- Thread starter
- #81
Who will you vote for in November and why?I'm surprised you're being so obtuse ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Who will you vote for in November and why?I'm surprised you're being so obtuse ...
Who will you vote for in November and why?
You should be afraid and you should actFear combined with hope can motivate the public to act rather than make people feel helpless
Opinion: I’m a climate scientist. If you knew what I know, you’d be terrified too
The author is not seeking or bought by political science funding. When will you fuckwits realize that the ONLY people with a political agenda here are the deniers because the oil company PR people found that the easiest way to sell their stories to the ignorant: cognitive dissonance.You should be afraid and you should act
No and no.
If you knew what I know, you’d be terrified too
Again no because I'm not seeking/bought by political science funding.
All climate scientists are bought.The author is not seeking or bought by political science funding. When will you fuckwits realize that the ONLY people with a political agenda here are the deniers because the oil company PR people found that the easiest way to sell their stories to the ignorant: cognitive dissonance.
The author is not seeking or bought by political science funding. When will you fuckwits realize that the ONLY people with a political agenda here are the deniers because the oil company PR people found that the easiest way to sell their stories to the ignorant: cognitive dissonance.
What evidence do you have to support your charge that they are bought (and by whom), that climate science is not mainstream science and that mainstream science disagrees with climate science and AGW? I'd put down money that the answer is "NONE".All climate scientists are bought.
I don't buy any stories, I just follow proven mainstream science, not the political bought stuff for gullibles.
For example, the UK Climate Resilience Programme provided £18.7mn funding from 2018 to 2023. The Met Office is funded by climate money too.What evidence do you have to support your charge that they are bought (and by whom), that climate science is not mainstream science and that mainstream science disagrees with climate science and AGW? I'd put down money that the answer is "NONE".
When will you fuckwits realize that the ONLY people with a political agenda here are the deniers because the oil company PR people found that the easiest way to sell their stories to the ignorant: cognitive dissonance.
Do you believe CO2 levels in the atmosphere are rising?The renewable industry agenda is almost a copy/paste of the past oil industries public relations shtick , inclusive of just as many shill pols Cric.....
~S~
That’s an add set of questions for a purportedly scientific topic.Do you believe CO2 levels in the atmosphere are rising?
Do you believe that is due to human CO2 emissions?
Do you believe the planet is getting warmer?
Do you believe data on upward long wave radiation from the warmed Earth?
Do you believe the absorption spectrum data provided for CO2?
Do you believe in the greenhouse effect?
Do you believe the theory of anthropogenic global warming?
I believe the renewable industry along with their shill pols are all about using what you've wrote to blind us with fear, for their benefit CrickDo you believe CO2 levels in the atmosphere are rising?
Do you believe that is due to human CO2 emissions?
Do you believe the planet is getting warmer?
Do you believe data on upward long wave radiation from the warmed Earth?
Do you believe the absorption spectrum data provided for CO2?
Do you believe in the greenhouse effect?
Do you believe the theory of anthropogenic global warming?
Seven “do you believe” questions sounds more like a religious catechism,
To whom do you refer with "shill pols"? And what have I written that you believe they are using?I believe the renewable industry along with their shill pols are all about using what you've wrote to blind us with fear, for their benefit Crick
~S~
any involved.......To whom do you refer with "shill pols"?
You don't think the people regulating the fossil fuel industries have some experience in the fossil fuel industries? Now what is it that I have been writing that these politicians are all using to blind folks with fear?any involved.......
fact is, our state's renewable energy commission is made up entirely of individuals in the renewable energy industry
that would be a 'shill politician' , one who is legislates for his/her own back pocket
~S~
experience differs from vested interest CrickYou don't think the people regulating the fossil fuel industries have some experience in the fossil fuel industries? Now what is it that I have been writing that these politicians are all using to blind folks with fear?
Show us that one group contains experience and the other, vested interest and that the two attributes can't coexist in an individual.experience differs from vested interest Crick
~S~