Expect Next
The president or his attorneys will be allowed to cross-examine witness and subpoena their own, although they'll need a majority vote or the concurrence of the chair to do so. They will also be allowed to attend all hearings of the Judiciary Committee, including any that are closed to the public.

Democrats say that these same rights were given to the minority party with Clinton in the late 1990s and Nixon in the mid-1970s.

What the article stated is that Republicans were allowed to call in witnesses, provided that Schiff approved of it. Obviously he didn't because we didn't see any witnesses brought forth by Republicans.

I didn't see anything that said Democrats wanted to bring in witnesses, but were forbidden.

Trump wouldn't let witnesses testify -

try and let that soak in

He didn't let his people get setup for a perjury trap. And they knew all along to protect the information of the executive, they wouldn't be able to answer some questions, which then the Democrats would use to say they were hiding something.

The entire inquiry was with your witnesses--none of ours. Sorry you couldn't get every last one you wanted, but I think the scale was tilted pretty heavy for your side even without them.

the House controls the rules - its their impeachment investigation ...

Yes it is. They are going to impeach a President using their witnesses only, and keeping their sources hidden from not only our representatives, but the public as well.

This is what Democrats refer to as transparency and bringing America together.

 

[BluesLegend]

During Ken Starr's multiple investigations.

FACT CHECK: Is The Trump Impeachment Process Different From Nixon And Clinton?

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., has laid out additional details about the minority party's role for his panel.

As Impeachment Inquiry Moves Into Open Phase, Here's What To Expect Next
The president or his attorneys will be allowed to cross-examine witness and subpoena their own, although they'll need a majority vote or the concurrence of the chair to do so. They will also be allowed to attend all hearings of the Judiciary Committee, including any that are closed to the public.

Democrats say that these same rights were given to the minority party with Clinton in the late 1990s and Nixon in the mid-1970s.

What the article stated is that Republicans were allowed to call in witnesses, provided that Schiff approved of it. Obviously he didn't because we didn't see any witnesses brought forth by Republicans.

I didn't see anything that said Democrats wanted to bring in witnesses, but were forbidden.

Trump wouldn't let witnesses testify -

try and let that soak in

He didn't let his people get setup for a perjury trap. And they knew all along to protect the information of the executive, they wouldn't be able to answer some questions, which then the Democrats would use to say they were hiding something.

The entire inquiry was with your witnesses--none of ours. Sorry you couldn't get every last one you wanted, but I think the scale was tilted pretty heavy for your side even without them.

the House controls the rules - its their impeachment investigation ...

Yes it is. They are going to impeach a President using their witnesses only, and keeping their sources hidden from not only our representatives, but the public as well.

This is what Democrats refer to as transparency and bringing America together.

A show of hands, who hates Dems even more after this show trial?

 

[ColonelAngus]

Pelosi said this is about defending the constitution and it’s ok if they lose the house in 2020 because she is going to do the right thing.

That’s about the funniest fucking thing I have ever heard. Fuck Chapelle. That is fucking gold!!!!

Oh yea, those Dimms are Constitutional purists!

 

[BluesLegend]

Pelosi said this is about defending the constitution and it’s ok if they lose the house in 2020 because she is going to do the right thing.

That’s about the funniest fucking thing I have ever heard. Fuck Chapelle. That is fucking gold!!!!

Oh yea, those Dimms are Constitutional purists!

The Dem party has become a laughing stock. Trump's 24/7 trolling of Dem's has unhinged them

 

[HenryBHough]

When does Biden-the-younger leave for Ukraine to testify?

Oh wait....would he have the balls?

 

[ColonelAngus]

Pelosi said this is about defending the constitution and it’s ok if they lose the house in 2020 because she is going to do the right thing.

That’s about the funniest fucking thing I have ever heard. Fuck Chapelle. That is fucking gold!!!!

Oh yea, those Dimms are Constitutional purists!

The Dem party has become a laughing stock. Trump's 24/7 trolling of Dem's has unhinged them

Pelosi is like Susan B Anthony! What an amazing woman! She will sacrifice house majority to impeach Trump to DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION!!!!

(Except the 2nd Ammendment)
(And maybe change the first amendment for hate speech)

 

[BluesLegend]

Pelosi said this is about defending the constitution and it’s ok if they lose the house in 2020 because she is going to do the right thing.

That’s about the funniest fucking thing I have ever heard. Fuck Chapelle. That is fucking gold!!!!

Oh yea, those Dimms are Constitutional purists!

The Dem party has become a laughing stock. Trump's 24/7 trolling of Dem's has unhinged them

Pelosi is like Susan B Anthony! What an amazing woman! She will sacrifice house majority to impeach Trump to DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION!!!!

(Except the 2nd Ammendment)
(And maybe change the first amendment for hate speech)

Pelosi is basically the new George Washington. /sarcasm