Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
. Nothing wrong with reform.. I agree that everything can be improved.They represent you like unions represent all workers.Sure because the market is flooded with guns. There’s zero regulations. It’s almost as if the system is designed so that flooding the markets..... of course they are gun manufacurers. Any company wants to sell more not less.NOT legally they can't. It is against the law for a felon to own a weapon already. Yet, they still do! Go figure!
It should be a big deal when you buy sell or lose a gun. Somethings wrong and the nra doesn’t want to fix it
The NRA is a special interest group that is concerned with protecting the 2A from government intrusion. That is all. They are not responsible for what gun manufacturers do or what is going on in the black market. That doesn't have anything to do with the NRA.
The NRA represents gun and ammo manufacturers - Not you and not me.
Sucker
They do represent me, thankfully. Go NRA! I am SO grateful for this wonderful grassroots organization.
The True Source of the N.R.A.’s Clout: Mobilization, Not Donations
The nra doesn’t need to go away just reform
Been my experience in life.. You tell those lies with a straight face do ya ?Conservatives never have followed the law.
Well with 300 million guns in circulation since forever and a day in this country now, it's just hilarious that you are asking such dumb questions. Not a gun problem, but a societal breakdown is what we have now. Now the tough job is talking all the groups into not fearing each other. Then see who will lay down their guns first. Good luck.Q. Are "gang banger's" dressed in camouflage, who claim to be members of the Militia?
Q. Have members of the Militia taken the oath to support and defend the Constitution of the U.S. of A.? Or, is the Milita limited to the Nation Guard and the Navy Reserve?
More lies and more extremist hyperbole from Joe Shmo.
Gun control laws will always fail because criminals and especially murderers ignore laws.
And you lost me with "mass slaughter caused by the 2nd amendment " Where does it say in the 2nd Amendment to take up arms to slaughter innocent unarmed teenagers? Where? And if t you think LIberty is a distraction, go live in North Korea where you'd fit right in.
/——/ There were plenty of crazies around in 1776. The Founding Fathers didn’t need to spell out everything.And you lost me with "mass slaughter caused by the 2nd amendment " Where does it say in the 2nd Amendment to take up arms to slaughter innocent unarmed teenagers? Where? And if t you think LIberty is a distraction, go live in North Korea where you'd fit right in.
The part where it says that "the people" can have arms, if you ignore the "Well-Regulated Militia" part.
It says that crazy people like Nikolas Cruz, Adam Lanza, Steven Paddock, James "Joker" Holmes, Omar Mateen, etc, etc, etc.. have a right to own guns, despite their history of violence or mental instability.
.Enjoy your fun while it last, because conservatives are gonna clean up the dang Demon-crat mess like they always have to. Then you won't be able to create those Boogeymen for your agenda's anymore.And you lost me with "mass slaughter caused by the 2nd amendment " Where does it say in the 2nd Amendment to take up arms to slaughter innocent unarmed teenagers? Where? And if t you think LIberty is a distraction, go live in North Korea where you'd fit right in.
The part where it says that "the people" can have arms, if you ignore the "Well-Regulated Militia" part.
It says that crazy people like Nikolas Cruz, Adam Lanza, Steven Paddock, James "Joker" Holmes, Omar Mateen, etc, etc, etc.. have a right to own guns, despite their history of violence or mental instability.
/——/ There were plenty of crazies around in 1776. The Gounding Fathers didn’t need to spell out everything.
Enjoy your fun while it last, because conservatives are gonna clean up the dang Demon-crat mess like they always have to. Then you won't be able to create those Boogeymen for your agenda's anymore.
/——/ There were plenty of crazies around in 1776. The Gounding Fathers didn’t need to spell out everything.
Here's the thing. The Founding (not gounding) Slave Rapists may have had plenty of crazies in their days.
But in their days, the fire rate on a musket was maybe three shots a minute if you were highly trained, and the range was less than 50 meters, and they just weren't that lethal. They were expensive to produce and not everyone had access to them.
