Why isn't congress pushing impeachment proceedings now?

[Too Tall]

you are a fucking idiot. He quoted actual court cases and you go as if they dont exist, because you wont change your mind, and then you ask him a question in number 3 that he already answered.
You are one of the stupidest people on the internet. Good job moron.

I don't give a god damn what liberal court he used as reference.
Fuck wit a liberal court can get over tuirned. Fuckwit
1. The president cannot use the military without congressional approval
2. The dream act was not passed obama just went past congress.
So eat my mother fucking shit balls stupid fuck. All I said is Constitutional. Fuck you and your go\d damn liberal fucking vioews SOB.

In Dellums v. Bush, 752 F. Supp. 1141 (1990), D.C. Federal District Court Judge Harold H. Greene denied to grant an injunction against GHWB’s military build up in the Persian Gulf. The ruling established the doctrine that the courts will not get involved in disputes between the Congress and Executive. And it was Congress that foolishly gave away its sole authority to the Executive to declare war. WH legal staff have argued that because there are no ground troops involved, the WPA does not apply. Congress has no standing to sue over the issue and since there is no violation of the Constitution and the law, there are no grounds to impe

Note the underlined part you fucking moron. Your wrong, you are always wrong, and this will it ever be that you are a waste of air.
The president Can and has used Military force without congress since the war powers act. You have no argument, you have no facts on your side. You have your stupid ignorant opinion and that just doesnt cut it.

Oh btw dipshit, Simply stating that you are wrong and that the President can in fact use the military without approval doesnt make me a liberal. Then again a moron like you wouldnt understand these simple things.

why dont you go into your living room, drool, and jerk off to Beck feeding you your daily porn.

Fuck i take shits that have a higher brain wave level than you.

On January 12 1991 Congress granted GHW Bush the authority to wage war against Iraq. At 3 AM Baghdad time on January 17,1991, Operation Desert Storm began.

 

[Too Tall]

I don't give a god damn what liberal court he used as reference.
Fuck wit a liberal court can get over tuirned. Fuckwit
1. The president cannot use the military without congressional approval
2. The dream act was not passed obama just went past congress.
So eat my mother fucking shit balls stupid fuck. All I said is Constitutional. Fuck you and your go\d damn liberal fucking vioews SOB.

In Dellums v. Bush, 752 F. Supp. 1141 (1990), D.C. Federal District Court Judge Harold H. Greene denied to grant an injunction against GHWB’s military build up in the Persian Gulf. The ruling established the doctrine that the courts will not get involved in disputes between the Congress and Executive. And it was Congress that foolishly gave away its sole authority to the Executive to declare war. WH legal staff have argued that because there are no ground troops involved, the WPA does not apply. Congress has no standing to sue over the issue and since there is no violation of the Constitution and the law, there are no grounds to impe

Note the underlined part you fucking moron. Your wrong, you are always wrong, and this will it ever be that you are a waste of air.
The president Can and has used Military force without congress since the war powers act. You have no argument, you have no facts on your side. You have your stupid ignorant opinion and that just doesnt cut it.

Oh btw dipshit, Simply stating that you are wrong and that the President can in fact use the military without approval doesnt make me a liberal. Then again a moron like you wouldnt understand these simple things.

why dont you go into your living room, drool, and jerk off to Beck feeding you your daily porn.

Fuck i take shits that have a higher brain wave level than you.

little boy go plasy with your autobots.


Court case versus Constitutional law.
PURPOSE AND POLICY
SEC. 2. (a) It is the purpose of this joint resolution to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgement of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.

(b) Under article I, section 8, of the Constitution, it is specifically provided that the Congress shall have the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution, not only its own powers but also all other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

(c) The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.
Avalon Project - War Powers Resolution

I distinctly remember Libya attacking the United States. NOT!

 

[hellofromwarsaw]

American armed forces are NOT involved in hostilities in Libya, nor are they imminently in danger of same, so stfu. tyvm...the French are taking care of it...

 

[Too Tall]

American armed forces are NOT involved in hostilities in Libya, nor are they imminently in danger of same, so stfu. tyvm...the French are taking care of it...

An undisclosed number of CIA operatives are said to be in Libya to gather intelligence for airstrikes and make contacts with rebels.

20 Mach 2011 Nineteen U.S. planes conducted strike operations in Libya. The planes included Marine Corps AV-8B Harriers,US Navy EA-18G Growlers, which were diverted from operations over Iraq and jammed Libyan radar and communications, and Air Force F-15 and F-16 fighter jets.

22 March 2011: One USAF F-15E taking off from Aviano crashed in Bu Marim, northwest of Benghazi. Both airmen were recovered alive by Marines from the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit based on the USS Kearsarge. The aircraft reportedly crashed due to a mechanical failure. The rescue operation involved two Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey aircraft, two Sikorsky CH-53 Sea Stallion helicopters, and two McDonnell Douglas AV-8B Harrier II aircraft, all launched from the USS Kearsarge. The operation involved the Harriers' dropping 500-pound (227 kg) bombs and strafing the area around the crash site before an Osprey recovered at least one of the downed aircraft's crew injuring 6 local civilians in the process.

