Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So if I copy the story of Santa Claus he becomes real?Sure it.Copying isn’t proof.The proof you seek is in the +24,000 written manuscripts which detail his works.So you can't prove that Jesus performed any miracles. Got it. So all those miracles in the NT, all made up. Got it.But I am proof, Taz. 100% proof.You're deluded self is not proof.
God is mystery that is meant to be experienced.
Probably not. But in the case of Christ it wasn't one person copying it and it wasn't just one thing that was being copying.So if I copy the story of Santa Claus he becomes real?Sure it.Copying isn’t proof.The proof you seek is in the +24,000 written manuscripts which detail his works.So you can't prove that Jesus performed any miracles. Got it. So all those miracles in the NT, all made up. Got it.But I am proof, Taz. 100% proof.
God is mystery that is meant to be experienced.
Kids experience Santa every year and thinks he's real, WAY more than 24,000. Which makes you wrong. Again.Probably not. But in the case of Christ it wasn't one person copying it and it wasn't just one thing that was being copying.So if I copy the story of Santa Claus he becomes real?Sure it.Copying isn’t proof.The proof you seek is in the +24,000 written manuscripts which detail his works.So you can't prove that Jesus performed any miracles. Got it. So all those miracles in the NT, all made up. Got it.
God is mystery that is meant to be experienced.
Of course the final test would be if you copied a story of Santa and tried experiencing him. Since Santa isn't real, you wouldn't be getting any presents. Christ is real, and if you seek him, you will get presents. Lots and lots of presents.
Except with Christ they detailed all of the miracles he performed, his crucifixion and resurrection. It really did happen.Kids experience Santa every year and thinks he's real, WAY more than 24,000. Which makes you wrong. Again.Probably not. But in the case of Christ it wasn't one person copying it and it wasn't just one thing that was being copying.So if I copy the story of Santa Claus he becomes real?Sure it.Copying isn’t proof.The proof you seek is in the +24,000 written manuscripts which detail his works.
God is mystery that is meant to be experienced.
Of course the final test would be if you copied a story of Santa and tried experiencing him. Since Santa isn't real, you wouldn't be getting any presents. Christ is real, and if you seek him, you will get presents. Lots and lots of presents.
Christ is real and will give you lots of presents? What kind of messed up tree goes with that nonsense?
Written by people several generations after the facts by people who didn't witness anything. And nobody has been able to prove otherwise.Except with Christ they detailed all of the miracles he performed, his crucifixion and resurrection. It really did happen.Kids experience Santa every year and thinks he's real, WAY more than 24,000. Which makes you wrong. Again.Probably not. But in the case of Christ it wasn't one person copying it and it wasn't just one thing that was being copying.So if I copy the story of Santa Claus he becomes real?Sure it.Copying isn’t proof.
Of course the final test would be if you copied a story of Santa and tried experiencing him. Since Santa isn't real, you wouldn't be getting any presents. Christ is real, and if you seek him, you will get presents. Lots and lots of presents.
Christ is real and will give you lots of presents? What kind of messed up tree goes with that nonsense?
No, not several generations. 25 years. History is recorded by people who witnessed it, Taz.Written by people several generations after the facts by people who didn't witness anything. And nobody has been able to prove otherwise.Except with Christ they detailed all of the miracles he performed, his crucifixion and resurrection. It really did happen.Kids experience Santa every year and thinks he's real, WAY more than 24,000. Which makes you wrong. Again.Probably not. But in the case of Christ it wasn't one person copying it and it wasn't just one thing that was being copying.So if I copy the story of Santa Claus he becomes real?Sure it.
Of course the final test would be if you copied a story of Santa and tried experiencing him. Since Santa isn't real, you wouldn't be getting any presents. Christ is real, and if you seek him, you will get presents. Lots and lots of presents.
Christ is real and will give you lots of presents? What kind of messed up tree goes with that nonsense?
Carbon dating places the earliest fragment to several generations after the facts. Most of it is dated as even more recent. And even if you don't accept carbon dating, there's really no proof as to when the stories were written.No, not several generations. 25 years. History is recorded by people who witnessed it, Taz.Written by people several generations after the facts by people who didn't witness anything. And nobody has been able to prove otherwise.Except with Christ they detailed all of the miracles he performed, his crucifixion and resurrection. It really did happen.Kids experience Santa every year and thinks he's real, WAY more than 24,000. Which makes you wrong. Again.Probably not. But in the case of Christ it wasn't one person copying it and it wasn't just one thing that was being copying.So if I copy the story of Santa Claus he becomes real?
Of course the final test would be if you copied a story of Santa and tried experiencing him. Since Santa isn't real, you wouldn't be getting any presents. Christ is real, and if you seek him, you will get presents. Lots and lots of presents.
Christ is real and will give you lots of presents? What kind of messed up tree goes with that nonsense?
Were you expecting to be able to witness it 2000 years before you existed?
