Why Liberals Want To Ban The AR-15

[sparky]

don't need an excuse or a reason

that's because neither exists

~S~

There’s nothing more idiotic than attempting to ‘justify’ owning an AR where no such ‘justification’ exists.

Seeking to ‘ban’ AR 15s and rifles/carbines designated as ‘assault weapons’ is simply bad law – such measures are utterly ineffective, they’re an example of government excess and overreach, and such ‘bans’ are likely un-Constitutional.

But idiots continue to focus solely on ‘justifying’ owning an AR 15.

I'm basically a farmboy Clay

I have an arsenal, i hunt, i shoot, etc

I'm not attempting to justify the 2nd here , not trying for any constitutional showdown

A gun is a no more/less than a tool to me

~S~

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

don't need an excuse or a reason

that's because neither exists

~S~

There’s nothing more idiotic than attempting to ‘justify’ owning an AR where no such ‘justification’ exists.

Seeking to ‘ban’ AR 15s and rifles/carbines designated as ‘assault weapons’ is simply bad law – such measures are utterly ineffective, they’re an example of government excess and overreach, and such ‘bans’ are likely un-Constitutional.

But idiots continue to focus solely on ‘justifying’ owning an AR 15.

I'm basically a farmboy Clay

I have an arsenal, i hunt, i shoot, etc

I'm not attempting to justify the 2nd here , not trying for any constitutional showdown

A gun is a no more/less than a tool to me

~S~

It can be a tool, an avocation, or a ‘modern sporting rifle’ – people own AR 15s for all manner of personal, subjective reasons, none of which must be ‘justified.’

My passion is target shooting; I have a scoped AR whose sole purpose is to make nice tight five-shot groups at the range.

 

[pismoe]

and the AK and AR are simply efficient and Effective tools that can be used for any number of purposes Sparky .

 

[Flash]

If you don't want one then fine. However, shut the fuck up about me owning them.

Someone told him ARs are bad - and that's all he knows about them.

Liberal economic and social polices are bad, not AR-15s.

Liberal economic and social policies are a million times more destructive than all the assault weapons in the world.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

don't need an excuse or a reason

that's because neither exists

~S~

There’s nothing more idiotic than attempting to ‘justify’ owning an AR where no such ‘justification’ exists.

Seeking to ‘ban’ AR 15s and rifles/carbines designated as ‘assault weapons’ is simply bad law – such measures are utterly ineffective, they’re an example of government excess and overreach, and such ‘bans’ are likely un-Constitutional.

But idiots continue to focus solely on ‘justifying’ owning an AR 15.

Classification of "Assault Rifle" has already been ruled as "Unconstitutional". Actually, more ridiculous than anything else. An AR is really classed as a combat rifle. Hence the ruling that as long as the legislatures specifically call for an "AR-15/AK-47 and their various clones" they are free to do just about any ruling they wish. All arguments end there.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

***\\\This Is My Opinion///***

I believe Liberals want to ban the AR-15 for two reasons...

1. The AR-15 is scary looking, it's that simple. The AR-15 is scary looking and it's easy to get people to think the AR-15 is bad because of the way it looks.

2. Here's the main reason why Liberals want to ban the AR-15. If Liberals are successful, they can then point to other guns as more powerful and say "We banned the AR-15 so we should ban all of these other weapons because they are more powerful and accurate."

That's why the big push to ban the AR-15.

Well....every gun they use in movies is an AR-15. So....yeah.....they're scary.

Course those of us who have been in a fire-fight know we'd rather have an AK-47 than an AR-15.

The problem between the two is, the AK is the best for short range (under 100 yds) and the AR is best at over 100 yds. But in a combat situation, both do the job because that is exactly what they are designed to function to do from the ground up. But in a hunting/target/defense there are just so many far superior guns out there and most of them cost less and will give many more years of service. Case in point. If I am on a job and need to hammer a cotter pin in and all I have is a crescent wrench, do I take the time to go back to the shop and get a hammer or do I just tap it in with the crescent wrench? I tap it in with the crescent wrench if that is all I have. Does that make my wrench an Assault Wrench? Do I run around preaching and bullying that everyone should own that one brand of Crescent Wrench because it's a superior hammer?

 

[Daryl Hunt]

don't need an excuse or a reason

that's because neither exists

~S~

There’s nothing more idiotic than attempting to ‘justify’ owning an AR where no such ‘justification’ exists.

Seeking to ‘ban’ AR 15s and rifles/carbines designated as ‘assault weapons’ is simply bad law – such measures are utterly ineffective, they’re an example of government excess and overreach, and such ‘bans’ are likely un-Constitutional.

But idiots continue to focus solely on ‘justifying’ owning an AR 15.

