Yes, There Was Collusion

[Norman]

Robert Mueller’s Six Cases for Collusion

Mueller details six separate incidences

He couldn't find "criminal conspiracy" but plenty of collusion

Oh... has there been any leftists who aren't occupying the cry closet or full of denial yet?

Spin, spin, spin.

It will be fun watching the Trumpslide 2020.

 

[SweetSue92]

They do seemed triggered

I'm not at all triggered, Lesh. I'm having a wonderful time picturing my newly elected Congress Critter begging Nancy P to please, please call off the dogs.

Man. Wish I could be a fly on the wall for all those convos. But it's fun to imagine it.

 

[Mac1958]

Well, we can all look at the bright side: All the wingers have a nice chew toy to keep playing with.

"Mac breathes rarefied air" Post 10,546 or something

No one cares, Mac

Don't need 'em to.

You do, obviously, so I really think you shouldn't read my posts any more.


.

 

[SweetSue92]

Robert Mueller’s Six Cases for Collusion

Mueller details six separate incidences

He couldn't find "criminal conspiracy" but plenty of collusion

You know it's crossed over to a religious faith now--Russian Collusion. We should really call it The Church of Russian Collusion.

We have a lot of zealots here among us too

These people make me laugh. They are trying to revive a dead horse, lol. It is pathetic to watch them, and this will be the last post in this thread by me. Let the FAAAAAAAAR Leftists have their own circle jerk-) We have better fish to fry, like policy, and the indictments coming down against their heroes!

I understand your perspective but I also like to challenge them on what EXACTLY they plan to do besides the circle jerk. Really? Impeachment?

Okay.

Let's do this thing. Great economy, jobs are back, yes indeed, the very thing America is hankering for after this entire Mueller thing bombed out is an IMPEACHMENT trial.

Do it Dems, DO IT

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Collusion is legal , you folks couldn't see this comming....?

~S~

This misses the point – no one said collusion was 'illegal.'

The voters will consider the merits of the Mueller report, not the courts, and act accordingly during the General Election next year.

The people have the right to remove a president from office through the political process – either via impeachment or at the ballot box – for whatever reason or reasons they see fit, including acts of collusion and obstruction.

 

[SweetSue92]

Well, we can all look at the bright side: All the wingers have a nice chew toy to keep playing with.

"Mac breathes rarefied air" Post 10,546 or something

No one cares, Mac

Don't need 'em to.

You do, obviously, so I really think you shouldn't read my posts any more.


.

No I'm just dead sick of your games. Yes, we know, you're better than everyone else.

HEY, EVERYONE. MAC IS BETTER THAN YOU BECAUSE HE'S NOT A WINGER

There.

 

[Mac1958]

Well, we can all look at the bright side: All the wingers have a nice chew toy to keep playing with.

"Mac breathes rarefied air" Post 10,546 or something

No one cares, Mac

Don't need 'em to.

You do, obviously, so I really think you shouldn't read my posts any more.


.

No I'm just dead sick of your games. Yes, we know, you're better than everyone else.

HEY, EVERYONE. MAC IS BETTER THAN YOU BECAUSE HE'S NOT A WINGER

There.

How nice! Thanks!
.

 

[SweetSue92]

Well, we can all look at the bright side: All the wingers have a nice chew toy to keep playing with.

"Mac breathes rarefied air" Post 10,546 or something

No one cares, Mac

Don't need 'em to.

You do, obviously, so I really think you shouldn't read my posts any more.


.

Next up in the childish repertoire: Mac will think I'm obsessed with him.

 

[Mac1958]

 

[Soupnazi630]

There’s also ample evidence of obstruction.

And ample evidence to compel the voters to remove Trump from office next year.

The Mueller report reaffirms the fact that Trump is unfit to hold office, and doesn’t deserve a second term.

Indeed, it’s the role and responsibility of the American people to hold Trump accountable, not that of the courts.

Indeed it is always up to the voters. He may win he may lose but that is irrelevant

However your fact is not a fact at all it is a narrow minded and bigoted opinion and nothing more.

He is factually fit to hold office under the constitution

Deserve has shit to do with it as no one DESERVES to be president

BTW there is no evidence of collusion or obstruction and you lied

 

[Norman]

Collusion is legal , you folks couldn't see this comming....?

~S~

This misses the point – no one said collusion was 'illegal.'

The voters will consider the merits of the Mueller report, not the courts, and act accordingly during the General Election next year.

The people have the right to remove a president from office through the political process – either via impeachmd.ent or at the ballot box – for whatever reason or reasons they see fit, including acts of collusion and obstruction.

The voters have already considered the report and found it to contain no evidence of collusion. This is because the voters can read.

Only you are still living in alternative facts world.

 

[Cellblock2429]

One major takeaway from the Mueller report is that Trump and those around him have a penchant for lies and misleading statements. Mueller’s report did not lay out a case for criminal conspiracy. But it did acknowledge that he may have been able to, had Trump campaign officials been up front. “Even when individuals testified or agreed to be interviewed, they sometimes provided information that was false or incomplete,” he wrote. After all, Manafort’s cooperation deal fell apart thanks to his obfuscations and misleading statements. Of Manafort, Mueller concedes he was unable to gain access to all of the longtime political operative’s communications. “While Manafort denied that he spoke to members of the Trump Campaign or the new administration about the peace plan and his meetings with Kilimnik,” he wrote, “his unreliability on this subject was among the reasons that the district judge found that he breached his cooperation agreement.”