Can you disprove it?
Wrong.Carbon dating places the earliest fragment to several generations after the facts. Most of it is dated as even more recent. And even if you don't accept carbon dating, there's really no proof as to when the stories were written.No, not several generations. 25 years. History is recorded by people who witnessed it, Taz.Written by people several generations after the facts by people who didn't witness anything. And nobody has been able to prove otherwise.Except with Christ they detailed all of the miracles he performed, his crucifixion and resurrection. It really did happen.Kids experience Santa every year and thinks he's real, WAY more than 24,000. Which makes you wrong. Again.Probably not. But in the case of Christ it wasn't one person copying it and it wasn't just one thing that was being copying.
Of course the final test would be if you copied a story of Santa and tried experiencing him. Since Santa isn't real, you wouldn't be getting any presents. Christ is real, and if you seek him, you will get presents. Lots and lots of presents.
Christ is real and will give you lots of presents? What kind of messed up tree goes with that nonsense?
Were you expecting to be able to witness it 2000 years before you existed?
Can you disprove it?
Now disprove it didn't happen.Carbon dating places the earliest fragment to several generations after the facts. Most of it is dated as even more recent. And even if you don't accept carbon dating, there's really no proof as to when the stories were written.No, not several generations. 25 years. History is recorded by people who witnessed it, Taz.Written by people several generations after the facts by people who didn't witness anything. And nobody has been able to prove otherwise.Except with Christ they detailed all of the miracles he performed, his crucifixion and resurrection. It really did happen.Kids experience Santa every year and thinks he's real, WAY more than 24,000. Which makes you wrong. Again.Probably not. But in the case of Christ it wasn't one person copying it and it wasn't just one thing that was being copying.
Of course the final test would be if you copied a story of Santa and tried experiencing him. Since Santa isn't real, you wouldn't be getting any presents. Christ is real, and if you seek him, you will get presents. Lots and lots of presents.
Christ is real and will give you lots of presents? What kind of messed up tree goes with that nonsense?
Were you expecting to be able to witness it 2000 years before you existed?
Can you disprove it?
You still can’t prove anything. Too bad for you.Wrong.Carbon dating places the earliest fragment to several generations after the facts. Most of it is dated as even more recent. And even if you don't accept carbon dating, there's really no proof as to when the stories were written.No, not several generations. 25 years. History is recorded by people who witnessed it, Taz.Written by people several generations after the facts by people who didn't witness anything. And nobody has been able to prove otherwise.Except with Christ they detailed all of the miracles he performed, his crucifixion and resurrection. It really did happen.Kids experience Santa every year and thinks he's real, WAY more than 24,000. Which makes you wrong. Again.
Christ is real and will give you lots of presents? What kind of messed up tree goes with that nonsense?
Were you expecting to be able to witness it 2000 years before you existed?
Can you disprove it?
Dates established by radiocarbon dating can present a range of 10 to over 100 years. Similarly, dates established by paleography can present a range of 25 to over 125 years.[25]
Biblical manuscript - Wikipedia
The reality is that no other historical event in antiquity comes close in the number, accuracy or timing of the recordings, Taz. Deal with it.
Seriously? That old saw?Now disprove it didn't happen.Carbon dating places the earliest fragment to several generations after the facts. Most of it is dated as even more recent. And even if you don't accept carbon dating, there's really no proof as to when the stories were written.No, not several generations. 25 years. History is recorded by people who witnessed it, Taz.Written by people several generations after the facts by people who didn't witness anything. And nobody has been able to prove otherwise.Except with Christ they detailed all of the miracles he performed, his crucifixion and resurrection. It really did happen.Kids experience Santa every year and thinks he's real, WAY more than 24,000. Which makes you wrong. Again.
Christ is real and will give you lots of presents? What kind of messed up tree goes with that nonsense?
Were you expecting to be able to witness it 2000 years before you existed?
Can you disprove it?
Where is your proof!
Don't be silly. You are the one who has no proof that Jesus did not perform miracles, suffered death and was resurrected. I have 24,000 manuscripts that say he did.You still can’t prove anything. Too bad for you.Wrong.Carbon dating places the earliest fragment to several generations after the facts. Most of it is dated as even more recent. And even if you don't accept carbon dating, there's really no proof as to when the stories were written.No, not several generations. 25 years. History is recorded by people who witnessed it, Taz.Written by people several generations after the facts by people who didn't witness anything. And nobody has been able to prove otherwise.Except with Christ they detailed all of the miracles he performed, his crucifixion and resurrection. It really did happen.
Were you expecting to be able to witness it 2000 years before you existed?
Can you disprove it?
Dates established by radiocarbon dating can present a range of 10 to over 100 years. Similarly, dates established by paleography can present a range of 25 to over 125 years.[25]
Biblical manuscript - Wikipedia
The reality is that no other historical event in antiquity comes close in the number, accuracy or timing of the recordings, Taz. Deal with it.
