Independent thinker
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2015
- 20,565
- 16,776
- 2,288
Everything you don't like is a bullshit source. But, it's not a bullshit source.This is a bullshit source.
Try to do better.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Everything you don't like is a bullshit source. But, it's not a bullshit source.This is a bullshit source.
Try to do better.
You initially stated that "anything on MSNBC is pure fiction," yet that claim is not supported by your own (questionable) link which states:Everything you don't like is a bullshit source. But, it's not a bullshit source.
That's not a very good recommendation.You initially stated that "anything on MSNBC is pure fiction," yet that claim is not supported by your own (questionable) link which states:
When reporting straight news stories, MSNBC is highly factual and well-sourced. They use NBC News as their primary source; however, due to some of the guest political pundits spreading misinformation on their daily programs, we cannot rate MSNBC High for factual reporting on the whole.
A 2014 Pew Research Survey found that 48% of MSNBC’s audience is consistently or primarily liberal, 33% Mixed, and 18% consistently or mostly conservative. This indicates that a more liberal audience prefers MSNBC. Further, a Reuters institute survey found that 46% of respondents trust their news coverage and 35% do not, ranking them #5 in trust of the major USA news providers.
LOL. So, now you have changed your story about my link. Is it questionable or not? If so then your post is questionable.You initially stated that "anything on MSNBC is pure fiction," yet that claim is not supported by your own (questionable) link which states:
When reporting straight news stories, MSNBC is highly factual and well-sourced. They use NBC News as their primary source; however, due to some of the guest political pundits spreading misinformation on their daily programs, we cannot rate MSNBC High for factual reporting on the whole.
A 2014 Pew Research Survey found that 48% of MSNBC’s audience is consistently or primarily liberal, 33% Mixed, and 18% consistently or mostly conservative. This indicates that a more liberal audience prefers MSNBC. Further, a Reuters institute survey found that 46% of respondents trust their news coverage and 35% do not, ranking them #5 in trust of the major USA news providers.
So you still stand by your statement that anything on MSNBC is pure fiction even though your own link says otherwise?LOL. So, now you have changed your story about my link. Is it questionable or not? If so then your post is questionable.
Would you care to see the stats on Fox, Newsmax, and Breitbart?That's not a very good recommendation.
I see you purposely avoided my question of whether you believe my link was questionable or not. It's very amusing that you call it questionable and then you turn right around and quote from my link. I guess it wasn't questionable then.So you still stand by your statement that anything on MSNBC is pure fiction even though your own link says otherwise?
No.I see you purposely avoided my question of whether you believe my link was questionable or not. It's very amusing that you call it questionable and then you turn right around and quote from my link. I guess it wasn't questionable then.
LOL. It's questionable but you felt they were unquestionable enough to quote them.No.
It's questionable.
Yet the fact that your own questionable source disproves your initial statement that your source was supposed to back up makes you look like the fool that you are.
Usually people try to post links they believe back up whatever it is they are trying to say.
But you did it backwards.
You posted a source that disproved your idiotic statement.
Keep up the good work though.
I quoted it because it was painfully obvious you hadn't bothered ti read your own goofy link.LOL. It's questionable but you felt they were unquestionable enough to quote them.
LOL. So to prove my link is questionable, you quote the link from my post, proving that you don't think the source is questionable.I quoted it because it was painfully obvious you hadn't bothered ti read your own goofy link.
You should really read your own links befire you post them.LOL. So to prove my link is questionable, you quote the link from my post, proving that you don't think the source is questionable.
So, you're saying that the link and the source are not questionable.You should really read your own links befire you post them.
Do you have a reading disability?So, you're saying that the link and the source are not questionable.
Yes, you have said my source was questionable and then you used my source yourself to try proving that my source was questionable. I'm not the one with the disability. You are.Do you have a reading disability?
I have already answered that question.
Students Not Being Paid Is the Worst Insult to Intelligence in HistoryThe next time you need any kind of medical procedure then I suggest you just go get one of the bums in the Walgreen's parking lot to perform it for you.
You know....since it (education) doesn't really matter.
Same with the pilot of the next airline flight you have to take.
Or the teachers you leave your kids with all day long five days a week.
Or the plumber, electrician, mechanic, etc. you are going to depend upon to perform the next much needed technical service for you.
Here's the reality of your "education is overrated," cult propaganda mantra.....
Diploma-Dumbo DialogueThat is an ignorant statement.
Care to clarify it or even back it up in any way?
If Collegians Aren't Paid, Graduates Are AmateursSo you still stand by your statement that anything on MSNBC is pure fiction even though your own link says otherwise?
What Makes You "Think" That Those Are the Leftists' Opposites?Would you care to see the stats on Fox, Newsmax, and Breitbart?