- Aug 18, 2009
- 12,484
- 2,651
- 245
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And 2000 & 2001 were Clinton's.
That chart is dishonest ... the 2009 budget is Bush's.
That chart is dishonest ... the 2009 budget is Bush's.
That chart is dishonest ... the 2009 budget is Bush's.
Wrong einstien. That was the budget democrats would not let bush sign because it did not contain enough spending. They held it over for obama to sign. And before you throw a fit on being exposed, no not the entire budget was with held. Thanks for playing.
That chart is dishonest ... the 2009 budget is Bush's.
Wrong einstien. That was the budget democrats would not let bush sign because it did not contain enough spending. They held it over for obama to sign. And before you throw a fit on being exposed, no not the entire budget was with held. Thanks for playing.
How much of the $410 billion you are talking about was the extra the Dems were holding out for?
Deficits were in decline in the 2000s until Democrats controlled Congress in 2007.
Wrong einstien. That was the budget democrats would not let bush sign because it did not contain enough spending. They held it over for obama to sign. And before you throw a fit on being exposed, no not the entire budget was with held. Thanks for playing.
How much of the $410 billion you are talking about was the extra the Dems were holding out for?
You tell us, as it went to obamas desk. Gw threatened to veto. Shooting your spending rant to hell.
Deficits were in decline in the 2000s until Democrats controlled Congress in 2007.
Absolutely and utterly false.
Bush put 2 wars on emergency supplemental spending. It wasn't included as part of the general budget.
Accounting tricks were all over the Bush administration.