Why was President Clinton impeached?

Why was President Clinton impeached?

Lying under oath. It doesn't matter why, or for what.

Funny. Why should a president be placed in such a position regarding personal sexual indiscretions that have nothing to do with national security or abuse of power?

Because he opens himself up to blackmail. Definitely national security.

Imagine if she had been a porn star.
she wasn't
 
There was no reason for him to go under oath in the first place.

and Ken Starr , he was such a hypocrite in tramps defense team. I mean according to him, impeachment should be null and void, after he investigated Clinton since he became Potus. He led the impeachment against the Potus who had a consensual affair.
Sure there was. He was the defendant in a civil lawsuit. They are always subject to testifying under oath.
 
The blunt answer is for lying about receiving blowjobs from a consenting adult not his wife. How many married men would want to publicly announce that to the world? In fact, some of the same Congressmen who impeached President Clinton were exposed as also having adulterous affairs with women not their wives. That is why I find it so hypocritical when I hear someone like Ken Starr (who prosecuted President Clinton) defending Trump*. Lying about blowjobs is not the same as jeopardizing our national security to rig a presidential election. That is also why I find it extremely hypocritical when I hear Trump* supporters talking about "payback" for impeaching Trump*. If anything, Democrats deserve some "payback" for what Ken Starr did to President Clinton. However, the Trump* impeachment is not about "payback". The Trump* impeachment is about exactly what the House impeached him for: Abuse of power and Obstruction of Congress. In short - for trying to rig the 2020 presidential election.

Trump thought about withholding the aid, but didn't.

Clinton didn't withhold, which is how we ended up with the blue dress.

Trump did withhold aid, dope.
 
The blunt answer is for lying about receiving blowjobs from a consenting adult not his wife. How many married men would want to publicly announce that to the world? In fact, some of the same Congressmen who impeached President Clinton were exposed as also having adulterous affairs with women not their wives. That is why I find it so hypocritical when I hear someone like Ken Starr (who prosecuted President Clinton) defending Trump*. Lying about blowjobs is not the same as jeopardizing our national security to rig a presidential election. That is also why I find it extremely hypocritical when I hear Trump* supporters talking about "payback" for impeaching Trump*. If anything, Democrats deserve some "payback" for what Ken Starr did to President Clinton. However, the Trump* impeachment is not about "payback". The Trump* impeachment is about exactly what the House impeached him for: Abuse of power and Obstruction of Congress. In short - for trying to rig the 2020 presidential election.

Trump thought about withholding the aid, but didn't.

Clinton didn't withhold, which is how we ended up with the blue dress.

Trump did withhold aid, dope.
then how did Ukraine get it?
 
The blunt answer is for lying about receiving blowjobs from a consenting adult not his wife. How many married men would want to publicly announce that to the world? In fact, some of the same Congressmen who impeached President Clinton were exposed as also having adulterous affairs with women not their wives. That is why I find it so hypocritical when I hear someone like Ken Starr (who prosecuted President Clinton) defending Trump*. Lying about blowjobs is not the same as jeopardizing our national security to rig a presidential election. That is also why I find it extremely hypocritical when I hear Trump* supporters talking about "payback" for impeaching Trump*. If anything, Democrats deserve some "payback" for what Ken Starr did to President Clinton. However, the Trump* impeachment is not about "payback". The Trump* impeachment is about exactly what the House impeached him for: Abuse of power and Obstruction of Congress. In short - for trying to rig the 2020 presidential election.

Trump thought about withholding the aid, but didn't.

Clinton didn't withhold, which is how we ended up with the blue dress.

Trump did withhold aid, dope.
then how did Ukraine get it?

They released it, dope. It took an act of congress to get it done. Some of the aid was lost due to the hold.

Good job.:thup:
 
The blunt answer is for lying about receiving blowjobs from a consenting adult not his wife. How many married men would want to publicly announce that to the world? In fact, some of the same Congressmen who impeached President Clinton were exposed as also having adulterous affairs with women not their wives. That is why I find it so hypocritical when I hear someone like Ken Starr (who prosecuted President Clinton) defending Trump*. Lying about blowjobs is not the same as jeopardizing our national security to rig a presidential election. That is also why I find it extremely hypocritical when I hear Trump* supporters talking about "payback" for impeaching Trump*. If anything, Democrats deserve some "payback" for what Ken Starr did to President Clinton. However, the Trump* impeachment is not about "payback". The Trump* impeachment is about exactly what the House impeached him for: Abuse of power and Obstruction of Congress. In short - for trying to rig the 2020 presidential election.

Trump thought about withholding the aid, but didn't.

Clinton didn't withhold, which is how we ended up with the blue dress.

Trump did withhold aid, dope.
then how did Ukraine get it?

They released it, dope. It took an act of congress to get it done. Some of the aid was lost due to the hold.

Good job.:thup:
was it on time?
 
The blunt answer is for lying about receiving blowjobs from a consenting adult not his wife. How many married men would want to publicly announce that to the world? In fact, some of the same Congressmen who impeached President Clinton were exposed as also having adulterous affairs with women not their wives. That is why I find it so hypocritical when I hear someone like Ken Starr (who prosecuted President Clinton) defending Trump*. Lying about blowjobs is not the same as jeopardizing our national security to rig a presidential election. That is also why I find it extremely hypocritical when I hear Trump* supporters talking about "payback" for impeaching Trump*. If anything, Democrats deserve some "payback" for what Ken Starr did to President Clinton. However, the Trump* impeachment is not about "payback". The Trump* impeachment is about exactly what the House impeached him for: Abuse of power and Obstruction of Congress. In short - for trying to rig the 2020 presidential election.