I'm basically a farmboy Clay

I have an arsenal, i hunt, i shoot, etc

I'm not attempting to justify the 2nd here , not trying for any constitutional showdown

A gun is a no more/less than a tool to me

~S~

It can be a tool, an avocation, or a ‘modern sporting rifle’ – people own AR 15s for all manner of personal, subjective reasons, none of which must be ‘justified.’

My passion is target shooting; I have a scoped AR whose sole purpose is to make nice tight five-shot groups at the range.

And if you didn't have your AR would you just give up target shooting or would you have another rifle instead? Is it the AR that brings the joy of shooting or is it the joy of shooting? I prefer target shooting with the 1911A1 over the SWModel 27 because it takes more skill with the 1911 at a longer range. I realize the 357 out of the 7 inch barrel is probably superior to the 45 out of a 5 in barrel but I get a bigger kick out of doing the same job with the 45. It's the joy of shooting. Again, is the AR that brings the joy of shooting or is the joy of shooting that brings the joy of shooting?

 

[Bleipriester]

Yes, back then, there were tough Germans and they didn´t fight each other but stood together and rebuilt their country. Today, we have a degenerated national awareness as a result of the disgusting movements of exactly that time. You are another. Nazis everywhere, you throw yourself into their bullets, how generous, for as I have smoked too much weed. The cost of a bullet is but a few cent.
While you hate Nazis (or whom you deem one), the backwards population you welcome is even worse in your own terms. You again show us your hypocrisy as nationalism or religious extremism seems not to be a problem for you as long they spring from foreigners.
You see, we have social measures and everybody can get a flat regardless of the local rent index.
The problem is not only profiteering as it is covered by the welfare payments. The problem is the "demographic policy", that is led by extremism and not in accordance with the realities. The flats are not too expensive, they are missing. And that despite the emptiness of Germans houses few years ago. You filled them with criminals, islamists and Erdogan nationalists, now you blame the renters.

Germany: Refugees love President Assad

First let me say I hate it very much to speak with you. I hate criminals. I hate Nazis. You are both. I speak with you only on reasons, which you never will be able to understand.

Independent from this: The text which you wrote here is an unbelievable stupid nonsense and shows to me only a very confused mind. Stop it to use alcohol and/or drugs.

Sorry to hear that. For me it is great fun, or at least not the most boring thing to do. I don´t hate you. And you should calm down. Throw your hatred away. It´s a burden on your soul. You are mad, obsessed with something I don´t know and can´t understand.

Summary: You said "I am an idiot, who tries to think everyone else is an idiot too".

You are avoiding replying to my points.

It's totally idiotic what you say and you know this.

That has always been the case, you resort to personal attacks. The Nazis have imposed their racial correctness ("white is nazi") on the people.

To murder in Germany all politicians, all refugees and everyone from NGOs, who helps refugees, was one of your "problem solutions" for your problems, which don't exist in reality in your perverted view to the world. And whatever people try to speak about - you will bring it to the theme "migrants are the problem and the solution are weapons and wars."

Your shits did it again, I wonder how large the dark figure is. When will they start to protect the population from that scum they have imported?

: 14-jährige in Ulm von fünf Asylbewerbern vergewaltigt

If it wasn´t for the victims of your disgusting "Germany", I would not even post something. Now, the "Nazi-Revolution" becomes more and more inevitable to reclaim our rights.

 

[zaangalewa]

***\\\This Is My Opinion///***

I believe Liberals want to ban the AR-15 for two reasons...

1. The AR-15 is scary looking, it's that simple. The AR-15 is scary looking and it's easy to get people to think the AR-15 is bad because of the way it looks.

2. Here's the main reason why Liberals want to ban the AR-15. If Liberals are successful, they can then point to other guns as more powerful and say "We banned the AR-15 so we should ban all of these other weapons because they are more powerful and accurate."

That's why the big push to ban the AR-15.

And you are wrong. No other gun, freely available to civilians, is designed for or capable of killing as many people as possible in as short a time as possible as the AR-15.

Many liberals are just afraid of guns period. They come from a place of ignorance and project on everyone else.
There are more than 5 million of them in criculation and most of these people are being responsible. It makes no sense to take away these weapons from the vast majority because of a few nuts. Take those away and the nuts will grab a different weapon of choice.. then those will need to be banned as well, and so on and so on.

I do't know anybody who is afraid of guns.

Guns are always a risk. One of my brothers lost an eye because of an accident by a "harmless" air gun with very low power.

know lots that are afraid of gun nuts with guns.

Most people in the world think all US-Americans are mad. Reason: Glorification of violence. A gun is practised violence of weak people. If Mr. Sigmund Freud still would live, he had a lot to do.

