Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
To live in denial and closed mind is worst than thinking , the 19 Muslim hijackers makes no sense on a road to nowhere, oh wait that's why we went to war with Iraq, what was I thinking. !!!!!!!!!
Penelope----you have,, AGAIN, said nothing. "it makes no sense"------
----"makes no sense"??? why not? It is because it is so
consistent with Islamic custom and ideology YOUR reason that it
"makes no sense"? Or have you been told----"just describe those
the Islamic ideology and history and tell your audience "it makes no
sense" -------you will always be right because islam does not make
sense to the minds of educated americans
To live in denial and closed mind is worst than thinking , the 19 Muslim hijackers makes no sense on a road to nowhere, oh wait that's why we went to war with Iraq, what was I thinking. !!!!!!!!!
how about because I did not see the FIRST PLANE hit--------but I saw the second?
right there----from my living room window------then I watched the buildings BURN---
for a really long time-------I did not time it-----GIANT BILLOWS of white smoke
rising to the sky----------for at the very least 45 minutes------then they collapsed---
one after the other I have seen contolled demolitions-----they do not involve
planes------nor prolonged burning-----they are BANG!!>collapse----from the bottom bang/smoke. not from the TOP then----later..smoke at the bottom.
gee you are dim
Penelope----you have,, AGAIN, said nothing. "it makes no sense"------
----"makes no sense"??? why not? It is because it is so
consistent with Islamic custom and ideology YOUR reason that it
"makes no sense"? Or have you been told----"just describe those
the Islamic ideology and history and tell your audience "it makes no
sense" -------you will always be right because islam does not make
sense to the minds of educated americans
This is truly what it gets down to, the battle for hearts & minds,
given an airliner crash that most closely resembles "B movie special effects"
+ three steel framed skyscrapers completely destroyed ( as in controlled demolition )
WHY should anyone still embrace the fairy tale about 19 suicidal Arabs?
bullshit,"GIANT BILLOWS of white smoke .... rising to the sky- "
and white smoke is indicative of THERMITE at work.
also, exactly how long did you get to view "FLT175"
was it a second, more or less or maybe 2 or 3 seconds?
really, how long does it take to acquire a visual on a target and positively ID it?
"GIANT BILLOWS of white smoke .... rising to the sky- "
and white smoke is indicative of THERMITE at work.
also, exactly how long did you get to view "FLT175"
was it a second, more or less or maybe 2 or 3 seconds?
really, how long does it take to acquire a visual on a target and positively ID it?
he ignored the fact that lots of burning material make white smoke.."GIANT BILLOWS of white smoke .... rising to the sky- "
and white smoke is indicative of THERMITE at work.
also, exactly how long did you get to view "FLT175"
was it a second, more or less or maybe 2 or 3 seconds?
really, how long does it take to acquire a visual on a target and positively ID it?
Then why wasn't a single thermite reaction ever observed? Thermite reactions are so insanely, ludicrously obvious they are used in fire works. You can permenantly damage your eyes by looking directly at one. Once ignited, thermite can't be put out. It provides its own oxygen. And your theory requires thousands upon thousands of such reactions. If we include WTC 1 and 2, tens of thousands, with about about 80% of them on the OUTSIDE of the building.
Yet, nothing. Not one such reaction ever observed, not one cut on any girder ever found. Not one. And your theory requires tens of thousands of them. How do you resolve these obtuse contradiction between the 'thermite' theory and reality? You pretend it doesn't exist. But why would we ignore what you do?
There is no reason. Ending your conspiracy yet again.
he ignored the fact that lots of burning material make white smoke.."GIANT BILLOWS of white smoke .... rising to the sky- "
and white smoke is indicative of THERMITE at work.
also, exactly how long did you get to view "FLT175"
was it a second, more or less or maybe 2 or 3 seconds?
really, how long does it take to acquire a visual on a target and positively ID it?
