Wow, Democrats Had a 92% Turnout in Alabama vrs 2016

[jillian]

Generally, off year, special elections do not pull anything close to the numbers that Presidential elections do.

But the Democrats managed to get 92% of their 2016 turnout to show up in this last special election, while the GOP got less than 50%.

Something smells kind of fishy, vertebrate and invertebrate, IMO.

nothing fishy.

your disgusting child molesting bigot got people out and voting.....

against him.

 

[jillian]

Sounds like lots of dead democrats have been "voting" in Alabama.

poor delusional trumptards

 

[Syriusly]

Anyone who claims that illegal voting has occurred, including trump, should come up with evidence of voter fraud; including where and how. What county? What state? Apparently this is a widespread problem, so how come no evidence of it has been produced?

Evidence like 92% turnout in an off year election that typically sees only 30 to 50%?

That is just evidence of Jimmie's dishonesty.

Yeah, that's a wildly dishonest statement. They had less people voting in this election than did just last year.

Yet its somehow a 'conspiracy'.

Sigh....you can't fix stupid.

Well after all its the same reason why Trump actually 'won' the popular vote too.....lol

 

[JimBowie1958]

Yeah, that's a wildly dishonest statement. They had less people voting in this election than did just last year.

Yet its somehow a 'conspiracy'.

Sigh....you can't fix stupid.

Cant fix your stupid, I guess. By definition 92% is less than 100%, duh.

Show me another off year election in any state that was 92% or more of the previous general election turn out, dunce.

 

[Desperado]

Some of them were even Alabama citizens

 

[Skylar]

Yeah, that's a wildly dishonest statement. They had less people voting in this election than did just last year.

Yet its somehow a 'conspiracy'.

Sigh....you can't fix stupid.

Cant fix your stupid, I guess. By definition 92% is less than 100%, duh.

Show me another off year election in any state that was 92% or more of the previous general election turn out, dunce.

Claiming that it was a 92% election turn out was wildly misleading. Of the roughly 3.5 million eligible voters, about a third voted. With fewer voters this year than last year.

The actual turn out was about 35% of total voters. And by some estimates, about 40% of the registered voters.

Doesn't sound nearly as ominous when awkwardly insinuating conspiracy theories, does it?

 

[Lysistrata]

I will offer political opinion on the U.S.A. political culture later, but for now enjoy the high notes of European culture:


European culture is what some Americans weep about, so why are they are not enjoying?

 

[Lysistrata]

I will offer political opinion on the U.S.A. political culture later, but for now enjoy the high notes of European culture:


European culture is what some Americans weep about, so why are they are not enjoying?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Claiming that it was a 92% election turn out was wildly misleading

Yeah, which is why I didnt say that, jack ass.

I stated the 92% was in comparison to the 2016 turnout, duh.

Do you ever actually read for comprehension instead of how to attack the writer?

 

[Skylar]

Claiming that it was a 92% election turn out was wildly misleading

Yeah, which is why I didnt say that, jack ass.

I stated the 92% was in comparison to the 2016 turnout, duh.

Do you ever actually read for comprehension instead of how to attack the writer?

Smiling...so you didn't say this?

Evidence like 92% turnout in an off year election that typically sees only 30 to 50%?

There wasn't 92% turn out. There was about 35 to 40% turn out, depending on if you're measuring eligible voters, or registered voters. On a typical off year election, you'd see something closer to 30%.

But that doesn't sound nearly as good to conspiracy ears, does it?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Claiming that it was a 92% election turn out was wildly misleading

Yeah, which is why I didnt say that, jack ass.

I stated the 92% was in comparison to the 2016 turnout, duh.

Do you ever actually read for comprehension instead of how to attack the writer?

Smiling...so you didn't say this?

Evidence like 92% turnout in an off year election that typically sees only 30 to 50%?

There wasn't 92% turn out. There was about 35 to 40% turn out, depending on if you're measuring eligible voters, or registered voters. On a typical off year election, you'd see something closer to 30%.

But that doesn't sound nearly as good to conspiracy ears, does it?

I stated it in the title to the thread, jack ass.

Dear Lord, take a reading comprehension class or something.

I am not responsible for you learning how to read.