It's why the muskets had bayonets on them.
An AR-15 can fire 45 rounds a minute! The range is about 450 meters. And the Gun Industry is pushing them onto the crazies...
More lies and more extremist hyperbole from Joe Shmo.
But as usual, you can't refute a point I made.
Nearly every last mass shooter was able to pass a background check and get some truly devastating firepower.
Every last one of the was found to have a really nasty background of violence and mental instability when someone actually started talking to their neighbors and coworkers.
Gun control laws will always fail because criminals and especially murderers ignore laws.
Yes, the always fail... except in the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, Australia, Canada, Belgium, Holland, Norway....
You know countries were guns are illegal or restricted and they never have these kinds of incidents.
Do you think that banning murder will stop people from murdering?Apparently today is Stupid Poll Day. Not a manner of whether they will follow gun control laws or they don't --- NRA Sucker.
But if they're guilty of a felony and can't go to Armslist or any of a dozen other sites or a gun show in around 22 states and buy from an unlicensed seller .. it will make it tougher on them to find their preferred implement of destruction.
That is already a law. Do you think that banning a weapon is going to stop school shootings or what? Answer the question or GTFO.
Well, murder is banned, and murders happen every single day, so I would say NOPE. The purpose of laws against murder are to punish the murderer, not to prevent the murders. Don't be dense.
And you lost me with "mass slaughter caused by the 2nd amendment " Where does it say in the 2nd Amendment to take up arms to slaughter innocent unarmed teenagers? Where? And if t you think LIberty is a distraction, go live in North Korea where you'd fit right in.
The part where it says that "the people" can have arms, if you ignore the "Well-Regulated Militia" part.
It says that crazy people like Nikolas Cruz, Adam Lanza, Steven Paddock, James "Joker" Holmes, Omar Mateen, etc, etc, etc.. have a right to own guns, despite their history of violence or mental instability.
You're drooling again...Do you think that banning murder will stop people from murdering?Apparently today is Stupid Poll Day. Not a manner of whether they will follow gun control laws or they don't --- NRA Sucker.
But if they're guilty of a felony and can't go to Armslist or any of a dozen other sites or a gun show in around 22 states and buy from an unlicensed seller .. it will make it tougher on them to find their preferred implement of destruction.
That is already a law. Do you think that banning a weapon is going to stop school shootings or what? Answer the question or GTFO.
Well, murder is banned, and murders happen every single day, so I would say NOPE. The purpose of laws against murder are to punish the murderer, not to prevent the murders. Don't be dense.
Don't be dense
asking too much
--LOL
Criminals don't care about the law, they only care about not getting caught for breaking it.
The question I'd like to ask is, can Congress create law that infringe our right?
The answer is - NO.
There are no rights. There are only privileges society thinks you should have. Any fool who thinks he has "Rights' needs to look up "Japanese-Americans, 1942"
The real question is, will the 78% of us who don't own guns and have no use for them get sick and tired of the 3% who are stockpiling guns like the Zombies are coming? (Somewhere in between there are 18% who own maybe one gun, and aren't fanatics about it. They don't want their kids going to school with Nikolas Cruz, either.)
If they don't like guns, fine... two thirds of both houses of Congress, propose the amendment, have it ratified by three fourths of the States and amend the Constitution. Stop treating Constitution like shit by going around it.
Again, WE DON'T NEED TO DO THAT. "Well Regulated Militia". That means the government can determine who can buy a gun, what kind of gun he can own, and if he has a real need for it.
The bizarre interpretation that gun ownership was a "right" is a relatively new one.
This is a truly ignorant and idiotic post.
No one is trying to ‘disarm’ the country – this is yet another ridiculous rightwing lie.
.How do we know your not a foreign agent operating to try and disarm a country by spewing your constant bullcrap here or elsewhere for that matter upon the social media networks upon the web ???? Let me make this clear to you or anyone else whom operates like you - We won't give up our guns, and the only way we will is if they are taken from us after we are dead.
I don't have a problem with that.