Then why wasn't a single thermite reaction ever observed? Thermite reactions are so insanely, ludicrously obvious they are used in fire works. You can permenantly damage your eyes by looking directly at one. Once ignited, thermite can't be put out. It provides its own oxygen. And your theory requires thousands upon thousands of such reactions. If we include WTC 1 and 2, tens of thousands, with about about 80% of them on the OUTSIDE of the building.
Yet, nothing. Not one such reaction ever observed, not one cut on any girder ever found. Not one. And your theory requires tens of thousands of them. How do you resolve these obtuse contradiction between the 'thermite' theory and reality? You pretend it doesn't exist. But why would we ignore what you do?
There is no reason. Ending your conspiracy yet again.
he ignored the fact that lots of burning material make white smoke.."GIANT BILLOWS of white smoke .... rising to the sky- "
and white smoke is indicative of THERMITE at work.
also, exactly how long did you get to view "FLT175"
was it a second, more or less or maybe 2 or 3 seconds?
really, how long does it take to acquire a visual on a target and positively ID it?
Then why wasn't a single thermite reaction ever observed? Thermite reactions are so insanely, ludicrously obvious they are used in fire works. You can permenantly damage your eyes by looking directly at one. Once ignited, thermite can't be put out. It provides its own oxygen. And your theory requires thousands upon thousands of such reactions. If we include WTC 1 and 2, tens of thousands, with about about 80% of them on the OUTSIDE of the building.
Yet, nothing. Not one such reaction ever observed, not one cut on any girder ever found. Not one. And your theory requires tens of thousands of them. How do you resolve these obtuse contradiction between the 'thermite' theory and reality? You pretend it doesn't exist. But why would we ignore what you do?
There is no reason. Ending your conspiracy yet again.
And the fact that there wasn't a single thermite reaction observed on 911. Despite his theory requiring tens of thousands of them.
That's the problem I have with most truthers: they won't question their own bullshit. They won't think too hard about it. And when presented with theory killing holes in their own beliefs, they double down on cognitive dissonance and simply pretend that no such contradiction ever existed.
So they have mindless belief in a conspiracy for which no evidence exists and overwhelming evidence contradicts. And a refusal to ask any question or even think about the truther conspiracy they are apeing.
That take a special kind of gullible.
false the other energy was in the towers themselves What Is a Joule with pictureshe ignored the fact that lots of burning material make white smoke.."GIANT BILLOWS of white smoke .... rising to the sky- "
and white smoke is indicative of THERMITE at work.
also, exactly how long did you get to view "FLT175"
was it a second, more or less or maybe 2 or 3 seconds?
really, how long does it take to acquire a visual on a target and positively ID it?
Then why wasn't a single thermite reaction ever observed? Thermite reactions are so insanely, ludicrously obvious they are used in fire works. You can permenantly damage your eyes by looking directly at one. Once ignited, thermite can't be put out. It provides its own oxygen. And your theory requires thousands upon thousands of such reactions. If we include WTC 1 and 2, tens of thousands, with about about 80% of them on the OUTSIDE of the building.
Yet, nothing. Not one such reaction ever observed, not one cut on any girder ever found. Not one. And your theory requires tens of thousands of them. How do you resolve these obtuse contradiction between the 'thermite' theory and reality? You pretend it doesn't exist. But why would we ignore what you do?
There is no reason. Ending your conspiracy yet again.
And the fact that there wasn't a single thermite reaction observed on 911. Despite his theory requiring tens of thousands of them.
That's the problem I have with most truthers: they won't question their own bullshit. They won't think too hard about it. And when presented with theory killing holes in their own beliefs, they double down on cognitive dissonance and simply pretend that no such contradiction ever existed.
So they have mindless belief in a conspiracy for which no evidence exists and overwhelming evidence contradicts. And a refusal to ask any question or even think about the truther conspiracy they are apeing.
That take a special kind of gullible.
