Will 9/11 inside job ever answer my questions?

[eots]

the first-responders were speaking about concrete and building contents not steel core columns ..you moron

 

[eots]

troofers are good at herp a derp

Color me naive, but I never thought I would find one that makes Chri$$y look like a genius.

Until today.

With all phony movements truthers like the climate change everything proves the conspiracy, It just grows and grows .In real fact finding there are things that disprove theories.
Those things are called facts and evidence.

Those are deflected with red herrings and strawmen to keep the conspiracy alive.
For example:
Jet fuels burns at temperatures sufficient to weaken iron so it undergoes transition.
Truthers go all in with jet fuel cannot create molten steel.


Yours truly @ near free fall speed.( a meaningess phrase)

splitting hairs over seconds is what is meaningless...there are many reports of molten steel...yet NIST found ZERO forensic evidence of the predicted temperatures required to cause structural failure...these are the facts

 

[SFC Ollie]

Color me naive, but I never thought I would find one that makes Chri$$y look like a genius.

Until today.

With all phony movements truthers like the climate change everything proves the conspiracy, It just grows and grows .In real fact finding there are things that disprove theories.
Those things are called facts and evidence.

Those are deflected with red herrings and strawmen to keep the conspiracy alive.
For example:
Jet fuels burns at temperatures sufficient to weaken iron so it undergoes transition.
Truthers go all in with jet fuel cannot create molten steel.


Yours truly @ near free fall speed.( a meaningess phrase)

splitting hairs over seconds is what is meaningless...there are many reports of molten steel...yet NIST found ZERO forensic evidence of the predicted temperatures required to cause structural failure...these are the facts

Can you find anyone who has any of that molten steel?

 

[Gamolon]

the first-responders were speaking about concrete and building contents not steel core columns ..you moron

Not too bright are you.

Two things.

First, paper, gypsum planking, and the like ARE building contents you dumbass.

Second, how can a destructive force be selective in what it pulverizes? Let's see, all concrete was pulverized yet this destructive force left paper, gypsum planking, a doll, Warner Bros figures, keys, and many other items untouched.



That weed is effecting your thought process.

 

[Gamolon]

splitting hairs over seconds is what is meaningless...there are many reports of molten steel...yet NIST found ZERO forensic evidence of the predicted temperatures required to cause structural failure...these are the facts

Let's see the forensic proof that it was molten steel jackass.

 

[eots]

the first-responders were speaking about concrete and building contents not steel core columns ..you moron

Not too bright are you.

Two things.

First, paper, gypsum planking, and the like are building contents you dumbass.

Second, how can a destructive force be selective in what it pulverizes? Let's see, all concrete was pulverized yet this destructive force left paper, gypsum planking, a doll, warner bros figures, keys, and many other items untouched.



That weed is effecting your thought process.

so your false belife is that in an explosion when majority f a structure is pulverised ... Some small items can not remain intact

 

[eots]

splitting hairs over seconds is what is meaningless...there are many reports of molten steel...yet nist found zero forensic evidence of the predicted temperatures required to cause structural failure...these are the facts

let's see the forensic proof that it was molten steel jackass.

dont you think in would be incumbent on nist to show forensic evidence of tempatures predicted as required for structural failure

 

[eots]

with all phony movements truthers like the climate change everything proves the conspiracy, it just grows and grows .in real fact finding there are things that disprove theories.
Those things are called facts and evidence.

Those are deflected with red herrings and strawmen to keep the conspiracy alive.
For example:
Jet fuels burns at temperatures sufficient to weaken iron so it undergoes transition.
Truthers go all in with jet fuel cannot create molten steel.


Yours truly @ near free fall speed.( a meaningess phrase)

splitting hairs over seconds is what is meaningless...there are many reports of molten steel...yet nist found zero forensic evidence of the predicted temperatures required to cause structural failure...these are the facts

can you find anyone who has any of that molten steel?

all evidence was destroyed or is stored and classifed...you know that

 

[Gamolon]

the first-responders were speaking about concrete and building contents not steel core columns ..you moron

Not too bright are you.

Two things.

