Will a pedophile doom Hillary?

[BuckToothMoron]

What's your issue old man? Weiner is looking at being charged for sexting with a child and that investigation has lead to the new discovery of additional emails regarding Hellary. What gets your panties in a wad about that. It's relevant idiot.

The word pedophile is being misused for both Weiner and Biden, in the latter case, grossly misused to the point of being a total obscene lie.

What do you call sexting a 15 year old.

A teenager. Now show how smart you are and help out with that definition of what pedophile means.

So you are okay with a grown man sexting a 15 year old girl?

No, you idiot, but that is not what a pedophile is. A pedophile is a person interested in prepubescent children. A person sexually interested in teenagers is not a pedophile. Try using a dictionary once in awhile.

And where are your links that shows the definition of pedophile only applies to prepubescent children and that this child was not in fact prepubescent?

 

[Camp]

The word pedophile is being misused for both Weiner and Biden, in the latter case, grossly misused to the point of being a total obscene lie.

What do you call sexting a 15 year old.

A teenager. Now show how smart you are and help out with that definition of what pedophile means.

So you are okay with a grown man sexting a 15 year old girl?

No, you idiot, but that is not what a pedophile is. A pedophile is a person interested in prepubescent children. A person sexually interested in teenagers is not a pedophile. Try using a dictionary once in awhile.

And where are your links that shows the definition of pedophile only applies to prepubescent children and that this child was not in fact prepubescent?

You used a simple, abbreviated and incomplete definition. Anyone can look up the complete definition and see that it means prepubescent children. Now you are arguing that a 15-year-old is not prepubescent. That is because you know the real definition.

 

[jknowgood]

What do you call sexting a 15 year old.

A teenager. Now show how smart you are and help out with that definition of what pedophile means.

So you are okay with a grown man sexting a 15 year old girl?

No, you idiot, but that is not what a pedophile is. A pedophile is a person interested in prepubescent children. A person sexually interested in teenagers is not a pedophile. Try using a dictionary once in awhile.

And where are your links that shows the definition of pedophile only applies to prepubescent children and that this child was not in fact prepubescent?

You used a simple, abbreviated and incomplete definition. Anyone can look up the complete definition and see that it means prepubescent children. Now you are arguing that a 15-year-old is not prepubescent. That is because you know the real definition.

A 15 year old is still a child.

 

[Lakhota]

Will a pedophile doom Hillary?

You mean Trump? Possibly...

Trump lawyers given court date over lawsuit alleging rape of 13-year-old girl

 

[Rozman]

Trump responds to Weiner pic....

I'm this big compared to little Anthony....

 

[Camp]

A teenager. Now show how smart you are and help out with that definition of what pedophile means.

So you are okay with a grown man sexting a 15 year old girl?

No, you idiot, but that is not what a pedophile is. A pedophile is a person interested in prepubescent children. A person sexually interested in teenagers is not a pedophile. Try using a dictionary once in awhile.

And where are your links that shows the definition of pedophile only applies to prepubescent children and that this child was not in fact prepubescent?

You used a simple, abbreviated and incomplete definition. Anyone can look up the complete definition and see that it means prepubescent children. Now you are arguing that a 15-year-old is not prepubescent. That is because you know the real definition.

A 15 year old is still a child.

Of course. it is. The argument here is whether to use the scientific and medical term for a pedophile or an abbreviated incomplete one and whether the agenda is to be accurate or to promote an inaccurate political agenda one.

 

[Rozman]

Please don't let Ivanka see this....

 

[deltex1]

View attachment 95699 Isnt it interesting how things sometimes workout. Hillary has spent her career defending her husband because of his sexual proclivities, destroying the lives of women who dared to speak about his actions, and now, within days of winning her most coveted position, a perverted pedophile may be her undoing. Anthony "wanna see my" Weiner is being investigated for sexting a 15 year old child, and could be charged with Sexual Exploitation of a child. Justice can be served in the most ironic ways.

Here Are the Charges Anthony Weiner Could Face if He’s Indicted for Sexting a 15-Year-Old

Finally Hillary will doom Hillary....long overdue....long deserved. The chickens may gave finally found the roost. Bubba will get free rein on the NY property...open him up a charitable whore house for aging perverts.

 

[jknowgood]

So you are okay with a grown man sexting a 15 year old girl?

No, you idiot, but that is not what a pedophile is. A pedophile is a person interested in prepubescent children. A person sexually interested in teenagers is not a pedophile. Try using a dictionary once in awhile.

And where are your links that shows the definition of pedophile only applies to prepubescent children and that this child was not in fact prepubescent?

You used a simple, abbreviated and incomplete definition. Anyone can look up the complete definition and see that it means prepubescent children. Now you are arguing that a 15-year-old is not prepubescent. That is because you know the real definition.

A 15 year old is still a child.

Of course. it is. The argument here is whether to use the scientific and medical term for a pedophile or an abbreviated incomplete one and whether the agenda is to be accurate or to promote an inaccurate political agenda one.

Whatever you call it, he should go to jail.