29 March 2011The US used AC-130 gunships and A-10 Thunderbolt tankbusters against Moamar Gaddafi's troops in Libya. U.S. aircraft fired on a Libyan coast guard vessel, forcing it to limp to shore, after it launched missiles at merchant ships in the port of Misrata, U.S military officials said Tuesday.

4 April 2011: A US Marine Corps AV-8B Harrier and a US Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II flew missions near Serta and Brega respectively. 4 April also marked the last day of US armed forces taking an active role in military action, as all American forces were placed in reserve that evening, to be used only if requested by NATO

2011 military intervention in Libya - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Are you sure NATO hasn't requested help? I'm not.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Since when is lying under oath and obstruction a partisan issue?

It’s not the alleged crimes per se but what the opposition elects to do about the alleged crimes.

For the record I believe the President’s actions un-Constitutional – I just can’t prove it as the courts refuse to get involved.

But Congress also acted un-Constitutionally when it passed the WPA; Congress does not have the authority to abdicate its Constitutionally mandated and sole authority to declare war and cede it to the Executive. This can only be accomplished via the amendment process.

If Congress were serious about correcting this wrong, it would repeal the WPA and enact legislation ‘taking back’ its sole authority to declare war. It would then withdraw funding for this or any other military operation deemed not in the Nation’s interest.

 

[hellofromwarsaw]

He got 60 days before having to consult congress....since then, France is doing the fighting...

 

[bigrebnc1775]

He got 60 days before having to consult congress....since then, France is doing the fighting...

60 days have long since passed.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

In Dellums v. Bush, 752 F. Supp. 1141 (1990), D.C. Federal District Court Judge Harold H. Greene denied to grant an injunction against GHWB’s military build up in the Persian Gulf. The ruling established the doctrine that the courts will not get involved in disputes between the Congress and Executive. And it was Congress that foolishly gave away its sole authority to the Executive to declare war. WH legal staff have argued that because there are no ground troops involved, the WPA does not apply. Congress has no standing to sue over the issue and since there is no violation of the Constitution and the law, there are no grounds to impe

Note the underlined part you fucking moron. Your wrong, you are always wrong, and this will it ever be that you are a waste of air.
The president Can and has used Military force without congress since the war powers act. You have no argument, you have no facts on your side. You have your stupid ignorant opinion and that just doesnt cut it.

Oh btw dipshit, Simply stating that you are wrong and that the President can in fact use the military without approval doesnt make me a liberal. Then again a moron like you wouldnt understand these simple things.

why dont you go into your living room, drool, and jerk off to Beck feeding you your daily porn.

Fuck i take shits that have a higher brain wave level than you.

little boy go plasy with your autobots.


Court case versus Constitutional law.
PURPOSE AND POLICY
SEC. 2. (a) It is the purpose of this joint resolution to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgement of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.

(b) Under article I, section 8, of the Constitution, it is specifically provided that the Congress shall have the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution, not only its own powers but also all other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

(c) The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.
Avalon Project - War Powers Resolution

jesus christ you are a dense motherfucker.

The War Powers act takes care of this, and we have a judgement that basically settles the matter of Congress sueing the President, setting precedent that it cant happen.

You can keep on quoting whatever section you like. Your opinion does not wash away 225 + of this nations history you ignorant fuck.

War Powers Resolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States Congress joint resolution; this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."

take the bold as evidence you fucking moron that it was passed in made into a LAW.A President can send troops in if the president so see's fit, and congress cant take him to court if no troops are on the ground etc.

We have the judges ruling that shows congress cant do shit in that regard, nor will a court rule on it.

So as of right now because of that Ruling with Bush SR. You have no argument. You cant remove Obama no matter how hard you attempt to you partisan hack.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order_(United_States)

U.S. Presidents have issued Executive Orders since 1789, usually to help officers and agencies of the Executive branch manage the operations within the Federal Government itself. Executive orders do have the full force of law since issuances are typically made in pursuance of certain Acts of Congress, some of which specifically delegate to the President some degree of discretionary power (delegated legislation), or are believed to have their authority for issuances based in a power inherently granted to the Executive by the Constitution. It is these cited or perceived justifications made by a President when authoring Executive Orders that have come under criticism for exceeding Executive authority and have been subject to legal proceedings even at various times throughout U.S. history concerning the legal validity or justification behind an order's issuance.

you are complaining about something that has been going on since the Founding ,and since the founders according to you stupid fucks that think they are perfect, Cant be wrong.

You are ignoring Facts presented to you in order to keep your little meme going about how much you hate the current President. Had this been a Republican/conservative/socialcon/neo-con/theo-con you wouldnt be saying jack fucking shit.

In fact you would be defending them that the partisan abortion you are.

this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces

Kid go play with your transformers. Congress did not authorize action in libya, and the time limit has run out. Libya was no threat and their was no emergency.
I love smacking you up side the head.

