WSJ: Prosecutors have evidence Trump personally involved in paying off mistresses

[AZGAL]

Trump has so many defenses against this and these news outlets are just dredging up old boring useless stories, yawn.

 

[fncceo]

Mad respect for a man who pays his debts.

 

[007]

Trump is fat, stupid, racist, xenophobic, a mega-liar, misogynistic, threatens people, cons millions, openly craves his eldest daughter, breaks marital vows with reckless abandon, inherited almost everything he got (but lies about it), ducked the draft (yet insults vets simply for being captured), is lousy at business (multiple bankruptcies and failed companies) and is incredibly self-centred.

Is there ANYTHING admirable about this pathetic loser?

Geee... do you think you could appear any more TRIGGERED if you tried?

What a pathetic moron....................

 

[McRocket]

'President Trump directed or was personally involved in multiple payments of hush money to women claiming to have had sexual encounters with him — potentially breaking campaign finance laws, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Why it matters: We’re now starting to get a picture of what Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, tabloid exec David Pecker and former Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg have been telling federal prosecutors, Axios' Jonathan Swan says.

What to know: New York City federal prosecutors wrote up an 80-page draft indictment in August to be used against Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen, which outlined Cohen's coordination with undisclosed Trump campaign members via phone calls and meetings about the payments to women claiming sexual relationships. Sources familiar with the document told the Wall Street Journal that the unnamed campaign member was Trump himself.

How he did it:

• In 2015, Trump asked American Media CEO Pecker to help him with his campaign. Pecker offered to use the National Enquirer to silence women who claim to have had sexual relationships with Trump, according to WSJ. He eventually paid $150,000 to model Karen McDougal, who claimed to have had an affair with Trump years before.
• Cohen has also reportedly told prosecutors that he discussed with Trump the payments to former porn star Stormy Daniels in the weeks leading up to it, and how to ensure it could not be traced back to the then-presidential candidate.

The bottom line: In order to be guilty of federal campaign finance crimes, Trump would have had to used more than $2,700 worth of campaign contributions from companies or individuals in these payments, Richard Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, told WSJ.'

WSJ: Prosecutors have evidence Trump personally involved in paying off mistresses

Interesting.

Trumpbots...start your spinning.

Why on earth should i care about Trumps mistresses?

I dunno.

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

You wouldnt have made a thread about it on an online message site if you didnt care about what other people thought.

Your reading skills seem none too good.

I did not say I did or did not care about what you thought.

I simply asked: Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

And you still have not answered me.

If that's the case, then your basically just repeating my question, which isnt a very effective tactic for winning a debate.

You are trying to 'win a debate'? Okaaaay.

I have near-zero interest in debating with you.

I am simply asking you a question for the third time (which you have yet to answer):

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

 

[Godboy]

Why on earth should i care about Trumps mistresses?

I dunno.

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

You wouldnt have made a thread about it on an online message site if you didnt care about what other people thought.

Your reading skills seem none too good.

I did not say I did or did not care about what you thought.

I simply asked: Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

And you still have not answered me.

If that's the case, then your basically just repeating my question, which isnt a very effective tactic for winning a debate.

You are trying to 'win a debate'? Okaaaay.

I have near-zero interest in debating with you.

I am simply asking you a question for the third time (which you have yet to answer):

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

Why would you ask a question in response to my question? Why didnt you answer it like a normal person?

 

[McRocket]

I dunno.

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

You wouldnt have made a thread about it on an online message site if you didnt care about what other people thought.

Your reading skills seem none too good.

I did not say I did or did not care about what you thought.

I simply asked: Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

And you still have not answered me.

If that's the case, then your basically just repeating my question, which isnt a very effective tactic for winning a debate.

You are trying to 'win a debate'? Okaaaay.

I have near-zero interest in debating with you.

I am simply asking you a question for the third time (which you have yet to answer):

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

Why would you ask a question in response to my question? Why didnt you answer it like a normal person?

What is it with you and reading comprehension?

I did answer your question. I said 'I dunno'. That means - 'I do not know'.

Now for the fourth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

 

[Godboy]

You wouldnt have made a thread about it on an online message site if you didnt care about what other people thought.

Your reading skills seem none too good.

I did not say I did or did not care about what you thought.

I simply asked: Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

And you still have not answered me.

If that's the case, then your basically just repeating my question, which isnt a very effective tactic for winning a debate.

You are trying to 'win a debate'? Okaaaay.

I have near-zero interest in debating with you.

I am simply asking you a question for the third time (which you have yet to answer):

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

Why would you ask a question in response to my question? Why didnt you answer it like a normal person?

What is it with you and reading comprehension?

I did answer your question. I said 'I dunno'. That means - 'I do not know'.

Now for the fourth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

"I dunno" isnt an honest answer. Why cant you just be honest?

 

[McRocket]

Your reading skills seem none too good.

I did not say I did or did not care about what you thought.

I simply asked: Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

And you still have not answered me.

If that's the case, then your basically just repeating my question, which isnt a very effective tactic for winning a debate.

You are trying to 'win a debate'? Okaaaay.

I have near-zero interest in debating with you.

I am simply asking you a question for the third time (which you have yet to answer):

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

Why would you ask a question in response to my question? Why didnt you answer it like a normal person?

What is it with you and reading comprehension?

