- Thread starter
- #21
The most obvious part of this issue is abortion. They support the slaughter of millions and millions of defenseless babies. But I'm not going to focus on that (that is obvious and there are plenty of discussion on that).
What I'm going to focus on is the automobile. It kills more babies and more children every year than guns. Yet there has never been an instance of liberals calling for the ban of automobiles. Why? Why do they want to ban guns when automobiles are killing way more children?
One can only come to the logical conclusion that they simply don't care (especially when combined with their pro-murder-the-baby abortion stance) about children. Their party has instructed them to focus on guns, because disarming the population is how they can take complete control of the people. And that is what their platform is actually focused on - power. Controlling the people.
It's tragic how they place their hunger for power above children - the future of this country.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/05/nyregion/baby-whose-parents-were-killed-in-crash-also-dies.html
How about we call for an end to war, because war results in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent little babies and children, yet I haven't seen a right winger stand up for these defenseless little babies. I can only assume they don't care!
I don't know a conservative who wouldn't do anything to end war. Unfortunately, there are power-hungry left-wing nutters out there like Adolf Hitler, Saddam Hussein, Joseph Stalin, and Mao Tse-Tung who want the entire world's population under their control. Which makes your absurd comment a utopian pipe-dream (but what else would we expect from a liberal than a utopian pipe-dream?)