- Thread starter
- #61
It all boils down to one thing... obama is a died in the wool, filthy, socialist/commie, and it's no more complicated than that.
Now the libtards know this and don't think they don't. They just HATE to be EXPOSED. They know that if their TRUE COLORS are exposed to the majority of Americans, they can kiss any reelection chances they might have had of their little shit bag commie in chief goodbye.
Pure and simple.
In chapter two of "To Save America," Gingrich said roughly the same thing...
1. Describing the Left as socialist is controversial because the Left hates accurate language about their goals.
2. Socialist policies favor increased central planning of the economy by politicians and by bureaucrats, instead of allowing entrepreneurs, businesses, and customers to make decisions in a free market. Socialists also favor government attempts to collectivize the means of production and to divvy up the national wealth. The reason: because they insist on equality of results, as opposed to the traditional American belief in equality under the law.
a. Obama: "I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."
3. If youre a secular socialist, you generally have to maintain your power in ways that the public inherently dislikes: paying off supporters by putting earmarks in appropriations bills, writing bills in collusion with lobbyists, making special deals to get enough votes to pass legislation, and appointing really bizarre nominees to top government jobs. Basically, you have to hide what you intend to do, and what your real goals are.
4. And the singular hallmark of the movement that believes it knows better than the American public what is best for them, is the scorn for the values and traditions of the people you intend to change.
a. Since misleading the public into voting for them is of the essence, having control and acquiescence of the media is of enormous value.