 

[Dot Com]

I don't give a god damn what liberal court he used as reference.
Fuck wit a liberal court can get over tuirned. Fuckwit
1. The president cannot use the military without congressional approval
2. The dream act was not passed obama just went past congress.
So eat my mother fucking shit balls stupid fuck. All I said is Constitutional. Fuck you and your go\d damn liberal fucking vioews SOB.

 

[EriktheRed]

When Congress didn't pass it and that is the will of the people.
obama is using the executive order as a dictator rubber stamp.

How about if a bill can't make through congress because of legislative shennigans, we put that bill up for a vote on a National level.

Majority wins.

How about no. How about we impeach the little dictator want to be?

No, stupid, how 'bout we don't, since all he's really guilty of is doing things wingnuts like you don't like.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I don't give a god damn what liberal court he used as reference.
Fuck wit a liberal court can get over tuirned. Fuckwit
1. The president cannot use the military without congressional approval
2. The dream act was not passed obama just went past congress.
So eat my mother fucking shit balls stupid fuck. All I said is Constitutional. Fuck you and your go\d damn liberal fucking vioews SOB.

Three stars. for your's

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How about if a bill can't make through congress because of legislative shennigans, we put that bill up for a vote on a National level.

Majority wins.

How about no. How about we impeach the little dictator want to be?

No, stupid, how 'bout we don't, since all he's really guilty of is doing things wingnuts like you don't like.

You have me confused with what you look at in the mirror. I do not support obama which makes me one billion times smarter than all obama supporters combined.

 

[Salt Jones]

Come on people why is congress sitting on their ass and dong nothing? obama tried to get cap and trade passed in 2009 that was a fail, so he get's his EPA thugs to create rules that will work as good as passing cap and trade.

Next he by-passes congress and uses the military in Libya with out congressional approval.

Next last year the dream act was not passed by congress but obama issues a presidential order by-passes congress again and passes the dream act.

Why is he being allowed to misuse the "presidential order"
Isn't this how dictators begin?

You are correct. Republicans in the House should vote to impeach President Obama, they should do it tonight.

 

[Dot Com]

This was a multi-national (read- "paid-for" by more than just the U.S.) peacekeeping operation rebel-dude. As opposed to unilateral wars of the previous Repub administration that were put on this great nation's credit card .

 

[Dot Com]

How about no. How about we impeach the little dictator want to be?

No, stupid, how 'bout we don't, since all he's really guilty of is doing things wingnuts like you don't like.

You have me confused with what you look at in the mirror. I do not support obama which makes me one billion times smarter than all obama supporters combined.

You're a legend in your own mind. Most righties are.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Come on people why is congress sitting on their ass and dong nothing? obama tried to get cap and trade passed in 2009 that was a fail, so he get's his EPA thugs to create rules that will work as good as passing cap and trade.

Next he by-passes congress and uses the military in Libya with out congressional approval.

Next last year the dream act was not passed by congress but obama issues a presidential order by-passes congress again and passes the dream act.

Why is he being allowed to misuse the "presidential order"
Isn't this how dictators begin?

You are correct. Republicans in the House should vote to impeach President Obama, they should do it tonight.

It would appear you have a problem with the constitutional process.

 

[EriktheRed]

How about no. How about we impeach the little dictator want to be?

No, stupid, how 'bout we don't, since all he's really guilty of is doing things wingnuts like you don't like.

You have me confused with what you look at in the mirror. I do not support obama which makes me one billion times smarter than all obama supporters combined.

Yeah, whatever you say, dipshit. BTW, you can thank your GOP friends back in the 90s for abusing the impeachment process. They might actually have a better shot at seeing this one taken out if they hadn't tried to take out Clinton like they did.

 

[Dot Com]

No, stupid, how 'bout we don't, since all he's really guilty of is doing things wingnuts like you don't like.

You have me confused with what you look at in the mirror. I do not support obama which makes me one billion times smarter than all obama supporters combined.

Yeah, whatever you say, dipshit. BTW, you can thank your GOP friends back in the 90s for abusing the impeachment process. They might actually have a better shot at seeing this one taken out if they hadn't tried to take out Clinton like they did.

Gingrich was cheating on his then wife while that was going on too

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No, stupid, how 'bout we don't, since all he's really guilty of is doing things wingnuts like you don't like.

You have me confused with what you look at in the mirror. I do not support obama which makes me one billion times smarter than all obama supporters combined.

You're a legend in your own mind. Most righties are.

With all the bullshit obama has done you still support him. Nothing you can say against can top your level of stupidity for supporting the bastard.

 

[Salt Jones]

Come on people why is congress sitting on their ass and dong nothing? obama tried to get cap and trade passed in 2009 that was a fail, so he get's his EPA thugs to create rules that will work as good as passing cap and trade.

Next he by-passes congress and uses the military in Libya with out congressional approval.

Next last year the dream act was not passed by congress but obama issues a presidential order by-passes congress again and passes the dream act.

Why is he being allowed to misuse the "presidential order"
Isn't this how dictators begin?

You are correct. Republicans in the House should vote to impeach President Obama, they should do it tonight.

It would appear you have a problem with the constitutional process.

No, I think they should impeach him and I'll sit back and watch him be reelected in a landslide.

P.S. The republicans would lose the House in 2012