Why is it so hard to understand that TAX cuts INCREASES tax revenues?

[AntonToo]

Government is notoriously mismanaged, wasteful and fraud-ridden.

Not really, and what the hell does that have to do with tax-cut effects on government revenues?

 

[Flash]

How dumb do you have to be to think that the stupid corrupt government is better at spending the money that you make rather than yourself?

I'm simply asking for a projected model of economic effects under the desired conditions that the OP is promoting. So far nobody can put down some real numbers for us to look at.

Real numbers:

The combined cost of Federal, State and Local government in this country is about 40% of GDP.

For most Americans working families the yearly direct and indict cost of government is the single largest household expense.

According to the CIA Factbook the cost of combined government in the US is greater than the GDP of all but two other countries on earth. If you include only the Federal government that only adds two more countries to the list and one of them just barely makes the cut.

Because of the horrendous cost of government this country has, for the last eight years, experienced increased poverty, decreased family income, increased income disparity, had dismal economic growth and accumulated $10 trillion additional debt on the Federal side and three trillion on the State and local side.

The cost of government is destroying this country and the filthy ass Liberals want it to grow even more.

Can you point to one country on the planet which has the size government that you prefer so we can evaluate the depth of your foolishness?

Hong Kong has minimal government and the most economic freedom in the world and a very strong vibrant economy. Even the Communists were not stupid enough to screw that economy up.

We could have a very good government in this country by spending a third to half of the money on government that we spend now. With a few trillions more being spent in the produce economy instead of the government bureaucracy our economy would boom. The welfare queens wouldn't like it but who gives a shit?

How much are we spending on welfare?

Too much. $1 is too much.

 

[Slade3200]

I'm simply asking for a projected model of economic effects under the desired conditions that the OP is promoting. So far nobody can put down some real numbers for us to look at.

Real numbers:

The combined cost of Federal, State and Local government in this country is about 40% of GDP.

For most Americans working families the yearly direct and indict cost of government is the single largest household expense.

According to the CIA Factbook the cost of combined government in the US is greater than the GDP of all but two other countries on earth. If you include only the Federal government that only adds two more countries to the list and one of them just barely makes the cut.

Because of the horrendous cost of government this country has, for the last eight years, experienced increased poverty, decreased family income, increased income disparity, had dismal economic growth and accumulated $10 trillion additional debt on the Federal side and three trillion on the State and local side.

The cost of government is destroying this country and the filthy ass Liberals want it to grow even more.

Can you point to one country on the planet which has the size government that you prefer so we can evaluate the depth of your foolishness?

Hong Kong has minimal government and the most economic freedom in the world and a very strong vibrant economy. Even the Communists were not stupid enough to screw that economy up.

We could have a very good government in this country by spending a third to half of the money on government that we spend now. With a few trillions more being spent in the produce economy instead of the government bureaucracy our economy would boom. The welfare queens wouldn't like it but who gives a shit?

How much are we spending on welfare?

Too much. $1 is too much.

I see you've checked out from the conversation. I guess thats what happens when you are out of substantive things to say