There was something emitting sparks and dripping from a corner of one of the towers right before its "collapse".
however, with or without THERMITE or any other named accelerant or incendiary/explosive, the fact remains that in order to do what was seen on that day, that is the total destruction of WTC1, 2 & 7, there would have to be some additional source of energy other than simply aircraft crash & fire. In order to achieve what was done in 9/11/2001 for both towers, ALL of the internal connections would have to fail exactly on time as if to a schedule.
the sparks you are yammering about were actually melted bits of anything made of plastic that were pushed into a huge pile and like all liquids will will dripfalse the other energy was in the towers themselves What Is a Joule with pictureshe ignored the fact that lots of burning material make white smoke.."GIANT BILLOWS of white smoke .... rising to the sky- "
and white smoke is indicative of THERMITE at work.
also, exactly how long did you get to view "FLT175"
was it a second, more or less or maybe 2 or 3 seconds?
really, how long does it take to acquire a visual on a target and positively ID it?
Then why wasn't a single thermite reaction ever observed? Thermite reactions are so insanely, ludicrously obvious they are used in fire works. You can permenantly damage your eyes by looking directly at one. Once ignited, thermite can't be put out. It provides its own oxygen. And your theory requires thousands upon thousands of such reactions. If we include WTC 1 and 2, tens of thousands, with about about 80% of them on the OUTSIDE of the building.
Yet, nothing. Not one such reaction ever observed, not one cut on any girder ever found. Not one. And your theory requires tens of thousands of them. How do you resolve these obtuse contradiction between the 'thermite' theory and reality? You pretend it doesn't exist. But why would we ignore what you do?
There is no reason. Ending your conspiracy yet again.
And the fact that there wasn't a single thermite reaction observed on 911. Despite his theory requiring tens of thousands of them.
That's the problem I have with most truthers: they won't question their own bullshit. They won't think too hard about it. And when presented with theory killing holes in their own beliefs, they double down on cognitive dissonance and simply pretend that no such contradiction ever existed.
So they have mindless belief in a conspiracy for which no evidence exists and overwhelming evidence contradicts. And a refusal to ask any question or even think about the truther conspiracy they are apeing.
That take a special kind of gullible.
There was something emitting sparks and dripping from a corner of one of the towers right before its "collapse".
however, with or without THERMITE or any other named accelerant or incendiary/explosive, the fact remains that in order to do what was seen on that day, that is the total destruction of WTC1, 2 & 7, there would have to be some additional source of energy other than simply aircraft crash & fire. In order to achieve what was done in 9/11/2001 for both towers, ALL of the internal connections would have to fail exactly on time as if to a schedule.
There was something emitting sparks and dripping from a corner of one of the towers right before its "collapse".
he ignored the fact that lots of burning material make white smoke.."GIANT BILLOWS of white smoke .... rising to the sky- "
and white smoke is indicative of THERMITE at work.
also, exactly how long did you get to view "FLT175"
was it a second, more or less or maybe 2 or 3 seconds?
really, how long does it take to acquire a visual on a target and positively ID it?
Then why wasn't a single thermite reaction ever observed? Thermite reactions are so insanely, ludicrously obvious they are used in fire works. You can permenantly damage your eyes by looking directly at one. Once ignited, thermite can't be put out. It provides its own oxygen. And your theory requires thousands upon thousands of such reactions. If we include WTC 1 and 2, tens of thousands, with about about 80% of them on the OUTSIDE of the building.
Yet, nothing. Not one such reaction ever observed, not one cut on any girder ever found. Not one. And your theory requires tens of thousands of them. How do you resolve these obtuse contradiction between the 'thermite' theory and reality? You pretend it doesn't exist. But why would we ignore what you do?
There is no reason. Ending your conspiracy yet again.
And the fact that there wasn't a single thermite reaction observed on 911. Despite his theory requiring tens of thousands of them.
That's the problem I have with most truthers: they won't question their own bullshit. They won't think too hard about it. And when presented with theory killing holes in their own beliefs, they double down on cognitive dissonance and simply pretend that no such contradiction ever existed.
