Oldandtired
Rookie
- Banned
- #61
You might be correct. And the republican party needs a new face so it's about time
I thought his rebuttal was good.
First....I voted for McDonnell. I lke his ideas FOR VIRGINIA. However, you and another poster talked about how McDonnell provided substance. I heard McDonnell wander through some tlaking points on education. Can you please point out the substance that he provided, as I did not hear any?
There was none.
ANd by no means an effort to say it was okay that he offered no substance, as it was quite disappointing, I found that Obamas SOTU adddress also offered no substance.
It seemd to me that he offered a vision.....but with little to no concrete ideas.
A jobs bill? Explain exactly what you want to see.
Healthcare? Explain what needs to be in it for support and approval
Instead he pretty much spent the better part of 70 minutes saying...
'there will be food on every table, healthcare in every household, unemployment will decrease, deficit will decrease, debt will decrease, taxes will not go up, defense will be strong...etc...etc...etc...
Well......duh? Of course that is what we all want....but to date it has never been achevied by anyone...exactly how do you plan to get bi partisan support to make that happen?
Results are arbitrary...methods is what we need to hear and debate.
If he discussed methods, I would say he offered substance.