Steve Hanson
Active Member
- Aug 25, 2010
- 806
- 670
- 28
I'd put that closer to 40%. Many people handle stress very well and are able to postpone their emotions until the danger is past
Shooting another person is an event that most just simply aren't prepared for. Fact
Acting in response to a threat, the "fight or flight" mechanism is something ingrained in every human. When presented with grave danger, emotion stops and we react to the situation instinctively.
"What is my best chance of surviving?", we ask ourselves. If there's an opening to run through and we feel physically able to run, we run. Those of us lying in bed with a revolver close by would likely chose to fight. Training makes the reaction nearly automatic resulting in a loud bang and a dead intruder.
A few moments later is when emotion takes over again. Many people will be ill equipped to deal with what they've done, but many more will roll over and go back to sleep. I'd likely fall somewhere in the middle. I'd probably call the police, put on a pot of coffee and bitch about the mess.
Training is a key. Because most people say, yea, I'd pull the trigger. The problem is is most people won't have a gun in their hands when they face that situation. Their attacker might not have a gun either. So you have to be prepared to act no matter what the situation is. You're at home with a wife and kids. You run, you leave them stranded. An attacker has a gun on one of them? What do you do? It's not always and rarely is a case of I'm sitting here locked and loaded and you come at me.