Yes, because I have evidence. You have none.Seriously? That old saw?Now disprove it didn't happen.Carbon dating places the earliest fragment to several generations after the facts. Most of it is dated as even more recent. And even if you don't accept carbon dating, there's really no proof as to when the stories were written.No, not several generations. 25 years. History is recorded by people who witnessed it, Taz.Written by people several generations after the facts by people who didn't witness anything. And nobody has been able to prove otherwise.Except with Christ they detailed all of the miracles he performed, his crucifixion and resurrection. It really did happen.
Were you expecting to be able to witness it 2000 years before you existed?
Can you disprove it?
Where is your proof!
You have no proof Jesus wasn’t gay and blew all his disciples. We’re even.Don't be silly. You are the one who has no proof that Jesus did not perform miracles, suffered death and was resurrected. I have 24,000 manuscripts that say he did.You still can’t prove anything. Too bad for you.Wrong.Carbon dating places the earliest fragment to several generations after the facts. Most of it is dated as even more recent. And even if you don't accept carbon dating, there's really no proof as to when the stories were written.No, not several generations. 25 years. History is recorded by people who witnessed it, Taz.Written by people several generations after the facts by people who didn't witness anything. And nobody has been able to prove otherwise.
Were you expecting to be able to witness it 2000 years before you existed?
Can you disprove it?
Dates established by radiocarbon dating can present a range of 10 to over 100 years. Similarly, dates established by paleography can present a range of 25 to over 125 years.[25]
Biblical manuscript - Wikipedia
The reality is that no other historical event in antiquity comes close in the number, accuracy or timing of the recordings, Taz. Deal with it.
Do you have proof that he did?You have no proof Jesus wasn’t gay and blew all his disciples. We’re even.Don't be silly. You are the one who has no proof that Jesus did not perform miracles, suffered death and was resurrected. I have 24,000 manuscripts that say he did.You still can’t prove anything. Too bad for you.Wrong.Carbon dating places the earliest fragment to several generations after the facts. Most of it is dated as even more recent. And even if you don't accept carbon dating, there's really no proof as to when the stories were written.No, not several generations. 25 years. History is recorded by people who witnessed it, Taz.
Were you expecting to be able to witness it 2000 years before you existed?
Can you disprove it?
Dates established by radiocarbon dating can present a range of 10 to over 100 years. Similarly, dates established by paleography can present a range of 25 to over 125 years.[25]
Biblical manuscript - Wikipedia
The reality is that no other historical event in antiquity comes close in the number, accuracy or timing of the recordings, Taz. Deal with it.
You have hearsay just like I do.Do you have proof that he did?You have no proof Jesus wasn’t gay and blew all his disciples. We’re even.Don't be silly. You are the one who has no proof that Jesus did not perform miracles, suffered death and was resurrected. I have 24,000 manuscripts that say he did.You still can’t prove anything. Too bad for you.Wrong.Carbon dating places the earliest fragment to several generations after the facts. Most of it is dated as even more recent. And even if you don't accept carbon dating, there's really no proof as to when the stories were written.
Dates established by radiocarbon dating can present a range of 10 to over 100 years. Similarly, dates established by paleography can present a range of 25 to over 125 years.[25]
Biblical manuscript - Wikipedia
The reality is that no other historical event in antiquity comes close in the number, accuracy or timing of the recordings, Taz. Deal with it.
Because I have 24,000 manuscripts that were based upon eye witness accounts that he performed miracles and was resurrected from the dead.
No. I have written evidence from eye witnesses. Same exact thing that all ancient history is based upon.You have hearsay just like I do.Do you have proof that he did?You have no proof Jesus wasn’t gay and blew all his disciples. We’re even.Don't be silly. You are the one who has no proof that Jesus did not perform miracles, suffered death and was resurrected. I have 24,000 manuscripts that say he did.You still can’t prove anything. Too bad for you.Wrong.
Dates established by radiocarbon dating can present a range of 10 to over 100 years. Similarly, dates established by paleography can present a range of 25 to over 125 years.[25]
Biblical manuscript - Wikipedia
The reality is that no other historical event in antiquity comes close in the number, accuracy or timing of the recordings, Taz. Deal with it.
Because I have 24,000 manuscripts that were based upon eye witness accounts that he performed miracles and was resurrected from the dead.
You can’t prove that the writers witnessed anything.No. I have written evidence from eye witnesses. Same exact thing that all ancient history is based upon.You have hearsay just like I do.Do you have proof that he did?You have no proof Jesus wasn’t gay and blew all his disciples. We’re even.Don't be silly. You are the one who has no proof that Jesus did not perform miracles, suffered death and was resurrected. I have 24,000 manuscripts that say he did.You still can’t prove anything. Too bad for you.
Because I have 24,000 manuscripts that were based upon eye witness accounts that he performed miracles and was resurrected from the dead.
