Why Wasn’t Biden’s Location raided by the FBI?

[scruffy]

Because when they found them, they notified the justice department and returned the material so there was no need for multiple subpoenas and a raid.

Sheeple. ^^^

Lawyers found the documents in Biden's archives.

Who found the ones in his garage?

 

[SC Patriot]

No, you haven’t got it. This isn’t murder.

OK.
Fair enough.

So one who robs 20 convenience stores is not as bad as one who robs 200 convenience stores.

Need to say....that was one poor response by you.

 

[Nostra]

Yup.


Are saying you didn’t say it?

Anything coherent to add to the thread, Troll?

 

[BlindBoo]

And…since when are 20 documents considered troves?

If the Neo-GOP didn't have hyperbole they wouldn't have any talking points at all!

 

[Nostra]

And…since when are 20 documents considered troves?

Hey stupid, there is a difference between a page and a document. Documents can be thousands of pages.

You are a colossal idiot.

 

[Delldude]

Then Trump made magic happen He declassified them in his mind

Biden tried it but came up short on the mind thing.......

 

[Delldude]

Why does the Federalist not ask the most relevant legal question about intent?

Just have to wait and speculate.

Tell me about Biden's 'intent' to possessing classified documents for 6 or so years, and suddenly has a epiphany over holding TS/SCI level doc's?

Wake up, dude, Biden is being put to pasture by his own party.

 

[JoeB131]

OK.
Fair enough.

So one who robs 20 convenience stores is not as bad as one who robs 200 convenience stores.

Need to say....that was one poor response by you.

Actually, it's more like intent.

It's more like the guy who got the wrong change from a convenience store realizing it, and returning them money the next day vs. the guy who robbed the convenience store and then has a shoot-out with the clerk.

Biden's possession of the documents was inadvertent. Trump's possession was intentional.
A key element to charging someone with a crime is "Criminal Intent" or "Mens Rea".

 

[SC Patriot]

Actually, it's more like intent.

It's more like the guy who got the wrong change from a convenience store realizing it, and returning them money the next day vs. the guy who robbed the convenience store and then has a shoot-out with the clerk.

Biden's possession of the documents was inadvertent. Trump's possession was intentional.
A key element to charging someone with a crime is "Criminal Intent" or "Mens Rea".

Actually, criminal intent comes into play as it pertains to the severity of the charges.....such as, for example, involuntary manslaughter.

Furthermore, if you mishandle classified information, regardless of intent, you are liable for charges.

And finally, the difference between Trump and Biden is Trump agreed he had the docs within months of leaving office and was in discussions as to which were declassified.

Biden had the documents for 6 years and told no one.

 

[JoeB131]

Actually, criminal intent comes into play as it pertains to the severity of the charges.....such as, for example, involuntary manslaughter.

Furthermore, if you mishandle classified information, regardless of intent, you are liable for charges.

So by your "logic", whoever delivered those sealed boxes to Biden home or office is "liable".

Wait... logic doesn't play into right wing thinking.

 

[SC Patriot]

So by your "logic", whoever delivered those sealed boxes to Biden home or office is "liable".

Wait... logic doesn't play into right wing thinking.

Yeah. Ok. Sounds like a plan.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Pence too

It's all predictable. Too much is easily marked

but with Trump? He lied, he obstructed (yet again), and he refused to cooperate