'World's' Most Fake News EXPOSED...AGAIN

[jillian]

How do you know it's fake news? Maybe NOAA actually did rush the report?

The 'Fake News' to which I was referring IS 'Global WARMING'. NOA DID rush the report. NOA DID fake the data...again.

i love how rightwingnuts can't tell made fact from reality.

 

[Old Rocks]

Again, find me a Scientific Society, a National Academy of Science, or a major University that rejects the reality of AGW in their policy statements.

why, they don't represent the scientists. post one with a scientist name on it.

Yes, you are truly that stupid.

• Home
• Robin Elizabeth Bell

ROBIN ELIZABETH BELL

AGU member since 1983. Expertise is in ice sheet dynamics and mass balance, subglacial lakes, geodynamics, interaction of tectonics and ice sheet processes, estuarine processes marine and airborne geophysical technology including gravity, gravity gradiometry, radar and lidar. BA in Geology from Middlebury College, 1980, PhD in Geophysics from Columbia University, 1989. Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory employee since 1989. 64 Peer-reviewed articles (11 in AGU journals), 2 Congressional Testimonies, 5 National Academies Reports. Honors include: Elected AGU Fellow, 2011, USGS Named Antarctic Ridge (77° 18' 15" S, 160° 59' 30" E) After R.E. Bell 2006 for Leadership in Antarctic Science, Middlebury College awarded Honorary Doctorate of Science, 2006, Emma Willard School Young Alumnae Award 1996, Lamont’s Stroke Doherty Junior Scientist Award 1992, Outstanding Student Paper, Geodesy - Fall AGU 1988. Major scientific accomplishments include identified of widespread basal freeze-on beneath large ice sheets (2011), discovered major subglacial lakes linked to onset fast ice flow (2007), developed first systemic flux estimates through subglacial Lake Vostok (2002), advanced concept of geologic control on ice stream onset (1998) and identified flow of hot mid-ocean ridge crust (1992). JGR Associate Editor (1992-1994), AGU Geodesy Program Committee 1993-1994, AGU Sullivan Award Committee 2006-2010.



CHRIS BALLENTINE

Director
Email



ERIC A. DAVIDSON
President
Email



JOSHUA M GREENBERG
Director
Email



KELLY KLIMA
Director
Email



MARGARET LEINEN
Past President
Email



CHRISTINE W. MCENTEE
Executive Director/CEO
Email



SOROOSH SOROOSHIAN
Director
Email



ROBIN ELIZABETH BELL
President-elect
Email



CARLOS DENGO
Director
Email



BRANDON JONES
Director
Email



KERSTIN LEHNERT
Director
Email



CATHRYN A. MANDUCA
Director
Email



LOUISE PELLERIN
General Secretary
Email



SUSA

Click on their names, and you can get their bio's. Most are pretty impressive.

 

[jc456]

Again, find me a Scientific Society, a National Academy of Science, or a major University that rejects the reality of AGW in their policy statements.

why, they don't represent the scientists. post one with a scientist name on it.

Yes, you are truly that stupid.

• Home
• Robin Elizabeth Bell

ROBIN ELIZABETH BELL

AGU member since 1983. Expertise is in ice sheet dynamics and mass balance, subglacial lakes, geodynamics, interaction of tectonics and ice sheet processes, estuarine processes marine and airborne geophysical technology including gravity, gravity gradiometry, radar and lidar. BA in Geology from Middlebury College, 1980, PhD in Geophysics from Columbia University, 1989. Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory employee since 1989. 64 Peer-reviewed articles (11 in AGU journals), 2 Congressional Testimonies, 5 National Academies Reports. Honors include: Elected AGU Fellow, 2011, USGS Named Antarctic Ridge (77° 18' 15" S, 160° 59' 30" E) After R.E. Bell 2006 for Leadership in Antarctic Science, Middlebury College awarded Honorary Doctorate of Science, 2006, Emma Willard School Young Alumnae Award 1996, Lamont’s Stroke Doherty Junior Scientist Award 1992, Outstanding Student Paper, Geodesy - Fall AGU 1988. Major scientific accomplishments include identified of widespread basal freeze-on beneath large ice sheets (2011), discovered major subglacial lakes linked to onset fast ice flow (2007), developed first systemic flux estimates through subglacial Lake Vostok (2002), advanced concept of geologic control on ice stream onset (1998) and identified flow of hot mid-ocean ridge crust (1992). JGR Associate Editor (1992-1994), AGU Geodesy Program Committee 1993-1994, AGU Sullivan Award Committee 2006-2010.



