Why socialism fails

[Rustic]

Socialism is the step to Communism. Quote from Karl Marx.

And Communism is the step to Capitalism.
Quote from Karl Marx.

Karl Marx was as dumb as a bag of hammers, he lived in a world of delusional stupidity.

These same folks often quote Krugman as well. That' all you need to know.

Krugman is a dolt...

Krugman keeps a keen eye on excessive off-shoring of White Collar careers and Business Visas.

...and he's clueless

 

[Rustic]

Socialism is the step to Communism. Quote from Karl Marx.

And Communism is the step to Capitalism.
Quote from Karl Marx.

Karl Marx was as dumb as a bag of hammers, he lived in a world of delusional stupidity.

He lives Royalty and Serfdom and you have no idea that Marxism does not equal Communism.
Communism is 1 of 3 phases that he explains cycle from one to the other.

All the same difference, a bunch of dumbass control freaks all of them...

Pure Capitalism becomes Royalty/Serfdom.
All extremes are dangerous.

Socialism is extremist behavior...

 

[Indeependent]

And Communism is the step to Capitalism.
Quote from Karl Marx.

Karl Marx was as dumb as a bag of hammers, he lived in a world of delusional stupidity.

He lives Royalty and Serfdom and you have no idea that Marxism does not equal Communism.
Communism is 1 of 3 phases that he explains cycle from one to the other.

All the same difference, a bunch of dumbass control freaks all of them...

Pure Capitalism becomes Royalty/Serfdom.
All extremes are dangerous.

Socialism is extremist behavior...

You must have a shitload of stock.

 

[Indeependent]

And Communism is the step to Capitalism.
Quote from Karl Marx.

Karl Marx was as dumb as a bag of hammers, he lived in a world of delusional stupidity.

These same folks often quote Krugman as well. That' all you need to know.

Krugman is a dolt...

Krugman keeps a keen eye on excessive off-shoring of White Collar careers and Business Visas.

...and he's clueless

In terms of Marx's theory you're clueless.
He was not a fan of any particular phase.

 

[Rustic]

Karl Marx was as dumb as a bag of hammers, he lived in a world of delusional stupidity.

These same folks often quote Krugman as well. That' all you need to know.

Krugman is a dolt...

Krugman keeps a keen eye on excessive off-shoring of White Collar careers and Business Visas.

...and he's clueless

In terms of Marx's theory you're clueless.
He was not a fan of any particular phase.

Marx's theory whatever phase has proven to be an failure...
Lol

 

[Indeependent]

These same folks often quote Krugman as well. That' all you need to know.

Krugman is a dolt...

Krugman keeps a keen eye on excessive off-shoring of White Collar careers and Business Visas.

...and he's clueless

In terms of Marx's theory you're clueless.
He was not a fan of any particular phase.

Marx's theory whatever phase has proven to be an failure...
Lol

Please tell me you're not as dumb as that posting.

 

[francoHFW]

Same difference, dumbasses believe in horse shit that is socialism.
Lol

and you think is communism...against all evidence and facts. WTH is wrong with you chumps. see sig

The more socialist this country becomes, millions more people suffer the living hell that is socialism...

Bernie is trying to sell socialism based upon countries like Denmark.

Well Denmark is smaller than some US states, neither of which has to maintain a standing army to be the world's policeman for which US states and Denmark depend. In addition, the size of the economies of the US and these smaller European countries are not even close. Simply put, the more money and power the more corruption there is. The US has driven up the highest debt in human history, and they want them to take on more? The US is now forced to grow it's economy to pay for the massive debt it has created, not embrace socialism which will shrink the economy.

The Amish are a good example of how well socialism works. They may as well compare the Amish to the US federal government.

Population has nothing to do with it, actually, but what about Japan, Germany, or France or UK? Spurious argument.

The population dictates how much the pot of money they collect is for socialism. The larger the pot of money, the more corrupt the system potentially is.

Also, the larger the population the less control voters have over those who are running things. If you were voting, would your vote count more if there were 100 people in the country or 1 million? Also, representative in far away Washington DC are not as good of a representative as those in your state. Those who live where you do are more accessible and are more apt to fulfill your needs. And lastly, who can attend to individual needs of all 50 states better than the representatives of those given states? Face it, population size matters when it comes to representation. The more local your representatives are the more of a voice you have. So socialism within a given community or state is more preferable to the massive federal model Bernie wishes to impose on us all.

If you had not noticed, the country is divided. Is it preferable to force half the country your direction or is self determination with the power of the vote better? Do you or do you not advocate democracy?

Duh. And everyone in the world beside Pub dupes know that socialism is ALWAYS DEMOCRATIC, AND NOT COMMUNISM.

 

[francoHFW]

These same folks often quote Krugman as well. That' all you need to know.

Krugman is a dolt...

Krugman keeps a keen eye on excessive off-shoring of White Collar careers and Business Visas.

...and he's clueless

In terms of Marx's theory you're clueless.
He was not a fan of any particular phase.

