Yet more data manipulation

Discussion in 'Environment' started by westwall, Jul 29, 2010.

  1. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    49,587
    Thanks Received:
    10,254
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +31,311
    NOAA just can't seem to do good science anymore. Hell even Phil Jones and company are being a tad more accurate these days.

    Global Temperature And Data Distortions Continue
     
  2. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    24,223
    Thanks Received:
    2,857
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +6,827
    Averaging temps is always problematic. That's why I look to GHG concentrations. If they continue to rise, warming is inevitable. It's the simple application of the Laws of Chemistry and Physics, in particular Conservation of Energy. If the gases absorb infra-red radiation and statistically only half would be re-emitted into space, where's the rest going, but to heat the earth? Why can't you answer that simple question?
     

Share This Page