Says a guy from a country that murdered 12 million innocent men, women and children....on top of all the war dead caused by their aggression creating World War 2.

When the USA will [¿continue to?] follow the way of Hitler, then everyone in the world will get much bigger problems than only Hitler and his gang.

 

[zaangalewa]

... Now, the "Nazi-Revolution" becomes more and more inevitable to reclaim our rights.

Okay - you decided with this words to be a terrorist in the footstep of the Nazis. Don't forget to install a cyanide capsule in one of your teeth.

 

[NoVote]

And you are wrong. No other gun, freely available to civilians, is designed for or capable of killing as many people as possible in as short a time as possible as the AR-15.

And you are a dumbass of the first water with zero life [or death] experience. The good old M-14 will kill more, has killed more, than the AR-15, The Thompson .45 "tommy gun" is a whackadoo of epic proportions, and those are just AMERICAN guns. Probably the most prolific death dealer of all times though, was the German MP 40 (Maschinenpistole 40), It killed millions not so long ago. I could, but won't, [cause your just not worth the bother] go into what the Asians or Russians did less than a century ago. None of those are 'freely available' to civilians 'ANY MORE' but they were, and in case you tard have [and obviously you have] forgotten, they can easily come back. Which, if you had an IQ of more than 9, would make you too smart to be a tard anyway.

 

[Bleipriester]

... Now, the "Nazi-Revolution" becomes more and more inevitable to reclaim our rights.

Okay - you decided with this words to be a terrorist in the footstep of the Nazis. Don't forget to install a cyanide capsule in one of your teeth.

Maybe, when your children get gang raped, your opinion will change.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

And you are wrong. No other gun, freely available to civilians, is designed for or capable of killing as many people as possible in as short a time as possible as the AR-15.

And you are a dumbass of the first water with zero life [or death] experience. The good old M-14 will kill more, has killed more, than the AR-15, The Thompson .45 "tommy gun" is a whackadoo of epic proportions, and those are just AMERICAN guns. Probably the most prolific death dealer of all times though, was the German MP 40 (Maschinenpistole 40), It killed millions not so long ago. I could, but won't, [cause your just not worth the bother] go into what the Asians or Russians did less than a century ago. None of those are 'freely available' to civilians 'ANY MORE' but they were, and in case you tard have [and obviously you have] forgotten, they can easily come back. Which, if you had an IQ of more than 9, would make you too smart to be a tard anyway.

Yah, right after you repeal a bunch of laws. And how's that working out for you again?

 

[Rustic]

***\\\This Is My Opinion///***

I believe Liberals want to ban the AR-15 for two reasons...

1. The AR-15 is scary looking, it's that simple. The AR-15 is scary looking and it's easy to get people to think the AR-15 is bad because of the way it looks.

2. Here's the main reason why Liberals want to ban the AR-15. If Liberals are successful, they can then point to other guns as more powerful and say "We banned the AR-15 so we should ban all of these other weapons because they are more powerful and accurate."

That's why the big push to ban the AR-15.

The left wants to ban not only AR-15's, AK-47's and similar types, not because they look scary, the left looks at countries which banned firearms for the public in general (Soviet Union, Vietnam, Cuba, Venezuela, China, et cetera) and sees that once the public is disarmed, they are no longer a threat to the government, once the oppressive laws are implemented. What we are seeing is the rise of a potential oppressive/tyrannical government and the only solution may be civil war.

What WE are seeing is the gunnutters are still trying to play the old Fear Game. Hate to break it to you but people are more afraid of losing their children to nutcases with "Legal" ARs than they are about whether you can have all the dangerous toys you want to play with.

Your whole thing is nothing but a Circus Act with a dog and pony. Get new materiel.

Your children have a better chance of being eaten by a bear in the middle of the city than being gunned down in a school by a mentally-ill person or terrorist (which you want to come in unvetted by the government, through open borders).
Apparently, you seem not to grasp that there are close to a HUNDRED MILLION private citizens who legally purchased lawful firearms in the USA and its territories...AND...aren't committing crime one with them, nor are any likely to. We are no threat to you, your family or, your friends.
People who own firearms are almost to a person, not a "nutter," as you seem to like to describe us. We own them, enjoy them on the range, or, also in my case, have a concealed carry permit and mind our own business.
You on the other hand, are the Socialist/Communist left that wants to disarm the very people who our founding fathers wanted to ensure were armed, should the domestic government ever become tyrannical, of which your government will likely become, as all strict Socialist/Communist countries do become.