Mueller also noted that he was hindered by campaign officials who “deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long-term retention of data or communications records.” For instance, Mueller came up empty-handed in determining the purpose of a clandestine meeting between Erik Prince and Kirill Dmitriev, the head of a Russian sovereign wealth fund, in Seychelles during the presidential transition, because both Prince and Steve Bannon were unable to produce records of their discussions around the meeting. Similarly, Mueller’s inability to determine whether Papadopoulos told other members of the Trump campaign about Mifsud’s scoop on the Russians having “dirt” on Clinton came down to Papadopoulos not being able to “clearly recall having told anyone.” Campaign officials who “interacted or corresponded with” Papadopoulos told Mueller, with “varying degrees of certainty, that he did not tell them.”

If everyone he spoke with had cooperated to the extent Barr claimed, Mueller may have been able to prove a conspiracy. Mueller himself suggested this when he wrote that he “cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report.”

/——-/ “But it did acknowledge that he may have been able to,”
I acknowledge you may have been able to rob the 7/11 this morning. That makes you guilty as sin. Turn yourself in to the police.

 

[SweetSue92]

Mac, you have decent things to say when you're not sitting up on the mountain calling down this side and that side. Anyway.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

View attachment 256876

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

One major takeaway from the Mueller report is that Trump and those around him have a penchant for lies and misleading statements. Mueller’s report did not lay out a case for criminal conspiracy. But it did acknowledge that he may have been able to, had Trump campaign officials been up front. “Even when individuals testified or agreed to be interviewed, they sometimes provided information that was false or incomplete,” he wrote. After all, Manafort’s cooperation deal fell apart thanks to his obfuscations and misleading statements. Of Manafort, Mueller concedes he was unable to gain access to all of the longtime political operative’s communications. “While Manafort denied that he spoke to members of the Trump Campaign or the new administration about the peace plan and his meetings with Kilimnik,” he wrote, “his unreliability on this subject was among the reasons that the district judge found that he breached his cooperation agreement.”

Mueller also noted that he was hindered by campaign officials who “deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long-term retention of data or communications records.” For instance, Mueller came up empty-handed in determining the purpose of a clandestine meeting between Erik Prince and Kirill Dmitriev, the head of a Russian sovereign wealth fund, in Seychelles during the presidential transition, because both Prince and Steve Bannon were unable to produce records of their discussions around the meeting. Similarly, Mueller’s inability to determine whether Papadopoulos told other members of the Trump campaign about Mifsud’s scoop on the Russians having “dirt” on Clinton came down to Papadopoulos not being able to “clearly recall having told anyone.” Campaign officials who “interacted or corresponded with” Papadopoulos told Mueller, with “varying degrees of certainty, that he did not tell them.”

If everyone he spoke with had cooperated to the extent Barr claimed, Mueller may have been able to prove a conspiracy. Mueller himself suggested this when he wrote that he “cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report.”

/——-/ “But it did acknowledge that he may have been able to,”
I acknowledge you may have been able to rob the 7/11 this morning. That makes you guilty as sin. Turn yourself in to the police.

But but but....:

Uh oh WHAT is THIS?

 

[gipper]

Robert Mueller’s Six Cases for Collusion
Mueller details six separate incidences

He couldn't find "criminal conspiracy" but plenty of collusion

This is so lame. Let me ask you: If these cases constitute "Russian collusion," what do you call Hillary's hiring of Fusion GPS to have an ex-spy get with the Russians to try to get dirt on Trump? What do you call THAT?

He doesn’t know what you are talking about. His media sources have lied to him.

 

[SweetSue92]

Robert Mueller’s Six Cases for Collusion

Mueller details six separate incidences

He couldn't find "criminal conspiracy" but plenty of collusion

So Lesh, come back and tell us what should be DONE about it. WHAT, exactly?

Or do you just plan to whine every day he's in office? Because that's nothing new. Bunch of whiners

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Robert Mueller’s Six Cases for Collusion

Mueller details six separate incidences

He couldn't find "criminal conspiracy" but plenty of collusion

You know it's crossed over to a religious faith now--Russian Collusion. We should really call it The Church of Russian Collusion.

We have a lot of zealots here among us too

These people make me laugh. They are trying to revive a dead horse, lol. It is pathetic to watch them, and this will be the last post in this thread by me. Let the FAAAAAAAAR Leftists have their own circle jerk-) We have better fish to fry, like policy, and the indictments coming down against their heroes!

I understand your perspective but I also like to challenge them on what EXACTLY they plan to do besides the circle jerk. Really? Impeachment?

Okay.

Let's do this thing. Great economy, jobs are back, yes indeed, the very thing America is hankering for after this entire Mueller thing bombed out is an IMPEACHMENT trial.

Do it Dems, DO IT

But but but Professor Maxine Waters her Degree in Advanced Moonbat is saying:

OMG THINK of the CHILDREN:

 

[Daryl Hunt]

If anyone wants a dose of reality, fact, and reason, here is an analysis of the Mueller report published by The Federalist:

7 Ways The Mueller Report Exposed The Media’s Fake ‘Bombshell’ Stories

Instead of reading party hack information how about reading the real redacted Mueller Report.

 

[SweetSue92]

If anyone wants a dose of reality, fact, and reason, here is an analysis of the Mueller report published by The Federalist:

7 Ways The Mueller Report Exposed The Media’s Fake ‘Bombshell’ Stories

Instead of reading party hack information how about reading the real redacted Mueller Report.

Daryl what are you going to DO about it?

Just whine some more?

Impeach?

WHAT?