So they have mindless belief in a conspiracy for which no evidence exists and overwhelming evidence contradicts. And a refusal to ask any question or even think about the truther conspiracy they are apeing.
That take a special kind of gullible.
There was something emitting sparks and dripping from a corner of one of the towers right before its "collapse".
however, with or without THERMITE or any other named accelerant or incendiary/explosive, the fact remains that in order to do what was seen on that day, that is the total destruction of WTC1, 2 & 7, there would have to be some additional source of energy other than simply aircraft crash & fire. In order to achieve what was done in 9/11/2001 for both towers, ALL of the internal connections would have to fail exactly on time as if to a schedule.
he ignored the fact that lots of burning material make white smoke.."GIANT BILLOWS of white smoke .... rising to the sky- "
and white smoke is indicative of THERMITE at work.
also, exactly how long did you get to view "FLT175"
was it a second, more or less or maybe 2 or 3 seconds?
really, how long does it take to acquire a visual on a target and positively ID it?
Then why wasn't a single thermite reaction ever observed? Thermite reactions are so insanely, ludicrously obvious they are used in fire works. You can permenantly damage your eyes by looking directly at one. Once ignited, thermite can't be put out. It provides its own oxygen. And your theory requires thousands upon thousands of such reactions. If we include WTC 1 and 2, tens of thousands, with about about 80% of them on the OUTSIDE of the building.
Yet, nothing. Not one such reaction ever observed, not one cut on any girder ever found. Not one. And your theory requires tens of thousands of them. How do you resolve these obtuse contradiction between the 'thermite' theory and reality? You pretend it doesn't exist. But why would we ignore what you do?
There is no reason. Ending your conspiracy yet again.
And the fact that there wasn't a single thermite reaction observed on 911. Despite his theory requiring tens of thousands of them.
That's the problem I have with most truthers: they won't question their own bullshit. They won't think too hard about it. And when presented with theory killing holes in their own beliefs, they double down on cognitive dissonance and simply pretend that no such contradiction ever existed.
So they have mindless belief in a conspiracy for which no evidence exists and overwhelming evidence contradicts. And a refusal to ask any question or even think about the truther conspiracy they are apeing.
That take a special kind of gullible.
There was something emitting sparks and dripping from a corner of one of the towers right before its "collapse".
however, with or without THERMITE or any other named accelerant or incendiary/explosive, the fact remains that in order to do what was seen on that day, that is the total destruction of WTC1, 2 & 7, there would have to be some additional source of energy other than simply aircraft crash & fire. In order to achieve what was done in 9/11/2001 for both towers, ALL of the internal connections would have to fail exactly on time as if to a schedule.
Not so fast.
Your entire premise - that 9/11 was a controlled CT - REQUIRES some sort of explosive yet you consistently fail to provide any proof of their existence because - drum roll, please - there is none!
Case closed ... again.
he ignored the fact that lots of burning material make white smoke..Then why wasn't a single thermite reaction ever observed? Thermite reactions are so insanely, ludicrously obvious they are used in fire works. You can permenantly damage your eyes by looking directly at one. Once ignited, thermite can't be put out. It provides its own oxygen. And your theory requires thousands upon thousands of such reactions. If we include WTC 1 and 2, tens of thousands, with about about 80% of them on the OUTSIDE of the building.
Yet, nothing. Not one such reaction ever observed, not one cut on any girder ever found. Not one. And your theory requires tens of thousands of them. How do you resolve these obtuse contradiction between the 'thermite' theory and reality? You pretend it doesn't exist. But why would we ignore what you do?
There is no reason. Ending your conspiracy yet again.
And the fact that there wasn't a single thermite reaction observed on 911. Despite his theory requiring tens of thousands of them.
That's the problem I have with most truthers: they won't question their own bullshit. They won't think too hard about it. And when presented with theory killing holes in their own beliefs, they double down on cognitive dissonance and simply pretend that no such contradiction ever existed.
