Will Saddam’s WMDs Fall into the Hands of Al Qaeda?

This fantasy about Sryria's sarin coming from Saddam Hussein is persistent.

The desire to believe in some people causes them to invent lies and overrides facts and evidence to the contrary.


.
 
why is it the world disagrees with the American right on the facts?

Hey dummy.... The "world" didn't disagree before we invaded.

Get a clue twat.
They like to ignore the 40-60-nation coalition that Bush built. It didn't fit in with their GWB-is-a-mad-magazine-chimp image-building bullshit du jour.

Like you ignored that the discussion was about chemical weapons and not nuclear weapons?
 
Evidence, please.
It's up your ass.

Pull the dick out and take a peek

Sorry to destroy your fantasy of usable chemical WMDs found in Iraq after the invasion!

Looks like you will have to live with the fact Syria's sarin came from another source.
.
Sorry, Sandy Berger's wannabe thefts didn't go through from the get-go. He only stole "evidence" that was duplicated, and not originals.

IOW, they fooled the ambitious Hillary Clinton out of her certain screaming desire to prove Bush was a liar when actually, she was.

The National Archives librarians deserve a medal for keeping Sandy Berger outta the goods. We have moved the National Archives to a safety location until the history-rewriting imbeciles are out of power.

:muahaha:

Sandy Berger's sentence for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives
 
Here's another article about the same roadside IED: Deadly Nerve Agent Sarin Is Found in Roadside Bomb

But weapons experts cautioned that the shell appeared to predate the 1991 Persian Gulf War and did not necessarily mean that Hussein possessed hidden stockpiles of chemical munitions.

Experts familiar with Iraq's chemical weapons program said the shell was likely a leftover from Hussein's pre-Gulf War stockpile. Iraq acknowledged producing nearly 800 tons of sarin and thousands of sarin-filled rockets and artillery shells between 1984 and 1990.

The experts, including David Kay, the Pentagon's former top weapons hunter in Iraq, said the discovery did not conclusively prove the existence of stockpiles of concealed chemical and biological weapons.

.
 
It's up your ass.

Pull the dick out and take a peek

Sorry to destroy your fantasy of usable chemical WMDs found in Iraq after the invasion!

Looks like you will have to live with the fact Syria's sarin came from another source.
.
Sorry, Sandy Berger's wannabe thefts didn't go through from the get-go. He only stole "evidence" that was duplicated, and not originals.

IOW, they fooled the ambitious Hillary Clinton out of her certain screaming desire to prove Bush was a liar when actually, she was.

The National Archives librarians deserve a medal for keeping Sandy Berger outta the goods. We have moved the National Archives to a safety location until the history-rewriting imbeciles are out of power.

:muahaha:

Sandy Berger's sentence for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives

Wow. You've really fallen off the sanity cliff.

.
 
They like to ignore the 40-60-nation coalition that Bush built. It didn't fit in with their GWB-is-a-mad-magazine-chimp image-building bullshit du jour.

Like you ignored that the discussion was about chemical weapons and not nuclear weapons?
Like you ignore that both are classified as WOMDs, tweetie pie? :lmao:

The question was about whether or not the imaginary Hussein sarin WMDs will fall into the hands of Syrian rebels who belong to AQ. Do try to keep up.

.
 
For you Libtards who refuse to believe the truth, ASSAD IS ALREADY USING GAS ON THE REBELS!!!!!

And there are hints that he's moving them into Lebanon to use against Israel. What will happen then if he does?

Get your heads out of your arses and pay attention to what is going on. How do you think Assad so quickly built up his military after Desert Storm?:mad:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxxwfaIAl_Q&sns=em]Obama Warns Syria's Assad Chemical Weapons A 'RED Line' - YouTube[/ame]
 
No one is currently disputing that Assad is preparing sarin WMDs to use against the rebels.

You dipshits got that?

The dispute is over the stupid fantasy being invented that the sarin came from Saddam Hussein.

While you idiots are so busy trying to justify your fantasy, you are letting the real criminals who gave Syria the sarin off the hook.

Syria either created the components itself (doubtful), or got the precursors from Iran or Egypt.


.
 
Last edited:
This fantasy about Sryria's sarin coming from Saddam Hussein is persistent.

The desire to believe in some people causes them to invent lies and overrides facts and evidence to the contrary.


.

I have thought this for over 9 years...

It's nothing new Dude.
 
No one is currently disputing that Assad is preparing sarin WMDs to use against the rebels.

You dipshits got that?

The dispute is over the stupid fantasy being invented that the sarin came from Saddam Hussein.

While you idiots are so busy trying to justify your fantasy, you are letting the real criminals who gave Syria the sarin off the hook.

Syria either created the components itself (doubtful), or got the precursors from Iran or Egypt.


.

Since you want to call us dipshits... How about you prove your assertions asshole.
 
and they are also advocating doing a shock and awe in Syria

I don't know what shock and awe you're talking about but the Obama administration isn't about to do a shock and awe anywhere. So far he's been cleaning up Bush messes and will not get in deeper in the middle east unless we're attacked.
 
No one is currently disputing that Assad is preparing sarin WMDs to use against the rebels.

You dipshits got that?

The dispute is over the stupid fantasy being invented that the sarin came from Saddam Hussein.

While you idiots are so busy trying to justify your fantasy, you are letting the real criminals who gave Syria the sarin off the hook.

Syria either created the components itself (doubtful), or got the precursors from Iran or Egypt.


.

Since you want to call us dipshits... How about you prove your assertions asshole.

I have. The shells that were found in Iraq were degraded, pre-1991 agents. I proved that over and over in this topic.

If you like, I can dredge up the Syrian topic from last week in which I proved that sarin precursors have a shelf life of 5 years. And that is what Syria has. Precursors.

The invasion of Iraq was ten years ago. Do the math.



.
 
Here, I dug it up anyway:

Sarin itself has a shelf life of just a few weeks.

Keeping the precursors separate provides a shelf life of about 5 years:

Nations stockpiling sarin have tried to overcome the problem of its short shelf life in three ways. One way is to lengthen the shelf life of unitary (pure) sarin by increasing the purity of the precursor and intermediate chemicals and refining the production process. Another way to increase shelf life is by incorporating a stabilizer chemical. Initially used was tributylamine, but later this was replaced by diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC), which allowed for sarin to be stored in aluminum casings. Finally, stockpiling of sarin can be improved by developing binary chemical weapons, where the two precursor chemicals are stored separately in the same shell, and mixed to form the agent immediately before or when the shell is in flight. This approach has the dual benefit of making the issue of shelf life irrelevant and greatly increasing the safety of sarin munitions. However, experts do not put the shelf life of this type of weapon past 5 years.

Sarin - New World Encyclopedia


.
 

Forum List

Back
Top