The use of human carnage carried out by mentally deranged individuals isn't going to be used by Demon-crats to try and dis-arm the citizens, because it won't work. Now if the Demon-crats & republican's come up with a plan to surgically remove the gun's from the bad guy's in this country, then we are all for that, and as far as the mentally ill go, well they will be looked at for signs of their conditions, identified, and hopefully appropriate treatment will be given in each case as is needed.
But here's the problem with that. Every mass shooter was able to pass a background check. Usually they had no criminal record and their mental health history wasn't readily available.
Let's take James Holmes as an example. He was able to buy an AR-15 and a 100 round drum magazine, and it didn't raise any red flags. But if someone had talked to his school, where they were in the process of discharging him mental instability, they would have known he was nuts. The guy thought he was the Joker from the Batman comics.
Of course, once you do meaningful background checks, gun ownership isn't a "right" anymore, it becomes a privilege. A privilege that will be more and more restricted as guys slip through the cracks.
More to the point, the gun industry is based on selling to the least stable people, people who probably couldn't pass a check if people talked to their coworkers and neighbors.
Come get'em tough guy.
Tough guys don`t need guns.
Especially when they go to Safeway, Piggly Wiggly or Winn-Dixie, their mail box or while sitting in their home playing tough guy. It must suck to be paranoid all the time.
You see yourself as coming to the rescue of your homies ? You worried they can't debate their way out of the situations they get themselves into ?? Look if you sling tough guy talk, then get ready to get it back.. Joe said he wish me dead, yet you come running to his rescue. Pathetic.
Criminals don't care about the law, they only care about not getting caught for breaking it.
The question I'd like to ask is, can Congress create law that infringe our right?
The answer is - NO.
There are no rights. There are only privileges society thinks you should have. Any fool who thinks he has "Rights' needs to look up "Japanese-Americans, 1942"
The real question is, will the 78% of us who don't own guns and have no use for them get sick and tired of the 3% who are stockpiling guns like the Zombies are coming? (Somewhere in between there are 18% who own maybe one gun, and aren't fanatics about it. They don't want their kids going to school with Nikolas Cruz, either.)
If they don't like guns, fine... two thirds of both houses of Congress, propose the amendment, have it ratified by three fourths of the States and amend the Constitution. Stop treating Constitution like shit by going around it.
Again, WE DON'T NEED TO DO THAT. "Well Regulated Militia". That means the government can determine who can buy a gun, what kind of gun he can own, and if he has a real need for it.
The bizarre interpretation that gun ownership was a "right" is a relatively new one.
It seems that Bill of rights magically became Bill of Privileges, because you say so.
And how much leftists care about rights, and about the constitution can ask Japanese-Americans in 1942.
Criminals don't care about the law, they only care about not getting caught for breaking it.
The question I'd like to ask is, can Congress create law that infringe our right?
The answer is - NO.
There are no rights. There are only privileges society thinks you should have. Any fool who thinks he has "Rights' needs to look up "Japanese-Americans, 1942"
The real question is, will the 78% of us who don't own guns and have no use for them get sick and tired of the 3% who are stockpiling guns like the Zombies are coming? (Somewhere in between there are 18% who own maybe one gun, and aren't fanatics about it. They don't want their kids going to school with Nikolas Cruz, either.)
If they don't like guns, fine... two thirds of both houses of Congress, propose the amendment, have it ratified by three fourths of the States and amend the Constitution. Stop treating Constitution like shit by going around it.
Again, WE DON'T NEED TO DO THAT. "Well Regulated Militia". That means the government can determine who can buy a gun, what kind of gun he can own, and if he has a real need for it.
The bizarre interpretation that gun ownership was a "right" is a relatively new one.
It seems that Bill of rights magically became Bill of Privileges, because you say so.
And how much leftists care about rights, and about the constitution can ask Japanese-Americans in 1942.
/ I corrected my typo. And the generals would line up 100 men to fire at once. The volley could vaporize their enemies. Ever see any re-enactments of battles up through the civil war?