CHRIS BALLENTINE

Director
Email



ERIC A. DAVIDSON
President
Email



JOSHUA M GREENBERG
Director
Email



KELLY KLIMA
Director
Email



MARGARET LEINEN
Past President
Email



CHRISTINE W. MCENTEE
Executive Director/CEO
Email



SOROOSH SOROOSHIAN
Director
Email



ROBIN ELIZABETH BELL
President-elect
Email



CARLOS DENGO
Director
Email



BRANDON JONES
Director
Email



KERSTIN LEHNERT
Director
Email



CATHRYN A. MANDUCA
Director
Email



LOUISE PELLERIN
General Secretary
Email



SUSA

Click on their names, and you can get their bio's. Most are pretty impressive.

I see one common pattern, all are decisions makers. Now, post up the actual scientists that write the documents.

 

[jc456]

Again, find me a Scientific Society, a National Academy of Science, or a major University that rejects the reality of AGW in their policy statements.

why, they don't represent the scientists. post one with a scientist name on it.

Yes, you are truly that stupid.

• Home
• Robin Elizabeth Bell

ROBIN ELIZABETH BELL

AGU member since 1983. Expertise is in ice sheet dynamics and mass balance, subglacial lakes, geodynamics, interaction of tectonics and ice sheet processes, estuarine processes marine and airborne geophysical technology including gravity, gravity gradiometry, radar and lidar. BA in Geology from Middlebury College, 1980, PhD in Geophysics from Columbia University, 1989. Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory employee since 1989. 64 Peer-reviewed articles (11 in AGU journals), 2 Congressional Testimonies, 5 National Academies Reports. Honors include: Elected AGU Fellow, 2011, USGS Named Antarctic Ridge (77° 18' 15" S, 160° 59' 30" E) After R.E. Bell 2006 for Leadership in Antarctic Science, Middlebury College awarded Honorary Doctorate of Science, 2006, Emma Willard School Young Alumnae Award 1996, Lamont’s Stroke Doherty Junior Scientist Award 1992, Outstanding Student Paper, Geodesy - Fall AGU 1988. Major scientific accomplishments include identified of widespread basal freeze-on beneath large ice sheets (2011), discovered major subglacial lakes linked to onset fast ice flow (2007), developed first systemic flux estimates through subglacial Lake Vostok (2002), advanced concept of geologic control on ice stream onset (1998) and identified flow of hot mid-ocean ridge crust (1992). JGR Associate Editor (1992-1994), AGU Geodesy Program Committee 1993-1994, AGU Sullivan Award Committee 2006-2010.



CHRIS BALLENTINE

Director
Email



ERIC A. DAVIDSON
President
Email



JOSHUA M GREENBERG
Director
Email



KELLY KLIMA
Director
Email



MARGARET LEINEN
Past President
Email



CHRISTINE W. MCENTEE
Executive Director/CEO
Email



SOROOSH SOROOSHIAN
Director
Email



ROBIN ELIZABETH BELL
President-elect
Email



CARLOS DENGO
Director
Email



BRANDON JONES
Director
Email



KERSTIN LEHNERT
Director
Email



CATHRYN A. MANDUCA
Director
Email



LOUISE PELLERIN
General Secretary
Email



SUSA

Click on their names, and you can get their bio's. Most are pretty impressive.

Funny you don't use Judith Curry's name . Oh, that's right , she resigned because those directors changed her report doh

 

[easyt65]

i love how rightwingnuts can't tell made fact from reality.

I love how 'rightwing nuts' provide articles, evidence, etc...and you can tell snowflakes are DESPERATELY pushing fake news and OPINION because they offer NOTHING BUT OPINION to support it.