First, paper, gypsum planking, and the like are building contents you dumbass.

Second, how can a destructive force be selective in what it pulverizes? Let's see, all concrete was pulverized yet this destructive force left paper, gypsum planking, a doll, warner bros figures, keys, and many other items untouched.



That weed is effecting your thought process.

so your false belife is that in an explosion when majority f a structure is pulverised ... Some small items can not remain intact

Wow. You HAVE to be smoking something.

The guys in your video said that EVERYTHING was pulverized. No desk, computer screens, etc. You said the concrete was pulverized.

So now after calling you on your EVERYTHING being pulverized claim, you start backpedaling like a pussy. Now it's NOT everything, but almost everything?

So. How did EVERYTHING, per the guys description that there was only a few fragments of office contents, get pulverized yet I can find pictures of a doll, papers, statues, gypsum wallboard, etc. all over the place?

 

[Gamolon]

splitting hairs over seconds is what is meaningless...there are many reports of molten steel...yet nist found zero forensic evidence of the predicted temperatures required to cause structural failure...these are the facts

let's see the forensic proof that it was molten steel jackass.

dont you think in would be incumbent on nist to show forensic evidence of tempatures predicted as required for structural failure

What you don't seem to get is that I'm calling YOU out on how you determine what you believe. You ask for forensic evidence backing the official story claims in order for you to believe it, but you don't apply those same rules to your claims against.

Case in point. Molten steel. I'm using the same conditions you are. Where is the forensic evidence for molten steel that you have to make your claim?

 

[Gamolon]

splitting hairs over seconds is what is meaningless...there are many reports of molten steel...yet nist found zero forensic evidence of the predicted temperatures required to cause structural failure...these are the facts

let's see the forensic proof that it was molten steel jackass.

dont you think in would be incumbent on nist to show forensic evidence of tempatures predicted as required for structural failure

Don't you think that the people accusing government officials and anyone else involved in this massive cover-up of the murder of 3,000 innocent people need forensic evidence to back their claims?

Or is it sufficient in your pathetic little world you reside in to make these claims and believe them?

Where is the forensic evidence of molten steel? What evidence do you have that proves it was molten steel?

 

[Gamolon]

but for those that think ,the manner and speed the towers collapsed at raises many question and explanation

Being that you're one of those that think, why should they have collapsed differently and slower? What other comparative scenarios match that of the towers that makes your case?

 

[SFC Ollie]

Actually Eots most of the debris was taken to Fresh Kills landfill where it was gone through by hand. And hundreds of samples of the steel were taken and tested. The results have all been published, you simply don't believe them.

 

[eots]

Actually Eots most of the debris was taken to Fresh Kills landfill where it was gone through by hand. And hundreds of samples of the steel were taken and tested. The results have all been published, you simply don't believe them.

bull shit it was...there are two hundred steel samples in total from all three buildings and none of those samples show evidence of anything close to what is predicted as required for structural failure

 

[eots]

but for those that think ,the manner and speed the towers collapsed at raises many question and explanation

Being that you're one of those that think, why should they have collapsed differently and slower? What other comparative scenarios match that of the towers that makes your case?

resistance would not allow for a near free fall collapse..uneven damage..uneven fires do not create symmetrical controlled collapses..this is evident in all buildings that ever collapsed through means other than controlled demolition

 

[eots]

let's see the forensic proof that it was molten steel jackass.

dont you think in would be incumbent on nist to show forensic evidence of tempatures predicted as required for structural failure

Don't you think that the people accusing government officials and anyone else involved in this massive cover-up of the murder of 3,000 innocent people need forensic evidence to back their claims?

Or is it sufficient in your pathetic little world you reside in to make these claims and believe them?

