First Witness: Publisher of the National Enquirer. 3 Questions for all:

[SavannahMann]

Yes you can. The FEC looked at the payments and found no legal problem with that.

Just to make sure I understand. Biden got a pass on the documents because his Justice Department said it wasn’t worth prosecuting. But. Trump didn’t get a pass because his FEC gave him the no problem with it reply.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Just to make sure I understand. Biden got a pass on the documents because his Justice Department said it wasn’t worth prosecuting. But. Trump didn’t get a pass because his FEC gave him the no problem with it reply.

You are confusing cases. The FEC said the NDA payments were not illegal.

 

[SavannahMann]

You are confusing cases. The FEC said the NDA payments were not illegal.

And wasn’t it Trump’s FEC investigating Trump?

 

[BackAgain]

David Pecker to be first witness in Trump’s hush money trial: New York Times

Magazine publisher David Pecker is slated to be the first witness in former President Trump’s criminal hush money trial, The New York Times reported Sunday, setting the stage as the first criminal …

thehill.com

The prosecution is apparently leaking again.

Citing a person familiar with prosecutors’ planned arguments, the Times reported that Pecker’s testimony is expected to center on his conversations with Trump about the hush money payments.

The questions:

How do you rate the likely truthfulness of David Pecker on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being as honest as George Washington and 1 being as honest Michael Cohen?

How do you rate the honesty of the National Enquirer on the same scale?

If you rate the honesty of the magazine differently than the honesty of its publisher, what is the reason for the difference?

Good questions. One an all.

So of course some of the hacks will give you a bogus “fake news” thanks emoji.

Hacks will be hacks.