Would this be Abuse? Parent Raises their Male Child as a Girl without . . .

. . . the male child ever claiming to be a girl or to want to be a girl?

The parents just decide for whatever reason that their boy is a girl, and never tell him that he is different from any other girl. They dress him like a girl, do up his hair like a girl, etc. They register him for school as a girl, in a woke school where a "girl with a penis," is welcome as a sign of their virtue.

When he takes an explicit human sexuality course in the latter part of pre-K, he figures it out.

Abuse or not abuse at all?
Right wing fear porn
 
I bet at some point looking at real girls, he figure out that he ain't one of them. :uhh:
Ah, memories . . .

I had no idea why guys talked about liking girls until the summer I went to YMCA Day Camp. A girl did a backward bridge that stretched her bathing suit against her crotch. My own bathing suit was quickly stretched at the crotch also . . .
 
If the parents were raising him to be a Trump Supporter promoting MAGA and America first, constitutionalism, self-autonomy, religion, and love of country, guns and liberty, the courts would throw the book at the parents.

But since they were raising him to explore his inner identity as a transwoman and free spirit, with full gender fluidity, they are likely to get a grant from the State. :smoke:


Exactly.
 
I had no idea why guys talked about liking girls until the summer I went to YMCA Day Camp. A girl did a backward bridge that stretched her bathing suit against her crotch. My own bathing suit was quickly stretched at the crotch also . . .

I just heard an account where Dylan Mulvaney (the Bud Lite He-She) was walking down the street near where he lived passed a little girl on a bike he had seen many time and this time the girl asked him: "Excuse me, but why are you dressed up like a woman?!"
 
An interesting experiment but one that would have to be done in secret and with full anonymity .
To avoid lynching .
 
Yeah, it must be exhausting to get all in a huff and pearl-clutchy over made up hypothetical scenarios.
I was wondering if any Democrat would come on this thread. Because what could they possibly answer to defend their Party's policies of raising boys to be girls if their parents made a claim of transgenderism on their behalf.

This is is? That I'm making the whole thing up, because no parent are raising their boys to be girls and justifying it with a claim of childhood transgenderism? I guess to be a Democrat requires a lot of blind eye turning, huh?

1698838903409.png
 
No, this story did not happen that I know of. The example provided by el midgetron above is very similar, though.

But even more similar stories are really happening, right now.

The only difference is that instead of "for whatever reason," the parent claims that the child in question actually WANTS to be a girl, and therefore they should be allowed to do everything that the parents in my hypothetical story do. And they are not only allowed to do it, they are praised for doing it. HBO does documentaries about how awesome they are to do it. Anyone who does not agree with it is called "transphobic" and accused of hating "trans kids."

That's it. A claim by a parent who by any standard is mentally ill is all it takes to convert a clear case of mental abuse into a virtue, according to our mainstream media.

Until you start pumping them full of hormones and mutilating them, it's just terrible parenting.

That's a line I wouldn't want to cross vis a vis government interactions.
 
Until you start pumping them full of hormones and mutilating them, it's just terrible parenting.

I would have to say that even without any physical abuse, such as the application of inappropriate drugs or surgeries, the mere act of intentionally filling a child's head with such harmful falsehoods would have to constitute abuse, at a level where some authority ought to intervene to protect that child.
 
I would have to say that even without any physical abuse, such as the application of inappropriate drugs or surgeries, the mere act of intentionally filling a child's head with such harmful falsehoods would have to constitute abuse, at a level where some authority ought to intervene to protect that child.

The issue with intervention is progressives can say religious parents are doing the same thing, and we all know they are far more apt to use government to get their way.

It's a pandora's box I'd rather not open.
 
The issue with intervention is progressives can say religious parents are doing the same thing, and we all know they are far more apt to use government to get their way.
It's a pandora's box I'd rather not open.

This is what you get when you allow the premise to take root, that government is compelled to be “neutral” in matters of good vs. evil, reason vs, madness.

I think that it is clearly obvious to any person that is not severely fucked in the head, that it is harmful and evil to intentionally deceive and confuse a child about something as crucial as the distinction between boys and girls. It should be equally obvious that it is a good thing to teach a child religious faith and values.

The very possibility that one principle might be turned against the other is a symptom of how damaged we have allowed our society to become.
 
This is what you get when you allow the premise to take root, that government is compelled to be “neutral” in matters of good vs. evil, reason vs, madness.

I think that it is clearly obvious to any person that is not severely fucked in the head, that it is harmful and evil to intentionally deceive and confuse a child about something as crucial as the distinction between boys and girls. It should be equally obvious that it is a good thing to teach a child religious faith and values.

The very possibility that one principle might be turned against the other is a symptom of how damaged we have allowed our society to become.

Well they can argue that Hasidic and Amish parents are "abusing" their kids by denying them modern technology, education in modern ideas, and damning the females to a "life of servitude"

Whenever a person wants to use some mechanism against something they don't like, they MUST anticipate how the other side might use it against them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top