You can live without an AR or an AK easy enough. Or you can live with having to have a special license to own one that isn't too hard to get similar to the difficulty of getting a CCW. For licensed CCW, there has been only one recorded murder in the history of the CCW. That means, one out of 3 million plus for at least 30 years. I don't propose we take your AR or your AK but we put them under a special licensing just like most CCW. If I want a CCW (I may have one or not, I ain't sayin' ) I just have to file with the Sheriffs department and walk out with the license. Takes about 15 minutes. My background doesn't require me to attend the classes. But even if it did, so what. A little training ain't such a bad thing. And an afternoon at the range would be part of it and would be a gas. Another reason to fire the gun. The other option would be to ban the AR and AK. You can work with me on the special license or lose your precious AR sooner or later.

If that special licensing were to be required, the fruitcakes would not be able to walk in, purchase either the AR or the AK and walk out with them ready to shoot up a Church, School, Retail Store of any other public Gathering so easily. Yes, they could still get a handgun but there is no way in hell that a handgun can do the damage as quickly as an AR or an AK nor matter what you Rexall Rangers believe.

Lol
Drama queen

 

[Rustic]

***\\\This Is My Opinion///***

I believe Liberals want to ban the AR-15 for two reasons...

1. The AR-15 is scary looking, it's that simple. The AR-15 is scary looking and it's easy to get people to think the AR-15 is bad because of the way it looks.

2. Here's the main reason why Liberals want to ban the AR-15. If Liberals are successful, they can then point to other guns as more powerful and say "We banned the AR-15 so we should ban all of these other weapons because they are more powerful and accurate."

That's why the big push to ban the AR-15.

Actually, there is a long list of "assault weapons" the left wants to ban, the AR-15 being only one of them on that long list.

Lol
Pussies

 

[Rustic]

don't need an excuse or a reason

that's because neither exists

~S~

There’s nothing more idiotic than attempting to ‘justify’ owning an AR where no such ‘justification’ exists.

Seeking to ‘ban’ AR 15s and rifles/carbines designated as ‘assault weapons’ is simply bad law – such measures are utterly ineffective, they’re an example of government excess and overreach, and such ‘bans’ are likely un-Constitutional.

But idiots continue to focus solely on ‘justifying’ owning an AR 15.

Lol
Firearm ownership is personal, People need to stay out of other peoples private affairs.

 

[Rustic]

don't need an excuse or a reason

that's because neither exists

~S~

There’s nothing more idiotic than attempting to ‘justify’ owning an AR where no such ‘justification’ exists.

Seeking to ‘ban’ AR 15s and rifles/carbines designated as ‘assault weapons’ is simply bad law – such measures are utterly ineffective, they’re an example of government excess and overreach, and such ‘bans’ are likely un-Constitutional.

But idiots continue to focus solely on ‘justifying’ owning an AR 15.

I'm basically a farmboy Clay

I have an arsenal, i hunt, i shoot, etc

I'm not attempting to justify the 2nd here , not trying for any constitutional showdown

A gun is a no more/less than a tool to me

~S~

It can be a tool, an avocation, or a ‘modern sporting rifle’ – people own AR 15s for all manner of personal, subjective reasons, none of which must be ‘justified.’

My passion is target shooting; I have a scoped AR whose sole purpose is to make nice tight five-shot groups at the range.

And if you didn't have your AR would you just give up target shooting or would you have another rifle instead? Is it the AR that brings the joy of shooting or is it the joy of shooting? I prefer target shooting with the 1911A1 over the SWModel 27 because it takes more skill with the 1911 at a longer range. I realize the 357 out of the 7 inch barrel is probably superior to the 45 out of a 5 in barrel but I get a bigger kick out of doing the same job with the 45. It's the joy of shooting. Again, is the AR that brings the joy of shooting or is the joy of shooting that brings the joy of shooting?

Whatever anyone chooses is best for them, no one else’s business... certainly none of the federal governments business

 

[zaangalewa]

... Now, the "Nazi-Revolution" becomes more and more inevitable to reclaim our rights.

Okay - you decided with this words to be a terrorist in the footstep of the Nazis. Don't forget to install a cyanide capsule in one of your teeth.

Maybe, when your children get gang raped, your opinion will change.

Nazis made in general much more worse things - not only with members of my own family. I know very well how dangerous you are. And meanwhile you convinced me you are lost - and everyone, who believes in your delusions, is lost too. Nazis destroy humanity, win death and destructions and create a neverending hell during their whole life. I don't know what you get for. But I am sure it is not worth the price. No one is able to win anything in the end, who fights against god.

 

[zaangalewa]

pismoe

What means your "funny"?

 

[pismoe]

pismoe

What means your "funny"?

------------------------------------ mostly disgust , disapproval and just an easy insult Zang .