I did answer your question. I said 'I dunno'. That means - 'I do not know'.

Now for the fourth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

"I dunno" isnt an honest answer. Why cant you just be honest?

Are you mental or something? Of course it's 'honest'.

You typed: 'Why on earth should i care about Trumps mistresses?'
To which I answered: 'I dunno'
I do not know you personally. I don't know what interests you. How the hell would I know why you should care or not care about Trump's mistresses? Jeez!!!

I have answered several of your inane questions...yet you have not answered my original one yet. So I am not answering another one of your questions until you answer mine.

For the fifth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

 

[McRocket]

Trump has so many defenses against this and these news outlets are just dredging up old boring useless stories, yawn.

You have ZERO idea exactly what Trump has or has not to defend himself with against these things as you are not privy to his lawyers accounts/meetings. Why you people say such obviously ridiculous and baseless things is beyond me.

And if this is so boring, why did you even post in this thread (rhetorical question - I don't much care what your answer is)?
Personally, I would not enter a thread that looked boring. Either you are lying and it does not bore you or you have virtually no life so you enter into chat forum threads that have subject matter that 'bore' you.


We are done here.

Have a nice day.

 

[Godboy]

If that's the case, then your basically just repeating my question, which isnt a very effective tactic for winning a debate.

You are trying to 'win a debate'? Okaaaay.

I have near-zero interest in debating with you.

I am simply asking you a question for the third time (which you have yet to answer):

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

Why would you ask a question in response to my question? Why didnt you answer it like a normal person?

What is it with you and reading comprehension?

I did answer your question. I said 'I dunno'. That means - 'I do not know'.

Now for the fourth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

"I dunno" isnt an honest answer. Why cant you just be honest?

Are you mental or something? Of course it's 'honest'.

You typed: 'Why on earth should i care about Trumps mistresses?'
To which I answered: 'I dunno'
I do not know you personally. I don't know what interests you. How the hell would I know why you should care or not care about Trump's mistresses? Jeez!!!

I have answered several of your inane questions...yet you have not answered my original one yet. So I am not answering another one of your questions until you answer mine.

For the fifth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

Youre still not being honest. Why is the truth so hard for you?

 

[McRocket]

You are trying to 'win a debate'? Okaaaay.

I have near-zero interest in debating with you.

I am simply asking you a question for the third time (which you have yet to answer):

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

Why would you ask a question in response to my question? Why didnt you answer it like a normal person?

What is it with you and reading comprehension?

I did answer your question. I said 'I dunno'. That means - 'I do not know'.

Now for the fourth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

"I dunno" isnt an honest answer. Why cant you just be honest?

Are you mental or something? Of course it's 'honest'.

You typed: 'Why on earth should i care about Trumps mistresses?'
To which I answered: 'I dunno'
I do not know you personally. I don't know what interests you. How the hell would I know why you should care or not care about Trump's mistresses? Jeez!!!

I have answered several of your inane questions...yet you have not answered my original one yet. So I am not answering another one of your questions until you answer mine.

For the fifth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

Youre still not being honest. Why is the truth so hard for you?

My troll senses are tingling.

For the sixth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

 

[WheelieAddict]

Mad respect for a man who pays his debts.

The best deals. The porn stars were tremendous. Mexico paid for it.

 

[Godboy]

Why would you ask a question in response to my question? Why didnt you answer it like a normal person?

What is it with you and reading comprehension?

I did answer your question. I said 'I dunno'. That means - 'I do not know'.

Now for the fourth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

"I dunno" isnt an honest answer. Why cant you just be honest?

Are you mental or something? Of course it's 'honest'.

You typed: 'Why on earth should i care about Trumps mistresses?'
To which I answered: 'I dunno'
I do not know you personally. I don't know what interests you. How the hell would I know why you should care or not care about Trump's mistresses? Jeez!!!

I have answered several of your inane questions...yet you have not answered my original one yet. So I am not answering another one of your questions until you answer mine.

For the fifth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

Youre still not being honest. Why is the truth so hard for you?

My troll senses are tingling.

For the sixth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

You arent very bright.

 

[McRocket]

What is it with you and reading comprehension?

I did answer your question. I said 'I dunno'. That means - 'I do not know'.

Now for the fourth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

"I dunno" isnt an honest answer. Why cant you just be honest?

Are you mental or something? Of course it's 'honest'.

You typed: 'Why on earth should i care about Trumps mistresses?'
To which I answered: 'I dunno'
I do not know you personally. I don't know what interests you. How the hell would I know why you should care or not care about Trump's mistresses? Jeez!!!

I have answered several of your inane questions...yet you have not answered my original one yet. So I am not answering another one of your questions until you answer mine.

For the fifth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

Youre still not being honest. Why is the truth so hard for you?

My troll senses are tingling.

For the sixth time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

You arent very bright.

My IQ is 124-126 (as tested by various schools and the government). No genius...but definitely very bright.
And you clearly are a troll (IMO).

Oh...and 'aren't' needs an '...LOL.


For the seventh time:

Why on Earth should I care what you care about?

 

[Aldo Raine]

It's just amazing that the same liberals who will defend every form of perversion under the sun are all upset because Trump paid some mistresses to be silent when he was a private citizen.

Could care less, but did he pay them off with campaign finance money. That is against the law.