Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I went to church this morningActually, they do. Try exercising them without the permission of the state and see where that gets you.
OMFG.So what was the purpose of the Constitution?
YOU said NO right is absolute.Wrong.
I'm sorry you don't like the fact you are wrong - but you are.So if me and a million of my closest friends want to march in Washington I don't need to get permission?
There's nothing ironic about this at all.Ironic you quoted this case: United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876),
Appeals court. Big whoop.United States v. Nelsen, 859 F.2d 1318 (1988)
Oct. 20, 1988 · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · No. 88-5169
A more irrelevant fact is hard to find.Four of the nine SCOTUS justices disagreed with the decision.
You ignored my other questions. Why?OMFG.
To create the federal government.
You mean to ask "what is the purpose of the bill of rights?
To prevent the state from interfering with our rights.
So everyone has the absolute right to vote. Is that what you're saying? Do ex-cons and children have that right? What about immigrants residing here legally or illegally?YOU said NO right is absolute.
This includes the right to vote under the 15th and 19th Amendments, and the freedom from slavery under the 13th.
Of course that didn't happen until 2008. Before that it held a different opinion.Appeals court. Big whoop.
The USSC has only ever held the right to keep and bear arms as protected by the 2nd is an individual right uncpnnected to the militia.
Not one has it ruled to the contrary.
Numbers change and pendulums swing.A more irrelevant fact is hard to find.
Their irrelevancy.You ignored my other questions. Why?
You said no right is absolute.So everyone has the absolute right to vote. Is that what you're saying
You statement is a lie.Of course that didn't happen until 2008. Before that it held a different opinion.
When that happens, let us know.Numbers change and pendulums swing.
No, the 2nd only protected individuals from the FEDERAL government, state restrictions were never prohibited until recently.You statement is a lie.
The USSC has only ever held the right to keep and bear arms as protected by the 2nd is an individual right unconnected to the militia.
If you don't have an answer that supports your ideology just admit it. Are rights universal or not?Their irrelevancy.
You need to work on your strawmen.You said no right is absolute.
Thus, you believe blacks and women can be denied the right to vote because they are blacks and women.
except like the fact you retards all claimed the right of the people didnt mean individuals in just the 2nd but did in all the rest of the amendments the states have been restricted on the other amendments since the 13 14 and 15 amendments were passed. If you didnt have hypocrisy and double standards to fall back on what ever would you do?No, the 2nd only protected individuals from the FEDERAL government, state restrictions were never prohibited until recently.
Aside from the right to assemble, which of the amendments mentioned membership in a group such as a militia?except like the fact you retards all claimed the right of the people didnt mean individuals in just the 2nd but did in all the rest of the amendments the states have been restricted on the other amendments since the 13 14 and 15 amendments were passed. If you didnt have hypocrisy and double standards to fall back on what ever would you do?
the part about the militia is not a controlling clause you retard several prominent English professors in the past have stated so and basic English skills prove it, it is simply one of any number of things that could be used to justify the right.Aside from the right to assemble, which of the amendments mentioned membership in a group such as a militia?
