The Mayorkas Impeachment Should Go To The Supreme Court Now!

[Blisterfinger]

''There is no evidence against Mayorkas, only lies of ReNaziKlans.''


There needs to be an age limit to keep the juvenile spammers off the board.

There needs to be an IQ limit to keep dumb shits like you off the board

 

[TNHarley]

So the super smart poster... starts a thread under "Congress" topic... about the Supreme Court... that doesnt decide an impeachment since that is the Senates job? Spectacular self own.

Senate doesnt decide on impeachment.
Nice self own

 

[Hollie]

There needs to be an IQ limit to keep dumb shits like you off the board

Just a gentle nudge is all it takes to send the juvenile name-callers into their saliva-slinging tirades.

 

[Arlette]

Biden's impeachment is still on the griddle. Biggest failure and corrupt president of all time.

Comer failed again. There will be no impeachment.

 

[rampart]

This is really alarming the impeachment of Alejandro Mayorkas, the Secretary of Homeland Security, it sets a dangerous precedent that Cabinet Secretaries can be impeached for violating the law as the majority Party of the House of Representatives. Practically it allows for impeachment of Secretaries of major government departments for policy differences with the majority Party in the House and since these Secretaries are carrying out the policies of the President this will weaken the power of the Presidency this is a bad development. The framework of our goverment is the Congress makes the laws and the President administers the laws Congress should not be permitted to obstruct the President in administering the laws as he or she sees fit. Congress always has a remedy to go to the third branch of government the Court system to enjoin the Executive Branch of government to follow the law. This impeachment move by the House against Secretary Mayorkas has a profound effect on our form of government it is a power grab by the House of Representatives if let stand it will cause repeated harm in America as future officials in future Presidential administrations are impeached for policy difference or unacceptable performance as determined by the House majority. The U.S. Constitution requires that crimes to have been committed for an impeachment to lie. If one reads the articles of impeachment against Mayorkas no fact patterns are alleged for crimes, for violations of law yes but that is policy differences.

This House impeachment of Secretary Mayorkas needs to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court so they can overturn it for violating the U.S. Constitution for impeaching someone where there is no crime committed, it is a policy difference or a performance difference. It is not okay or good that a plan be followed where the Senate gets rid of the impeachment because that won't void this impeachment precedent. I am not a constitutional lawyer but I think that any member of the House should have standing for such an appeal because allowing impeachment for policy differences affects the effectiveness of their chamber, it can allow for wasteful and illegal legislative action, Further, I think any member of the Senate should have standing to appeal this impeachment for essentially a similar reason that this illegal impeachment will waste Senate precious time holding a trial or other proceedings to resolve the impeachment matter!

supreme court? impeachments are political, held in the capital with chief hustice presiding. get an ammendment if you don't like it.

this impeachment should be on c span so that mayorksa can explain to the people something that comer and jordan do not seem to understand.



.