Where is the forensic evidence of molten steel? What evidence do you have that proves it was molten steel?

there is only wittiness testimony as the perpetrators have control of the evidence..however
it is there theory..so it is required they show that the temperatures they theorize as required to cause failure actually existed

 

[SFC Ollie]

" A total of 236 recovered pieces of WTC steel were cataloged; the great majority belonging to the towers, WTC 1 and WTC 2. These samples represented a quarter to half a percent of the 200,000 tons of structural steel used in the construction of the two towers. The NIST inventory included pieces from the impact and fire regions, perimeter columns, core columns, floor trusses, and other pieces such as truss seats and wind dampers. The original, as-built locations of 42 recovered perimeter panels and 12 recovered core columns were determined, based on markings and geometry of the columns. Samples were available of all 12 strength levels of perimeter panel steel, the two strength levels of the core column steel that represented 99 percent
of the total number of columns, and both strength levels used in the floor trusses.
A number of structural pieces were recovered from locations in or near the impact- and fire-damaged regions of the towers, including four perimeter panels directly hit by the airplane and three core columns located within these areas. These pieces provided opportunity for failure and other forensic analyses. The collection of steel from the WTC towers was sufficient for determining the quality of the steel and, in combination with published literature, for determining mechanical properties as input to models of
building performance."

"Extensive failure analysis of the recovered steel was conducted to determine damage characteristics, failure modes, and fire-related degradation of the recovered structural components. In addition, precollapse photographic evidence of the impact damage and location and intensity of the fires was used to distinguish between pre- and post-collapse damage."

"In addition to the NIST analysis, an outside contractor made an independent study of the recovered steel elements. In general, the observations concerning local failure mechanisms by the contractor agreed with those that NIST found."


http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NCSTAR1-3ExecutiveSummary.pdf


What more is needed?

And let us not forget that the U S S New York was partially built from steel from the towers.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

there is only wittiness testimony as the perpetrators have control of the evidence..however
it is there theory..so it is required they show that the temperatures they theorize as required to cause failure actually existed

What type of metal do you think was used in the towers?

 

[eots]

" a total of 236 recovered pieces of wtc steel were cataloged; the great majority belonging to the towers, wtc 1 and wtc 2. These samples represented a quarter to half a percent of the 200,000 tons of structural steel used in the construction of the two towers. The nist inventory included pieces from the impact and fire regions, perimeter columns, core columns, floor trusses, and other pieces such as truss seats and wind dampers. The original, as-built locations of 42 recovered perimeter panels and 12 recovered core columns were determined, based on markings and geometry of the columns. Samples were available of all 12 strength levels of perimeter panel steel, the two strength levels of the core column steel that represented 99 percent
of the total number of columns, and both strength levels used in the floor trusses.
A number of structural pieces were recovered from locations in or near the impact- and fire-damaged regions of the towers, including four perimeter panels directly hit by the airplane and three core columns located within these areas. These pieces provided opportunity for failure and other forensic analyses. The collection of steel from the wtc towers was sufficient for determining the quality of the steel and, in combination with published literature, for determining mechanical properties as input to models of
building performance."

"extensive failure analysis of the recovered steel was conducted to determine damage characteristics, failure modes, and fire-related degradation of the recovered structural components. In addition, precollapse photographic evidence of the impact damage and location and intensity of the fires was used to distinguish between pre- and post-collapse damage."

"in addition to the nist analysis, an outside contractor made an independent study of the recovered steel elements. In general, the observations concerning local failure mechanisms by the contractor agreed with those that nist found."


http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/ncstar1-3executivesummary.pdf


what more is needed?

And let us not forget that the u s s new york was partially built from steel from the towers.

no... Lets not forget that only two hundred pieces were kept and the rest destroyed and that almost no steel from wtc 7 was saved....lets not forget you are full of shit that the debris was gone through by hand

lets not forget in the steel tested temperatures required or failure were not evident

 

[Gamolon]

but for those that think ,the manner and speed the towers collapsed at raises many question and explanation

Being that you're one of those that think, why should they have collapsed differently and slower? What other comparative scenarios match that of the towers that makes your case?

resistance would not allow for a near free fall collapse..uneven damage..uneven fires do not create symmetrical controlled collapses..this is evident in all buildings that ever collapsed through means other than controlled demolition

Hmmm.

So you're saying that all buildings, no matter how they are designed, will collapse exactly the same when forces other than controlled demolition are used?

Is that correct eots?