 

[Grizz]

So you are okay with a grown man sexting a 15 year old girl?

No, you idiot, but that is not what a pedophile is. A pedophile is a person interested in prepubescent children. A person sexually interested in teenagers is not a pedophile. Try using a dictionary once in awhile.

And where are your links that shows the definition of pedophile only applies to prepubescent children and that this child was not in fact prepubescent?

You used a simple, abbreviated and incomplete definition. Anyone can look up the complete definition and see that it means prepubescent children. Now you are arguing that a 15-year-old is not prepubescent. That is because you know the real definition.

A 15 year old is still a child.

Of course. it is. The argument here is whether to use the scientific and medical term for a pedophile or an abbreviated incomplete one and whether the agenda is to be accurate or to promote an inaccurate political agenda one.

Actually the argument here is not about semantics, it's about real, live children being subjected to predatory behavior by older people.
The sad truth is this, you cannot even bring yourself to condemn the behavior.
This is the sad truth of the American Left, there is no deviancy that they will condemn as long as it is a voting block that supports them.
You are disgusting son.

 

[Camp]

No, you idiot, but that is not what a pedophile is. A pedophile is a person interested in prepubescent children. A person sexually interested in teenagers is not a pedophile. Try using a dictionary once in awhile.

And where are your links that shows the definition of pedophile only applies to prepubescent children and that this child was not in fact prepubescent?

You used a simple, abbreviated and incomplete definition. Anyone can look up the complete definition and see that it means prepubescent children. Now you are arguing that a 15-year-old is not prepubescent. That is because you know the real definition.

A 15 year old is still a child.

Of course. it is. The argument here is whether to use the scientific and medical term for a pedophile or an abbreviated incomplete one and whether the agenda is to be accurate or to promote an inaccurate political agenda one.

Actually the argument here is not about semantics, it's about real, live children being subjected to predatory behavior by older people.
The sad truth is this, you cannot even bring yourself to condemn the behavior.
This is the sad truth of the American Left, there is no deviancy that they will condemn as long as it is a voting block that supports them.
You are disgusting son.

The use of proper language and specifically accepted definitions is not a question of semantics. The word pedophile has specific meaning as a definitive word in both the medical and legal sense. And your claim that I have not personally condemned predatory behavior is inaccurate. Note that the very quote you use to respond to, acknowledges that a 15-year-olds is still a child. I have no problem with condemning and punishing perverts and child molesters. I have a problem with the dumbing down of Americans, and the misuse of definitions or making up new definitions to fit a person's lack of education or refusal to improve their knowledge is dumbing down.

 

[Norman]

A weiner has demolished her... a fitting end to the sex baiting campaign of hers.

 

[jknowgood]

No, you idiot, but that is not what a pedophile is. A pedophile is a person interested in prepubescent children. A person sexually interested in teenagers is not a pedophile. Try using a dictionary once in awhile.

And where are your links that shows the definition of pedophile only applies to prepubescent children and that this child was not in fact prepubescent?

You used a simple, abbreviated and incomplete definition. Anyone can look up the complete definition and see that it means prepubescent children. Now you are arguing that a 15-year-old is not prepubescent. That is because you know the real definition.

A 15 year old is still a child.

Of course. it is. The argument here is whether to use the scientific and medical term for a pedophile or an abbreviated incomplete one and whether the agenda is to be accurate or to promote an inaccurate political agenda one.

Actually the argument here is not about semantics, it's about real, live children being subjected to predatory behavior by older people.
The sad truth is this, you cannot even bring yourself to condemn the behavior.
This is the sad truth of the American Left, there is no deviancy that they will condemn as long as it is a voting block that supports them.
You are disgusting son.

You can get away with it only if you are a liberal.

 

[jknowgood]

And where are your links that shows the definition of pedophile only applies to prepubescent children and that this child was not in fact prepubescent?

You used a simple, abbreviated and incomplete definition. Anyone can look up the complete definition and see that it means prepubescent children. Now you are arguing that a 15-year-old is not prepubescent. That is because you know the real definition.

A 15 year old is still a child.

Of course. it is. The argument here is whether to use the scientific and medical term for a pedophile or an abbreviated incomplete one and whether the agenda is to be accurate or to promote an inaccurate political agenda one.

Actually the argument here is not about semantics, it's about real, live children being subjected to predatory behavior by older people.
The sad truth is this, you cannot even bring yourself to condemn the behavior.
This is the sad truth of the American Left, there is no deviancy that they will condemn as long as it is a voting block that supports them.
You are disgusting son.

The use of proper language and specifically accepted definitions is not a question of semantics. The word pedophile has specific meaning as a definitive word in both the medical and legal sense. And your claim that I have not personally condemned predatory behavior is inaccurate. Note that the very quote you use to respond to, acknowledges that a 15-year-olds is still a child. I have no problem with condemning and punishing perverts and child molesters. I have a problem with the dumbing down of Americans, and the misuse of definitions or making up new definitions to fit a person's lack of education or refusal to improve their knowledge is dumbing down.

Okay then you admit he is a child molester?