Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah I know, the warmers favorite line. Wash rinse repeat never changes. Everyday the same comment and everyday no evidence just the squawk line. Polly need a cracker?What evidence is that?
The evidence you ignore because you don't want it to be true.
It's nice the ice is gone don't ya think?There can be little doubt that the Earth is warming. I believe we have enough data and evidence to show it clearly.
I seriously doubt there is anything that can be done by it by humans however, no more than could all the ants in the world do anything about it either.
Poor stupid old woman....seems that the papers...all of them show concern over the cooling of the time...and as to the papers on particulates...science was grasping about looking for a reason for the cooling.....and perhaps a way to stop it... sorry this all so far over your head...but alas, the cooling scare was real...and hundreds of papers bear that out... no amount of your whining or lashing out will change it....
Yeah I know, the warmers favorite line. Wash rinse repeat never changes. Everyday the same comment and everyday no evidence just the squawk line. Polly need a cracker?
Blah, blah, blah, as I stated, there it is. Wash, rinse, repeatYeah I know, the warmers favorite line. Wash rinse repeat never changes. Everyday the same comment and everyday no evidence just the squawk line. Polly need a cracker?
Guy, the evidence is there, you're the one sticking your fingers in your ears and ignoring it.
Yeah I know, the warmers favorite line. Wash rinse repeat never changes. Everyday the same comment and everyday no evidence just the squawk line. Polly need a cracker?
Guy, the evidence is there, you're the one sticking your fingers in your ears and ignoring it.
I look at the evidence, and find the alarmists's case to be exaggerated. All their predictions for the near future have been walked back. Fundamental factors like climate sensitivity have continued to fall. Yet predictions for 2100 have only gotten more catastrophic.
YOU are the one who should be looking at the evidence more closely.
I look at the evidence, and find the alarmists's case to be exaggerated. All their predictions for the near future have been walked back. Fundamental factors like climate sensitivity have continued to fall. Yet predictions for 2100 have only gotten more catastrophic.
YOU are the one who should be looking at the evidence more closely.
Right...so all that melting glaciers and permafrost and flooding, no biggie, right?
I do agree, some of the alarmists have been over the top.
doesn't take away from the fact that the world is getting warming and it's having bad effects.
The glaciers started melting 150 years ago, and have mostly been melting ever since. Do you guys think the LIA was optimal?
What are these bad effects you talk about? The world is greener now than it has been since the Roman or Medieval Warm Periods.
The glaciers started melting 150 years ago, and have mostly been melting ever since. Do you guys think the LIA was optimal?
What are these bad effects you talk about? The world is greener now than it has been since the Roman or Medieval Warm Periods.
It's also a lot hotter... but never mind, you are evidence impervious, like most deniers.
Why is hotter bad?The glaciers started melting 150 years ago, and have mostly been melting ever since. Do you guys think the LIA was optimal?
What are these bad effects you talk about? The world is greener now than it has been since the Roman or Medieval Warm Periods.
It's also a lot hotter... but never mind, you are evidence impervious, like most deniers.
You know if you look at your graph a different way, it looks like we are going into a friggin ice age, and for a very long time.Ian,
I missed where he claimed the source of his (our) understanding of current temperatures was current proxy values. This seems to indicate a significant temperature increase.
Hey Joe, did you know when the Earth was first created that the Temperature at the surface was molten? But then over a long period of time, the planet started cooling?
That's the key thing. LONG PERIOD OF TIME.
The temperatures are going up so fast, the planet doesn't have time to adapt... that's the problem.
But you don't believe in that dun-der science, Cleetus. They don't talk about none of that stuff in the Bible.
Back in 1977, Time magazine was saying that with cooling a "New Ice Age" was happening.
In ONE ARTICLE.
Meanwhile, the scientific consensus, even back then, was that global warming was a real thing.
About That 1970s Global Cooling...
Allow me to summarize. It is true that all this news did appear in the popular mass media and TV shows like In Search Of, but believe it or not, the news media had the same proclivity then as they do now for reporting what's new and sensational. Climatologists had known for a long time about the greenhouse effect and the warming produced by carbon dioxide, but until the latter half of the 20th century, nobody had really been able to put together predictive models. Then in the late 1960s, the University of Washington published the cooling effects produced by sulfate aerosols in the atmosphere, which reflected solar radiation away from the Earth. This was a profound new twist, and suddenly everyone started testing for sulfate aerosols, an industrial pollutant which is also the cause of acid rain. You may remember that from the 1970s as well. Cooling effects were added onto climate models, and for a time, a number of climatologists weren't sure which effect was going to be the more significant. That was all it took to make a sensational headline, and the mass media ensured that we've have shocking fears to keep us alarmed throughout the decade. But beneath the surface, the response of mainstream climatologists was more measured.
The things he is showing you in those photos have NOT happened within human history and they have probably not happened at that rate for the last 65 million years.
Well they don't...but you warmer wackos keep claiming that they do...and if you could find any, you would like nothing more than to slap me down with some...
Guy, I'm not having a conversation with you about all the evidence you are willfully ignoring.
Um, yeah, but it took THOUSANDS of years for that to happen, not decades.
Such as that one glacier in the second picture vanished in less than 60 years. That's what you nutters don't get... this is happening a lot faster than the planet and life forms that don't live in climate controlled boxes can adapt to.
What evidence is that?
The evidence you ignore because you don't want it to be true.
University of East Anglia emails: the most contentious quotesWhat conclusions can be drawn here? That AR5, The Physical Science Basis, is nothing BUT a complilation of almost 2,000 pages of evidence supporting AGW is factually indisputable. That you continue to claim it does not indicates that you 1) Are exceptionally stupid or 2) Lie.
Funny how liberal compassion always brings out the best of a liberal when they get caught in a big fat Lie. Once again, libidiots, CLIMATE CHANGE has been happening since the beginning of time, man made is nothing but a scheme to take the tax payers money and make people like Al-Jazeera Gore very wealthy. And the libidiots let them get away with it.The IPCC is the UN body charged with monitoring climate change. The scientists did not want it to consider studies that challenge the view that global warming is genuine and man-made.
Climate change sceptics tried to use Freedom of Information laws to obtain raw climate data submitted to an IPCC report known as AR4. The scientists did not want their email exchanges about the data to be made public.
"Phil and I are likely to have to respond to more crap criticisms from the idiots in the near future."
The scientists make no attempt to hide their disdain for climate change sceptics who request more information about their work.