So they have mindless belief in a conspiracy for which no evidence exists and overwhelming evidence contradicts. And a refusal to ask any question or even think about the truther conspiracy they are apeing.
That take a special kind of gullible.
There was something emitting sparks and dripping from a corner of one of the towers right before its "collapse".
however, with or without THERMITE or any other named accelerant or incendiary/explosive, the fact remains that in order to do what was seen on that day, that is the total destruction of WTC1, 2 & 7, there would have to be some additional source of energy other than simply aircraft crash & fire. In order to achieve what was done in 9/11/2001 for both towers, ALL of the internal connections would have to fail exactly on time as if to a schedule.
Not so fast.
Your entire premise - that 9/11 was a controlled CT - REQUIRES some sort of explosive yet you consistently fail to provide any proof of their existence because - drum roll, please - there is none!
Case closed ... again.
So the action observed as the towers & 7 "collapsed" isn't sufficient evidence to make the statement that all three were controlled demolitions(?) at least to you..... however to many of us who understand not only the basic physics problem here but the one of probability of the events happening exactly as they did.
The taxpayer funded report on the towers shows clearly the level of fraud involved here
the statement "total collapse was inevitable after collapse initiation" is totally mad! There are a multitude of alternatives that could have happened and indeed what is the most probable alternative?
he ignored the fact that lots of burning material make white smoke..
And the fact that there wasn't a single thermite reaction observed on 911. Despite his theory requiring tens of thousands of them.
That's the problem I have with most truthers: they won't question their own bullshit. They won't think too hard about it. And when presented with theory killing holes in their own beliefs, they double down on cognitive dissonance and simply pretend that no such contradiction ever existed.
So they have mindless belief in a conspiracy for which no evidence exists and overwhelming evidence contradicts. And a refusal to ask any question or even think about the truther conspiracy they are apeing.
That take a special kind of gullible.
There was something emitting sparks and dripping from a corner of one of the towers right before its "collapse".
however, with or without THERMITE or any other named accelerant or incendiary/explosive, the fact remains that in order to do what was seen on that day, that is the total destruction of WTC1, 2 & 7, there would have to be some additional source of energy other than simply aircraft crash & fire. In order to achieve what was done in 9/11/2001 for both towers, ALL of the internal connections would have to fail exactly on time as if to a schedule.
Not so fast.
Your entire premise - that 9/11 was a controlled CT - REQUIRES some sort of explosive yet you consistently fail to provide any proof of their existence because - drum roll, please - there is none!
Case closed ... again.
So the action observed as the towers & 7 "collapsed" isn't sufficient evidence to make the statement that all three were controlled demolitions(?) at least to you..... however to many of us who understand not only the basic physics problem here but the one of probability of the events happening exactly as they did.
The taxpayer funded report on the towers shows clearly the level of fraud involved here
the statement "total collapse was inevitable after collapse initiation" is totally mad! There are a multitude of alternatives that could have happened and indeed what is the most probable alternative?
All the conspiracies have been debunked online, in books and a number of documentaries. Experts explaining in detail what could and could not happen.
And the fact that there wasn't a single thermite reaction observed on 911. Despite his theory requiring tens of thousands of them.
That's the problem I have with most truthers: they won't question their own bullshit. They won't think too hard about it. And when presented with theory killing holes in their own beliefs, they double down on cognitive dissonance and simply pretend that no such contradiction ever existed.
So they have mindless belief in a conspiracy for which no evidence exists and overwhelming evidence contradicts. And a refusal to ask any question or even think about the truther conspiracy they are apeing.
That take a special kind of gullible.
There was something emitting sparks and dripping from a corner of one of the towers right before its "collapse".
however, with or without THERMITE or any other named accelerant or incendiary/explosive, the fact remains that in order to do what was seen on that day, that is the total destruction of WTC1, 2 & 7, there would have to be some additional source of energy other than simply aircraft crash & fire. In order to achieve what was done in 9/11/2001 for both towers, ALL of the internal connections would have to fail exactly on time as if to a schedule.