Rock on, Jill!

 

[Billo_Really]

Whistleblower: NOAA Scientists Manipulated Temperature Data To Make Global Warming Seem Worse

NOAA Scientists Manipulated Temperature Data To Make Global Warming Seem Worse

"A whistleblower says the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) rushed a landmark study claiming the planet was warming much faster than expected in order to influence international climate negotiations.

“Dr. Bates’ revelations and NOAA’s obstruction certainly lend credence to what I’ve expected all along – that the Karl study used flawed data, was rushed to publication in an effort to support the president’s climate change agenda, and ignored NOAA’s own standards for scientific study,”

Scientists have been debating over the so-called “pause” in global warming since at least 2013, referring to the period from 1998 to 2014 without any significant rise in global average temperature.

Curry wrote that it “seems rather ironic, since this is the period where there is the greatest coverage of data with the highest quality of measurements — ARGO buoys and satellites don’t show a warming trend.”

The only thing that is fake in these bullshit threads, is this manufactured protest against global warming from little fossil fuel bitches like yourself. Arguing against climate change, is about as stupid as arguing gravity plays no role in plane crashes.

 

[easyt65]

Yo Billy, many of the things we use everyday - more than people realize, everything from tires to tooth brushes - are made from fossil fuels.

Ever try to make tires from a f*ing ray of sunshine or a gust of wind?

When you finally are able to do so, making eliminating the use of fossil fuels a reality, let me know, you little 'green energy bit@h'!

 

[mamooth]

[
Funny you don't use Judith Curry's name . Oh, that's right , she resigned because those directors changed her report doh

Where'd that conspiracy theory pop out of? The stories about Curry's pouty "You're all poopyheads!" resignation are getting crazier.

We love to bring up Curry's name, to point out just how badly denier science sucks, and to point out that deniers tend to be mentally unstable conspiracy cranks.

Curry just did an interview with David Icke's group.

You people familiar with David Icke? He's the main proponent of the reptoid theory. That is, he says shapeshifting reptiles from an alternate dimension walk among us, and that many of our politicians are such reptoids.

And Curry is his buddy now. She's now scraping rock bottom with the company she keeps.

So, do the rest of you deniers also believe that the reptoids walk hidden among us?

 

[Crick]

Yo Billy, many of the things we use everyday - more than people realize, everything from tires to tooth brushes - are made from fossil fuels.

Ever try to make tires from a f*ing ray of sunshine or a gust of wind?

When you finally are able to do so, making eliminating the use of fossil fuels a reality, let me know, you little 'green energy bit@h'!

You don't have to burn fossil fuels to use them as a material resource.

 

[jc456]

Whistleblower: NOAA Scientists Manipulated Temperature Data To Make Global Warming Seem Worse

NOAA Scientists Manipulated Temperature Data To Make Global Warming Seem Worse

"A whistleblower says the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) rushed a landmark study claiming the planet was warming much faster than expected in order to influence international climate negotiations.

“Dr. Bates’ revelations and NOAA’s obstruction certainly lend credence to what I’ve expected all along – that the Karl study used flawed data, was rushed to publication in an effort to support the president’s climate change agenda, and ignored NOAA’s own standards for scientific study,”

Scientists have been debating over the so-called “pause” in global warming since at least 2013, referring to the period from 1998 to 2014 without any significant rise in global average temperature.

Curry wrote that it “seems rather ironic, since this is the period where there is the greatest coverage of data with the highest quality of measurements — ARGO buoys and satellites don’t show a warming trend.”

The only thing that is fake in these bullshit threads, is this manufactured protest against global warming from little fossil fuel bitches like yourself. Arguing against climate change, is about as stupid as arguing gravity plays no role in plane crashes.

Huh?

 

[jc456]

Yo Billy, many of the things we use everyday - more than people realize, everything from tires to tooth brushes - are made from fossil fuels.

Ever try to make tires from a f*ing ray of sunshine or a gust of wind?

