Where?
Article I Section 8 of the US Constitution
"Section 8. The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; ...."
Where does one end and the other begin? Would you feel safe being a passenger in a plane whose pilot is a cocaine addict? How about being the patient of a surgeon who is addicted? Would you trust your auto mechanic if he or she was a heroin addict? You seem to assume that addicts are junkies on the street, but oftentimes, they hold jobs and put other people's welfare at risk. The addict is not the best judge of when they are putting other people's lives and welfare in danger.You have a right to be a danger to yourself.
I've never advocated being a danger to others... and that's the difference between freedom and anarchy
Thanks, but I didn't come up with the Law of Supply and Demand. I believe you have me confused with Adam Smith, the author of "The Wealth of Nations".... by the way, just because you may come up with a rare exception to the law does not make it invalid. Most economic theory uses that very law for its foundation. You might as well try to argue that Newton's Laws of Motion are invalid simply because they break down at speeds close to the speed of light.Besides, I was just pointing out a flaw in Karl's "law." The flaw is 100% valid, and even has a name