Not so fast.
Your entire premise - that 9/11 was a controlled CT - REQUIRES some sort of explosive yet you consistently fail to provide any proof of their existence because - drum roll, please - there is none!
Case closed ... again.
So the action observed as the towers & 7 "collapsed" isn't sufficient evidence to make the statement that all three were controlled demolitions(?) at least to you..... however to many of us who understand not only the basic physics problem here but the one of probability of the events happening exactly as they did.
The taxpayer funded report on the towers shows clearly the level of fraud involved here
the statement "total collapse was inevitable after collapse initiation" is totally mad! There are a multitude of alternatives that could have happened and indeed what is the most probable alternative?
All the conspiracies have been debunked online, in books and a number of documentaries. Experts explaining in detail what could and could not happen.
Has anyone bothered to examine the fundamental physics involved in these explanations and ask if said explanations ring true? In the "documentaries" by the History channel, the Discovery channel, Popular Mechanics ( etc.... ) there are huge mistakes or possibly intentional fraud published as if it was the most perfect thing possible. REALLY people?
A scene with a single steel beam supported at the ends and loaded and then heated as a demonstration of the alleged failure mode of the steel in the WTC towers, ignoring completely the fact that in order to produce the result that happened with the towers, the steel would have to have been heated up by more fire than was possible, because many office fires have happened in skyscrapers before and burned for much longer, however no structural failure happened. What magic brought about not only structural failure, but in a manner that resulted in the total destruction of both towers?
and that is but one failure of the "documentaries" to properly explain WHY things happened as they did on 9/11/2001.
There was something emitting sparks and dripping from a corner of one of the towers right before its "collapse".
however, with or without THERMITE or any other named accelerant or incendiary/explosive, the fact remains that in order to do what was seen on that day, that is the total destruction of WTC1, 2 & 7, there would have to be some additional source of energy other than simply aircraft crash & fire. In order to achieve what was done in 9/11/2001 for both towers, ALL of the internal connections would have to fail exactly on time as if to a schedule.
Not so fast.
Your entire premise - that 9/11 was a controlled CT - REQUIRES some sort of explosive yet you consistently fail to provide any proof of their existence because - drum roll, please - there is none!
Case closed ... again.
So the action observed as the towers & 7 "collapsed" isn't sufficient evidence to make the statement that all three were controlled demolitions(?) at least to you..... however to many of us who understand not only the basic physics problem here but the one of probability of the events happening exactly as they did.
The taxpayer funded report on the towers shows clearly the level of fraud involved here
the statement "total collapse was inevitable after collapse initiation" is totally mad! There are a multitude of alternatives that could have happened and indeed what is the most probable alternative?
All the conspiracies have been debunked online, in books and a number of documentaries. Experts explaining in detail what could and could not happen.
Has anyone bothered to examine the fundamental physics involved in these explanations and ask if said explanations ring true? In the "documentaries" by the History channel, the Discovery channel, Popular Mechanics ( etc.... ) there are huge mistakes or possibly intentional fraud published as if it was the most perfect thing possible. REALLY people?
A scene with a single steel beam supported at the ends and loaded and then heated as a demonstration of the alleged failure mode of the steel in the WTC towers, ignoring completely the fact that in order to produce the result that happened with the towers, the steel would have to have been heated up by more fire than was possible, because many office fires have happened in skyscrapers before and burned for much longer, however no structural failure happened. What magic brought about not only structural failure, but in a manner that resulted in the total destruction of both towers?
and that is but one failure of the "documentaries" to properly explain WHY things happened as they did on 9/11/2001.
Metal did not have melt just be heated enough to weaken it, the stress from the impact and weight of the building was sufficient. Experts from all fields have weighed in on the topic.
The hijackers were identified as well as those who planned the attacks on 9/11.
Thirteen years later and people are still spreading conspiracy theories?