When you finally are able to do so, making eliminating the use of fossil fuels a reality, let me know, you little 'green energy bit@h'!

In other words the left is lost

 

[jc456]

How do you know it's fake news? Maybe NOAA actually did rush the report?

The 'Fake News' to which I was referring IS 'Global WARMING'. NOA DID rush the report. NOA DID fake the data...again.

i love how rightwingnuts can't tell made fact from reality.

I find funny is what you don't know about biproducts of oil! Tell me smart you are and explain what cones from oil?

 

[jc456]

Yo Billy, many of the things we use everyday - more than people realize, everything from tires to tooth brushes - are made from fossil fuels.

Ever try to make tires from a f*ing ray of sunshine or a gust of wind?

When you finally are able to do so, making eliminating the use of fossil fuels a reality, let me know, you little 'green energy bit@h'!

You don't have to burn fossil fuels to use them as a material resource.

But you need it right?

 

[RollingThunder]

Whistleblower: NOAA Scientists Manipulated Temperature Data To Make Global Warming Seem Worse

NOAA Scientists Manipulated Temperature Data To Make Global Warming Seem Worse

"A whistleblower says the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) rushed a landmark study claiming the planet was warming much faster than expected in order to influence international climate negotiations.

“Dr. Bates’ revelations and NOAA’s obstruction certainly lend credence to what I’ve expected all along – that the Karl study used flawed data, was rushed to publication in an effort to support the president’s climate change agenda, and ignored NOAA’s own standards for scientific study,”

Scientists have been debating over the so-called “pause” in global warming since at least 2013, referring to the period from 1998 to 2014 without any significant rise in global average temperature.

Curry wrote that it “seems rather ironic, since this is the period where there is the greatest coverage of data with the highest quality of measurements — ARGO buoys and satellites don’t show a warming trend.”

The usual braindead denier cult fraudulent drivel, based only on the stupidity, ignorance and gullility of the rightwingnuts.

In the real world....

Climate Change, Science, NOAA Falsely Maligned by Tabloid Spin
(excerpts)
As a result of human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels, the planet is warming. Those who deny this fact have pointed to a supposed “pause” in warming to justify opposition to climate action. In 2015, a study led by NOAA’s Tom Karl was published in Science that flatly refuted the idea of a “pause.” It is one of many. But its high profile made it a target for attack.

On Saturday, a feature in the UK’s Mail on Sunday by David Rose makes outrageous claims that were already disproven as the paper version hit stands, and that he has already had to, in part, correct. Rose, who has a history of inaccurate reporting, spins a scandal out of a letter by a former NOAA employee published on a climate change denial blog. The letter makes accusations of wrongdoing in the methodology and data archiving procedures used in the study. These accusations have already been shown to be faulty. Even if they were true, the implications have been blown out of proportion by Rose.

Rebuttals were published in record time, as within minutes there was a tweet describing the story as “so wrong its hard to know where to start”:

● John Abraham provides context in the Guardian, and points out the many factors Rose fails to address that, when considered, completely undercut his allegations of misconduct.

● Zeke Hausfather, in a fact check, discusses the various lines of evidence that support Karl’s findings. Hausfather published a study in 2016 that confirmed Karl’s findings that the planet has continued to warm, confirming there was never any real “pause.”

● Scott Johnson at Ars Technica spoke with NOAA insiders, and explains how tensions between the science and engineering side of things caused conflict between Karl, who wanted the handling of data to reflect the many sources of the data, and Bates, who advocated for using just one approach that could handle data from many different sources, but sometimes added years to the process.

● Peter Thorne at the Irish Climate Analysis and Research Units, who unlike the letter’s author actually worked on the Karl paper, identifies several key aspects of the allegations that are a “mis-representation of the processes that actually occurred. In some cases these mis-representations are publically verifiable.”

● Victor Venema of the WMO discusses both the specifics of the data sets as well as some lighthearted context to help understand the “reporting” done by the Mail’s David Rose.

● Ten climate envoys and ministers involved with the Paris Agreement said there was no truth to Rose’s claim that this study influenced their decisions.

