The argument has been made that considering all of the massive political bias within the FBI that has been exposed - not to mention the extreme political bias and collusion within and between the Obama DOJ, CIA, NIA, and FBI in a unified effort to ensure Donald Trump did not win the WH and goal of removing him from office if he did get elected (treason), it will be d@mned-near impossible for Mueller to get a prosecution of anyone in this witch hunt. Rest assured, though - despite having to go back to before Obama was elected President and ignore Manafort's partner at the time was Hillary's campaign manager - who he has protected from the same indictment he charged Manafort with, Mueller will walk away with his own 'Scooter Libby' indictment of Manafort....and snowflakes will rejoice and parrot the Liberal propaganda line of how that was complete justification for their witch hunt / treason. Trey Gowdy: With all this bias at the FBI, I don't know how Mueller successfully prosecutes anyone 'On Friday, marveling at Gowdy’s anger over the IG report, I flagged the following quote about Peter Strzok from his interview with Bret Baier the night before. No one within the GOP has been as stalwart a defender of the Russiagate probe as Gowdy has. The despair was palpable: “God only knows what damage he has done before Mueller fired him (Strzok). This is what’s so pervasive about bias, Bret, it doesn’t matter what Mueller comes up with. Some people are going to believe that Strzok’s level of animus was so high that you can’t remove the taint.” "Gowdy’s looking at Mueller’s dilemma from the perspective of a prosecutor. Put aside the question of whether Strzok’s bias actually influenced his investigative decisions. The cold, hard fact is that he *was* biased and the entire world now knows it." "...that bias is so pervasive and everyone who’s ever stood in front of a jury and had to explain it away we’ll tell you it is most miserable feeling in the world. And I have never seen this level of bias. So, you have Peter Strzok who can’t think of a single American who can vote for Donald Trump and you got Peter Strzok who says, we’ll stop it. The campaign and the presidency, we’ll stop the campaign and if it doesn’t work, the day after the election, he’s talking about impeachment. So, how would you like that to be your lead investigator? Two weeks after you’re assigned to look into what a foreign country did to us, the only thing he can think to talk about is an insurance policy to keep Donald Trump from winning, and then he says we’ll stop it. I assume the “we” is the FBI. So, how would you like if you’re Bob Mueller to present that case to a jury?" A pi$$ed-off Mueller and the rest of the rabid, reality-denying, butt-hurt Trump-Haters will settle for a conviction of Manafort - as long as none of the Democrats exposed as having committed crimes are held accountable, and they along with the complicit Anti-Trump Liberal media will attempt to sell the idea that a conviction of Manafort for a crime that occurred before Obama was elected President was justification for their treasonous witch hunt / attempted political coup.... ...and snowflakes will eat it up and parrot it forever.