Marx's theory whatever phase has proven to be an failure...
Lol

^^Brainwashed functional moron^^. Socialism is ALWAYS democratic, communism NEVER, and basically DEAD.

 

[francoHFW]

Socialism reduces the gap between rich and poor. Conservatives would prefer a system that allows the rich and powerful to make that gap as wide as they wish.

Yea, under Stalin the Soviets had a much reduced gap between rich and poor.

Thanks for that.

BS. And that's totalitarian COMMUNISM.

 

[francoHFW]

'Why socialism fails'

They run out of other people's money....
There is also no incentive to work hard, to do your best, and to 'succeed'.

That's communism, brainwashed functional MORON.

 

[francoHFW]

Socialism reduces the gap between rich and poor. Conservatives would prefer a system that allows the rich and powerful to make that gap as wide as they wish.

Really, REALLY! So tell all of us nice people on here NYcarebear, how close in wealth is the regular Russian to Putin? How close is the regular Russian in wealth to those in the Politburo? They have almost total control, so how is that working out for the plebes?

Anyone that thinks there is a difference between socialism and communism, is delusional.
Socialism brings out the worst in human nature, there are all kinds of dictatorships to prove this to be true.

That's what Hitler said.

So there's no difference between North Korea and socialist Europe?

Are you sure about that? lol

Europe is living on borrowed time and money, just like us.
Sooner or later they will run out of band aids...
North Korea is a more evolved form of socialism, Europe will eventually get there...
Lol

Idiot. But thanks for the corrupt world depression, dupe of greedy idiot lying billionaires...

 

[peach174]

and you think is communism...against all evidence and facts. WTH is wrong with you chumps. see sig

The more socialist this country becomes, millions more people suffer the living hell that is socialism...

Bernie is trying to sell socialism based upon countries like Denmark.

Well Denmark is smaller than some US states, neither of which has to maintain a standing army to be the world's policeman for which US states and Denmark depend. In addition, the size of the economies of the US and these smaller European countries are not even close. Simply put, the more money and power the more corruption there is. The US has driven up the highest debt in human history, and they want them to take on more? The US is now forced to grow it's economy to pay for the massive debt it has created, not embrace socialism which will shrink the economy.

The Amish are a good example of how well socialism works. They may as well compare the Amish to the US federal government.

Population has nothing to do with it, actually, but what about Japan, Germany, or France or UK? Spurious argument.

The population dictates how much the pot of money they collect is for socialism. The larger the pot of money, the more corrupt the system potentially is.

Also, the larger the population the less control voters have over those who are running things. If you were voting, would your vote count more if there were 100 people in the country or 1 million? Also, representative in far away Washington DC are not as good of a representative as those in your state. Those who live where you do are more accessible and are more apt to fulfill your needs. And lastly, who can attend to individual needs of all 50 states better than the representatives of those given states? Face it, population size matters when it comes to representation. The more local your representatives are the more of a voice you have. So socialism within a given community or state is more preferable to the massive federal model Bernie wishes to impose on us all.

If you had not noticed, the country is divided. Is it preferable to force half the country your direction or is self determination with the power of the vote better? Do you or do you not advocate democracy?

Duh. And everyone in the world beside Pub dupes know that socialism is ALWAYS DEMOCRATIC, AND NOT COMMUNISM.

Really?
Cuba became a one-party republic and the Communist party became the official political party.

 

[ClosedCaption]

It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies.

 

[francoHFW]

"We're all socialists now!"- Finland PM when ACA passed.

NOT COMMUNISM, ya gd functional MORONS. Ay caramba.

Socialism is the step to Communism. Quote from Karl Marx.

And Communism is the step to Capitalism.
Quote from Karl Marx.

The only step to communism so far is corrupt capitalist fascism and violent revolution, dingbat. Marx didn't see unions and the embourgeoisement of the lower classes. Now being dismantled by the idiot New BS GOP. Marx was a twerp. Communism is dead, socialism is the final and best form of gov't. ALWAYS democratic and fair capitalism, dupe.

 

[francoHFW]

The more socialist this country becomes, millions more people suffer the living hell that is socialism...

Bernie is trying to sell socialism based upon countries like Denmark.

Well Denmark is smaller than some US states, neither of which has to maintain a standing army to be the world's policeman for which US states and Denmark depend. In addition, the size of the economies of the US and these smaller European countries are not even close. Simply put, the more money and power the more corruption there is. The US has driven up the highest debt in human history, and they want them to take on more? The US is now forced to grow it's economy to pay for the massive debt it has created, not embrace socialism which will shrink the economy.

The Amish are a good example of how well socialism works. They may as well compare the Amish to the US federal government.

Population has nothing to do with it, actually, but what about Japan, Germany, or France or UK? Spurious argument.

The population dictates how much the pot of money they collect is for socialism. The larger the pot of money, the more corrupt the system potentially is.