● In an interview, Bates pushed back on the allegations made by Rose, and “specified that he did not believe that they manipulated the data upon which the research relied in any way.” And said that "The issue here is not an issue of tampering with data, but rather really of timing of a release of a paper that had not properly disclosed everything it was," he said.

(Read more at site)

 

[Crick]

To reiterate and further emphasize: Bates, the author of the "whistleblower" letter, "did not believe that they [Karl et al] manipulated the data upon with the research relied in any way"

 

[jc456]

To reiterate and further emphasize: Bates, the author of the "whistleblower" letter, "did not believe that they [Karl et al] manipulated the data upon with the research relied in any way"

Then provide his statement that disagrees with the OP

 

[edthecynic]

To reiterate and further emphasize: Bates, the author of the "whistleblower" letter, "did not believe that they [Karl et al] manipulated the data upon with the research relied in any way"

Then provide his statement that disagrees with the OP

Major global warming study again questioned, again defended
Bates, who acknowledges that Earth is warming from man-made carbon dioxide emissions, said in the interview that there was "no data tampering, no data changing, nothing malicious."

"It's really a story of not disclosing what you did," Bates said in the interview. "It's not trumped up data in any way shape or form."

 

[easyt65]

I guess liberals think that if you write / post in HUGE, COLORFUL letters people will believe your OPINION more....sort of like how ignorant people believe if they speak LOUDER and more SLOWLY to people who do not speak English they will suddenly be able to understand them.

NOA, NASA, the 'hockey stick, etc.... they have been PROVEN to have ignored, manipulated, and falsified data to bolster their views / opinions / findings / agenda. The use of the color BLUE in the statements above are appropriate, as Global Warming 'snake-oil salesmen' can argue until they are BLUE in the face and still not be able to change that fact.

 

[jc456]

To reiterate and further emphasize: Bates, the author of the "whistleblower" letter, "did not believe that they [Karl et al] manipulated the data upon with the research relied in any way"

Then provide his statement that disagrees with the OP

Major global warming study again questioned, again defended
Bates, who acknowledges that Earth is warming from man-made carbon dioxide emissions, said in the interview that there was "no data tampering, no data changing, nothing malicious."

"It's really a story of not disclosing what you did," Bates said in the interview. "It's not trumped up data in any way shape or form."

hmmm, funny cause he said this in the same article you linked:

"Bates said in an interview Monday with The Associated Press that he was most concerned about the way data was handled, documented and stored, raising issues of transparency and availability."

 

[edthecynic]

To reiterate and further emphasize: Bates, the author of the "whistleblower" letter, "did not believe that they [Karl et al] manipulated the data upon with the research relied in any way"

Then provide his statement that disagrees with the OP

Major global warming study again questioned, again defended
Bates, who acknowledges that Earth is warming from man-made carbon dioxide emissions, said in the interview that there was "no data tampering, no data changing, nothing malicious."

"It's really a story of not disclosing what you did," Bates said in the interview. "It's not trumped up data in any way shape or form."

hmmm, funny cause he said this in the same article you linked:

"Bates said in an interview Monday with The Associated Press that he was most concerned about the way data was handled, documented and stored, raising issues of transparency and availability."

Right, Bates' issue was with disclosure, not manipulation. The data WAS disclosed, and in fact, in a Science interview Bates said, The Science paper would have been fine had it simply had a disclaimer at the bottom saying that it was citing research, not operational, data for its land-surface temperatures.

Factcheck: Mail on Sunday's 'astonishing evidence' about global temperature rise | Carbon Brief

In his article, David Rose relies on reports from a researcher at NOAA who was unhappy about the data archiving associated with the Karl et al paper. While I cannot speak to how well the authors followed internal protocols, they did release their temperature anomalies, spatially gridded data land and ocean data, and the land station data associated with their analysis. They put all of this up on NOAA’s FTP site in early June 2015, at the time that the Karl et al paper was published.

As someone who works on and develops surface temperature records, the data they provided would be sufficient for me to examine their analysis in detail and see how it compared to other groups. In fact, I used the data they provided shortly after the paper was published to do just that.