Trump thought about withholding the aid, but didn't.

Clinton didn't withhold, which is how we ended up with the blue dress.

Trump did withhold aid, dope.
then how did Ukraine get it?

They released it, dope. It took an act of congress to get it done. Some of the aid was lost due to the hold.

Good job.:thup:
was it on time?

No.
 
Trump thought about withholding the aid, but didn't.

Clinton didn't withhold, which is how we ended up with the blue dress.

Trump did withhold aid, dope.
then how did Ukraine get it?

They released it, dope. It took an act of congress to get it done. Some of the aid was lost due to the hold.

Good job.:thup:
was it on time?

No.
sure it was. it was due in September. thanks for playing.
 
The blunt answer is for lying about receiving blowjobs from a consenting adult not his wife. How many married men would want to publicly announce that to the world? In fact, some of the same Congress members who impeached President Clinton were exposed as also having adulterous affairs with women not their wives. That is why I find it so hypocritical when I hear someone like Ken Starr (who prosecuted President Clinton) defending Trump*. Lying about blowjobs is not the same as jeopardizing our national security to rig a presidential election. That is also why I find it extremely hypocritical when I hear Trump* supporters talking about "payback" for impeaching Trump*. If anything, Democrats deserve some "payback" for what Ken Starr did to President Clinton. However, the Trump* impeachment is not about "payback". The Trump* impeachment about exactly what the House impeached him for: Abuse of power and Obstruction of Congress. In short - for trying to rig the 2020 presidential election.

That's OK Clinton was already a draft dodging coward and a huge asshole before he victimized the White House aide.
Your guy is a draft dodger...
 
The blunt answer is for lying about receiving blowjobs from a consenting adult not his wife. How many married men would want to publicly announce that to the world? In fact, some of the same Congress members who impeached President Clinton were exposed as also having adulterous affairs with women not their wives. That is why I find it so hypocritical when I hear someone like Ken Starr (who prosecuted President Clinton) defending Trump*. Lying about blowjobs is not the same as jeopardizing our national security to rig a presidential election. That is also why I find it extremely hypocritical when I hear Trump* supporters talking about "payback" for impeaching Trump*. If anything, Democrats deserve some "payback" for what Ken Starr did to President Clinton. However, the Trump* impeachment is not about "payback". The Trump* impeachment about exactly what the House impeached him for: Abuse of power and Obstruction of Congress. In short - for trying to rig the 2020 presidential election.

That's OK Clinton was already a draft dodging coward and a huge asshole before he victimized the White House aide.
Your guy is a draft dodger...
All of those taboos have been crossed.
 
Why was President Clinton impeached?

He committed perjury, a federal crime, you stupid braindead bitch. People are in federal prison for perjury, and thats where your rapist Clinton should have gone too.

But the corrupt Democrat rodents in the Senate voted him not guilty even though he was guilty. He lost his law license for that to in case you forgot, you dope.

Thats Democrats for you:
If a Democrat is guilty they vote him not guilty.
If a Republican is innocent they vote him guilty.

Now fuck off
 
The blunt answer is for lying about receiving blowjobs from a consenting adult not his wife...
He was caught committing several felonies. Clinton flat-out perjured himself, repeatedly, each offense a separate felony, which no one disputed.

In addition to his perjury, Clinton was guilty of obstruction of justice. He arranged for Lewinsky to give a false affidavit to the Jones lawyers denying the relationship in order to avoid being deposed. Clinton sent Betty Currie to pick up from Lewinsky the gifts he had given her, in order to keep this evidence safe from a subpoena.

As a result, Though he was not removed as his crimes did not rise to the level of removal, he was disbarred by his home state and stripped by the Supreme Court of his privilege of ever arguing a case before them.
That is why I find it so hypocritical when I hear someone like Ken Starr (who prosecuted President Clinton) defending Trump*. Lying about blowjobs is not the same as jeopardizing our national security to rig a presidential election.
Ken Starr did not Write the Special Counsel Statute that REQUIRED him to report to Congress the crimes Clinton had committed. Ken Starr also did not sign into law the extension of the Special Counsel Statute, Bill Clinton did.
... That is also why I find it extremely hypocritical when I hear Trump* supporters talking about "payback" for impeaching Trump*. ..
This is not the consensus position of nationally elected Republicans, if you claim it is you are fabricating.
... The Trump* impeachment is about exactly what the House impeached him for: Abuse of power and Obstruction of Congress...
Obstruction of JUSTICE is a crime, The Crazed House tried to make up a crime and failed miserable.

If Clinton cold not be removed after going on a felony spree, clearly Trump was not going to be removed with no crimes at all.

I was initially surprised that Democrats even attempted this, but then I remembered that they completely lost their minds on election night 2016
 
Clinton was a bad boy.

The congress should have spanked his blow job happy ass....and gotten on with things.

Impeachment was stupid.
 
Why was President Clinton impeached?

He committed perjury, a federal crime, you stupid braindead bitch. People are in federal prison for perjury, and thats where your rapist Clinton should have gone too.

But the corrupt Democrat rodents in the Senate voted him not guilty even though he was guilty. He lost his law license for that to in case you forgot, you dope.

Thats Democrats for you:
If a Democrat is guilty they vote him not guilty.
If a Republican is innocent they vote him guilty.

Now fuck off

The last line.....
 

Forum List

Back
Top