Also, the larger the population the less control voters have over those who are running things. If you were voting, would your vote count more if there were 100 people in the country or 1 million? Also, representative in far away Washington DC are not as good of a representative as those in your state. Those who live where you do are more accessible and are more apt to fulfill your needs. And lastly, who can attend to individual needs of all 50 states better than the representatives of those given states? Face it, population size matters when it comes to representation. The more local your representatives are the more of a voice you have. So socialism within a given community or state is more preferable to the massive federal model Bernie wishes to impose on us all.

If you had not noticed, the country is divided. Is it preferable to force half the country your direction or is self determination with the power of the vote better? Do you or do you not advocate democracy?

Duh. And everyone in the world beside Pub dupes know that socialism is ALWAYS DEMOCRATIC, AND NOT COMMUNISM.

Really?
Cuba became a one-party republic and the Communist party became the official political party.

Before Castro, it was a totally corrupt and fascist. Perfect place for violent communist revolution, dupe. Even then, RW GOP forced them into the arms of the USSR. RW morons as always ...

 

[the_human_being]

 

[peach174]

'Why socialism fails'

They run out of other people's money....
There is also no incentive to work hard, to do your best, and to 'succeed'.

That's communism, brainwashed functional MORON.

Both systems run out of other people's money.
The primary difference between the two is that communism is both an economic and political system, while socialism is only an economic system, and as such can exist within a number of political systems or even within parts of a larger economic system, such as capitalism.

As an economic system, socialism seeks to manage the economy through deliberate and collective social control. Communism, however, seeks to manage both the economy and the society by ensuring that property is owned collectively and that control over the distribution of resources is centralized to achieve both classlessness and statelessness. Under communism, As an economic system, socialism seeks to manage the economy through deliberate and collective social control. Communism, however, seeks to manage both the economy and the society by ensuring that property is owned collectively and that control over the distribution of resources is centralized to achieve both classlessness and statelessness. Under communism, all people are considered equal and are provided for equally, regardless of their contributions to the economy or to society.

Listen to Bernie Sanders this is what he is for.

 

[francoHFW]

'Why socialism fails'

They run out of other people's money....
There is also no incentive to work hard, to do your best, and to 'succeed'.

That's communism, brainwashed functional MORON.

Both systems run out of other people's money.
The primary difference between the two is that communism is both an economic and political system, while socialism is only an economic system, and as such can exist within a number of political systems or even within parts of a larger economic system, such as capitalism.

As an economic system, socialism seeks to manage the economy through deliberate and collective social control. Communism, however, seeks to manage both the economy and the society by ensuring that property is owned collectively and that control over the distribution of resources is centralized to achieve both classlessness and statelessness. Under communism, As an economic system, socialism seeks to manage the economy through deliberate and collective social control. Communism, however, seeks to manage both the economy and the society by ensuring that property is owned collectively and that control over the distribution of resources is centralized to achieve both classlessness and statelessness. Under communism, all people are considered equal and are provided for equally, regardless of their contributions to the economy or to society.

Listen to Bernie Sanders this is what he is for.

Jeebus what a brainwashed functional moron. Socialism is fair capitalism. Communism is a failed totalitarian system that only exists, to a point, in Cuba, China, and Vietnam, and dying if not dead. N. Korea is the only true communist country left, poor things.

 

[boedicca]

lol, another dumb post.

So you don't like being taxed for the road you drive on?
You don't like regulations that keep our air, water and food clean, fresh and disease free?
You think we shouldn't ever invest into the betterment of our nation???

Of course, if we spend all the money or tax the producer too much what you say may come to pass,,,but goddamn lets be real.

Oh Noeeessss!!111!!!!!! Burning Strawman Alert!!!!!!!!

 

[peach174]

'Why socialism fails'

They run out of other people's money....
There is also no incentive to work hard, to do your best, and to 'succeed'.

That's communism, brainwashed functional MORON.

Both systems run out of other people's money.
The primary difference between the two is that communism is both an economic and political system, while socialism is only an economic system, and as such can exist within a number of political systems or even within parts of a larger economic system, such as capitalism.

As an economic system, socialism seeks to manage the economy through deliberate and collective social control. Communism, however, seeks to manage both the economy and the society by ensuring that property is owned collectively and that control over the distribution of resources is centralized to achieve both classlessness and statelessness. Under communism, As an economic system, socialism seeks to manage the economy through deliberate and collective social control. Communism, however, seeks to manage both the economy and the society by ensuring that property is owned collectively and that control over the distribution of resources is centralized to achieve both classlessness and statelessness. Under communism, all people are considered equal and are provided for equally, regardless of their contributions to the economy or to society.

Listen to Bernie Sanders this is what he is for.

Jeebus what a brainwashed functional moron. Socialism is fair capitalism. Communism is a failed totalitarian system that only exists, to a point, in Cuba, China, and Vietnam, and dying if not dead. N. Korea is the only true communist country left, poor things.

Seems you are the brainwashed one.